Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회지)

The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Various Men's Body Shapes and Drops for Developing Menswear Sizing Systems in the United States

  • HwangShin, Su-Jeong (Dept. of Design-Apparel Design & Manufacturing, Texas Tech University) ;
  • Istook, Cynthia L. (Dept. of Textile & Apparel, Technology & Management, North Carolina State University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Hee (Dept. of Fashion Design & Apparel Industry, Wonkwang University)
  • Received : 2011.10.20
  • Accepted : 2011.11.15
  • Published : 2011.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Menswear body types are often labeled on garments (to indicate how the garments are designed to fit) with indicators of a size category such as regular, portly, and stout, athletic, or big and tall. A drop (relationships between the chest and waist girths) is related to the fit of a tailored suit. However, current standards are not designed for various drops or body types. There is not enough information of categorizing men's body shapes for the apparel sizing systems. In this article, a set of men's data from SizeUSA sizing survey was analyzed to investigate men's body shapes and drops. Factor analysis and a cluster analysis method were used to categorize men's body shapes. In the results, twenty-five variables were selected through the factor analysis and found four factors: girth factor, height factor, torso girth factor, and slope degree factor. According to the factor and cluster analysis, various body shapes were found: Slim Shape (SS - tall ectomorphy), Heavy Shape (HS - athletic, big & tall, endomorphy and mesomorphy), Slant Inverted Triangle Shape (SITS - regular, slight ectomorphy and slight mesomorphy weight range from normal to slightly overweight), Short Round Top Shape (SRTS - portly and stout, endomorphy). Body shapes were related to fitting categories. SS and HS were related to big & tall fitting category. SITS was related to regular. SRTS was related to portly and stout. Shape 1 (31%) and Shape 2 (26%) were related to current big & tall category. Shape 3 (34%) were related to regular. Shape 4 (9%) were in portly and stout category. ASTM D 6240 standard was the only available standard that presented a regular fitting category. Various drops were found within a same chest size group; however, this study revealed great variances of drops by body shape.

Keywords

References

  1. Aldrich, W. (1980). Metric pattern cutting for menswear: Including unisex clothes and computer aided design (3rd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Science.
  2. Alexander, M., Connell, L. J., & Ulrich, P. V. (2004). Using three-dimensional body scan data for body shape and body build analysis. Proceedings of the International Textile and Apparel Association, USA, 61, 5-6.
  3. ASTM. (2006). ASTM D6240: Standard tables of body measurements for men sizes thirty-four to sixty (34 to 60) regular. American Society of Testing Material International Standard, 7(2), 1-6. doi:10.1520/D6240-98R06
  4. Boswell, S. (1993). Menswear suiting the customer. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  5. Business Wire. (2007, November 14). Global luxury goods market growing at 9% per year despite uncertain signals. SmartBrief. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from http://www.smartbrief.com/news/aaaa/industryBW-detail.jsp?id=F8FCA1B6-2F01-4D89-9FD9-1D668CF7AE02
  6. Chan, A. P., Fan, J., & Yu, W. M. (2005). Prediction of men's shirt pattern based on 3D body measurements. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 17(2), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09556220510581245
  7. Connell, L., Ulrich, P., Knox, A., Hutton, G., Woronka, D., & Ashdown, S. (2002, November). Body scan analysis for fit models based on body shape and posture analysis(S01-AC27). South Carolina: National Textile Center Annual Report.
  8. Cooklin, G. (1992). Pattern Grading for men's clothes: the technology of sizing. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  9. Dickerson, K. (2003). Inside the fashion business (7th ed.). Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  10. Douty, H. I., Moore, J. B., & Hartford, D. (1974). Body characteristics in relation to life adjustment, body-imageand attitudes of college females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 499-521. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1974.39.1.499
  11. Farrell-Beck, J. A., & Pouliot, C. J. (1983). Pant alteration by graphic somatometry techniques. Home Economics Research Journal, 12(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8301200112
  12. Fringe, G. S. (2005). Fashion from concept to consumer (8th ed.). Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  13. Glock, R. E., & Kunz, G. (2005). Apparel manufacturing sewn product analysis (4th ed.). Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Person Education.
  14. Heisey, F. L., Brown, P., & Johnson, R. F. (1986). A mathematical analysis of the graphic somatometry method of pattern alteration. Home Economics Research Journal,15(2), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8601500205
  15. Kim, I. (2003). Ease and ethnicity: Important variables in good pants fit. Proceedings of International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference, USA, 60, 62.
  16. Kolesnikov-Jessop, S. (2010, January 28). It's a man's world. Newsweek. Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.newsweek.com/id/232695
  17. Lee, J. H. (2004). Analysis of head shape of college students for the headgears, Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(1), 182-188.
  18. National Institute of Health. (2006). Body mass index. NIH. Retrieved November 26, 2006, from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/bmitbl.htm
  19. Rueters. (2010, January 31). Hopes for 2010 fashion recovery at Milan menswear. Business World. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from http://www.bworldonline.com/main/content.php?id=5073
  20. Sheldon, W. H. (1954). Atlas of men: A guide for somatotyping the adult male at all ages. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  21. Shin, S., & Istook, C. (2007). Importance of understanding the shape of diverse ethnic female consumers for developing jeans sizing systems. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00581.x
  22. Sieben, W. A., & Chen-Yu, H. J. (1992). The accuracy of size information on men's prewashed jeans. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9201100111
  23. Simmons, K. P., Istook, C. L., & Devarajan, P. (2004). Female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel part II: Development of shape sorting software. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 4(1). Retrieved July 15, 2011, from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue1/articles/Istook/Istook_full_107_04.pdf
  24. Stan, G. (2005, November 28). Fit remains key problem for B&T men. DNR: Daily News Record, 35(48), 1-2.
  25. Stone, E. (2007). Infashion fun fame fortune. New York: Fairchild publications, Inc.
  26. Stone, E. (2008). The dynamics of fashion (3rd ed.). New York: Fairchild publications, Inc.
  27. Stunkard, A. J., & Albaum, J. M. (1981). The accuracy of self-reported weights. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 34(8), 1593-1599. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/34.8.1593
  28. Tate, S. L. (2004). Inside fashion design (5th ed.). Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  29. [TC]2. (2004). The national sizing survey: Body measurement and data analysis reports on the U.S. population. Cary, North Carolina: Author.