DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cultural Adaptation of a Compliance Questionnaire for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis to a Korean Version

  • Lee, Ju-Yeun (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, So-Young (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Hahn, Hyeon-Joo (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Son, In-Ja (Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Hahn, Suh-Gyung (Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Bong (Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2011.03.01

초록

Background/Aims: The Compliance Questionnaire-Rheumatology (CQR) is a validated scale to evaluate patient compliance for anti-rheumatic medications. We developed a Korean version of the CQR (KCQR) and confirmed its reliability and validity. Methods: We prepared the KCQR by translating and back-translating the original CQR with modifications to adapt it to Korean culture. Fifty Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled in this study. The test-retest reliability of the KCQR was evaluated at a 2-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the KCQR was assessed by identifying associations between KCQR scores and patient compliance, measured using pharmacy refill data. Results: The reliability of the KCQR was adequate, with an ICC of 0.71 for test-retest reliability. With respect to validity, the summed score of the weighted KCQR showed a significant correlation with pharmacy refill data ($r^2$ =0.57) on multiple regression analysis. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the KCQR is a reliable, valid instrument to evaluate compliance of Korean patients for RA medications.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Emery P. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ 2006;332:152-155. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7534.152
  2. Lee J. Update on rheumatoid arthritis. Korean J Med 2009;76:296-299.
  3. Owen SG, Friesen WT, Roberts MS, Flux W. Determinants of compliance in rheumatoid arthritic patients assessed in their home environment. Br J Rheumatol 1985;24:313-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/24.4.313
  4. Nuesch R, Schroeder K, Dieterle T, Martina B, Battegay E. Relation between insufficient response to antihypertensive treatment and poor compliance with treatment: a prospective casecontrol study. BMJ 2001;323:142-146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7305.142
  5. Waeber B, Vetter W, Darioli R, Keller U, Brunner HR. Improved blood pressure control by monitoring compliance with antihypertensive therapy. Int J Clin Pract 1999;53:37-38.
  6. DiMatteo MR. Enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations. JAMA 1994;271:79, 83.
  7. Chisholm MA, Lance CE, Mulloy LL. Patient factors associated with adherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1775-1781. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp040541
  8. Hill J. Adherence with drug therapy in the rheumatic diseases Part two: measuring and improving adherence. Musculoskeletal Care 2005;3:143-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.4
  9. Pullar T, Peaker S, Martin MF, Bird HA, Feely MP. The use of a pharmacological indicator to investigate compliance in patients with a poor response to antirheumatic therapy. Br J Rheumatol 1988;27:381-384. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/27.5.381
  10. de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, van der Tempel H, Urquhart J, van der Linden S. Patient compliance in rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and gout. J Rheumatol 2003;30:44-54.
  11. Beck NC, Parker JC, Frank RG, et al. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis at high risk for noncompliance with salicylate treatment regimens. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1081-1084.
  12. de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S. Development of a questionnaire to investigate patient compliance with antirheumatic drug therapy. J Rheumatol 1999;26:2635-2641.
  13. de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S. The compliance-questionnaire-rheumatology compared with electronic medication event monitoring: a validation study. J Rheumatol 2003;30:2469-2475.
  14. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780310302
  15. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.
  16. Mallion JM, Dutrey-Dupagne C, Vaur L, et al. Benefits of electronic pillboxes in evaluating treatment compliance of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. J Hypertens 1996;14:137-144.
  17. Weidler D, Wallin JD, Cook E, Dillard D, Lewin A. Transdermal clonidine as an adjunct to enalapril: an evaluation of efficacy and patient compliance. J Clin Pharmacol 1992;32:444-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03860.x
  18. Burnier M, Schneider MP, Chioléro A, Stubi CL, Brunner HR. Electronic compliance monitoring in resistant hypertension: the basis for rational therapeutic decisions. J Hypertens 2001;19:335-341. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200102000-00022
  19. Eisen SA, Miller DK, Woodward RS, Spitznagel E, Przybeck TR. The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1881-1884. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1990.00390200073014
  20. Waeber B, Brunner HR, Metry JM. Compliance with antihypertensive treatment: implications for practice. Blood Press 1997;6:326-331. https://doi.org/10.3109/08037059709062091
  21. Leenen FH, Wilson TW, Bolli P, et al. Patterns of compliance with once versus twice daily antihypertensive drug therapy in primary care: a randomized clinical trial using electronic monitoring. Can J Cardiol 1997;13:914-920.
  22. Wetzels GE, Nelemans PJ, Schouten JS, van Wijk BL, Prins MH. All that glisters is not gold: a comparison of electronic monitoring versus filled prescriptions-an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-8
  23. Stewart M. The validity of an interview to assess a patient's drug taking. Am J Prev Med 1987;3:95-100.
  24. Landry JA, Smyer MA, Tubman JG, Lago DJ, Roberts J, Simonson W. Validation of two methods of data collection of selfreported medicine use among the elderly. Gerontologist 1988;28:672-676. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/28.5.672
  25. Grymonpre RE, Didur CD, Montgomery PR, Sitar DS. Pill count, self-report, and pharmacy claims data to measure medication adherence in the elderly. Ann Pharmacother 1998;32:749-754. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.17423
  26. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

피인용 문헌

  1. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology in Patients With Behcet’s Disease vol.27, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615577699
  2. Spanish transcultural adaptation and validation of the English version of the compliance questionnaire in rheumatology vol.38, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-3930-7
  3. Measurement Properties of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Medication Adherence: Systematic Review vol.22, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2196/19179
  4. Contribution of Personality Traits, Psychological Factors, and Health-Related Quality of Life to Medication Adherence in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis vol.61, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2020.61.5.406
  5. Adherence to Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from Spain vol.15, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s291983
  6. Cross-Cultural Validation of the 5-Item Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology to the Arabic Language in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis vol.15, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s316263