Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation

심방세동의 비약물적 치료

  • On, Young-Keun (Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 온영근 (성균관대학교 의과대학 내과학교실)
  • Published : 2011.10.01

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and its prevalence is expected to increase with increasing age. The risk of stroke also increases substantially with age. There are three strategies for the management of AF, that is, rate control, rhythm control and anticoagulation for prevention of embolism. Antiarrhythmic drugs are usually used for rhythm control as first line therapy but there are some limitations in using antiarrhythmic drugs for AF. Catheter ablation of AF should be considered as second line therapy. The primary indication for catheter ablation is the presence of symptomatic AF refractory or intolerant to antiarrhythmic medication. Warfarin is more effective effective in preventing stroke than aspirin and combination aspirin-clopidogrel. Despite its proven efficacy, warfarin is often not well tolerated by patients, has a very narrow therapeutic range, and has a high risk for bleeding complications. Echocardiography and autopsy studies showed that the left atrial appendage (LAA) was the source of thrombi in more than 90% of patients with non-valvular AF. Percutaneous catheter-based devices have been developed to close and thereby effectively exclude the LAA from the systemic circulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:e101-e198.
  2. Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer DL, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:816-861. Erratum in: Heart Rhythm 2009;6:148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.04.005
  3. O'Neill MD, Jais P, Hocini M, et al. Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation 2007;116:1515-1523. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.655738
  4. Asirvatham SJ, Packer DL. Managing Atrial Fibrillation: catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic therapy? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2;599-602. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.109.922674
  5. Terasawa T, Balk EM, Chung M, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:191-202. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00131
  6. Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for Human Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010;3:32-38. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859116
  7. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised noninferiority trial. Lancet 2009;374:534-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X