Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제44권1호
  • /
  • Pages.51-54
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case of Gossypiboma Masquerading as a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

  • Cheon, Jong-Woon (Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Young (Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Yong (Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jae-Bum (Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Young-Kook (Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Ka-Young (Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Chae, Hyun-Dong (Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2011.09.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Gossypiboma refers to a mass resulting from a retained gauze pad accidentally left within the body after surgery. Although the clinical features are diverse, it is often found incidentally as a mass having an internal cystic change and adhesion to adjacent organs. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is helpful, yet the initial diagnosis can be misleading in cases with atypical findings. We report a case of gossypiboma in a 78-year-old woman that we suspected was a gastrointestinal stromal tumor according to abdominal CT and endoscopic ultrasound, yet was diagnosed as a gossypiboma postoperatively.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lu YY, Cheung YC, Ko SF, Ng SH. Calcified reticulate rind sign: a characteristic feature of gossypiboma on computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:4927-4929. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4927
  2. Yamamura N, Nakajima K, Takahashi T, et al. Intra-abdominal textiloma. A retained surgical sponge mimicking a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: report of a case. Surg Today 2008;38:552-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3654-x
  3. Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 2003;348:229-235. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa021721
  4. Sturdy JH, Baird RM, Gerein AN. Surgical sponges: a cause of granuloma and adhesion formation. Ann Surg 1967;165:128-134. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-196701000-00017
  5. Choi BI, Kim SH, Yu ES, Chung HS, Han MC, Kim CW. Retained surgical sponge: diagnosis with CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:1047-1050. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.150.5.1047
  6. Kokubo T, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Yoshikawa K, Iio M, Atomi Y. Retained surgical sponges: CT and US appearance. Radiology 1987;165:415-418. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.165.2.3310095
  7. Kopka L, Fischer U, Gross AJ, Funke M, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E. CT of retained surgical sponges (textilomas): pitfalls in detection and evaluation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:919-923. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199611000-00009
  8. Kwon JG, Kim EY, Kim YS, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonographic impression compared with pathologic diagnosis in gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Korean J Gastroenterol 2005;45:88-96.
  9. Kim EY. Endoscopic ultrasonography in locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Korean J Gastroenterol 2008;52:124-127.
  10. Darnell A, Dalmau E, Pericay C, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Abdom Imaging 2006;31:387-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0092-8

피인용 문헌

  1. Fluorouracil implants caused a diaphragmatic tumor to be misdiagnosed as liver metastasis: a case report vol.16, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2778-z