Hip & pelvis

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.39-46
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2287-3260(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3279(eISSN)
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

불안정성 대퇴 전자 주위 골절을 가진 환자에서 항회전 근위 대퇴 골수정을 이용한 치료결과

Results of the Proximal Femoral Nail-Antirotation (PFNA) in Patients with an Unstable Pertrochanteric Fracture

  • 성열보 (인제대학교 의과대학 상계백병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 조성일 (인제대학교 의과대학 상계백병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Sung, Yerl-Bo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sang-Gye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University) ;
  • Jo, Sung-Il (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sang-Gye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 불안정성 대퇴 전자 주위골절을 가진 환자의 치료에 있어서 항회전 근위 대퇴 골수정 (PFNA)을 이용한 치료결과에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 2006년 9월부터 2010년 3월까지 PFNA를 이용하여 치료한 불안정성 대퇴 전자 주위골절 환자 187명 중 47예를 대상으로 하였다. 평균 골 유합 기간, blade의 활강 정도 및 대퇴 경간각의 차이, 활동 정도 및 합병증 등을 점검하였다. 결과: 방사선학적 골 유합은 평균 15.8주에 얻을 수 있었으며 술 후 66% 에서 수술 전 보행을 회복할 수 있었다. blade의 평균 활강은 5.5 mm 였으며 대퇴 경간각은 평균 4.4$^{\circ}$의 내반 전위를 보였다. 골두의 천공 및 임박 천공이 각각 2예씩 발생하였으며, 1예에서 외상 후 골두 무혈성 괴사가 발생하였다. 그리고 2예에서 술 후 추시 중 외측벽 골절(lateral wall fracture)이 발생하였다. 결론: 불안정성 대퇴전자주위골절에 있어서 항회전 근위 대퇴골수정을 이용한 수술은 수술 시간이 짧고, 환자의 거동능력 회복이 양호하며, 합병증도 적어 유용한 치료법 중 하나라고 생각된다. 그러나 골두 천공 같은 심각한 합병증을 막기 위해서는 세심한 시술이 필요하다.

Purpose: This study was performed to review the results of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation) for treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: Forty-seven out of 187 hips treated from September 2006 to March 2010 with PFNA for unstable femoral pertrochanteric fractures were enrolled in this study. The mean duration to radiologic bone union, the functional status and the complications were assessed. The Cleveland index, the tip apex distance, the sliding distance of the blade and the change in the neck-shaft angle were also measured. Results: The mean duration to radiologic bone union was 15.8 weeks and 66% of the patients recovered to a premorbid functional status. The average amount of blade sliding was 5.5 mm and the mean change of the neck-shaft angle was varus 4.4$^{\circ}$. There were 2 cases of penetration of the blade tip, 2 cases of impending penetration, one case of posttraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and 2 cases of lateral wall fractures. Conclusion: PFNA would be preferable for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in terms of the short operation time, the rapid ambulatory recovery and the reduced complications. Yet careful handling is required to avoid a grave complication such as head penetration.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hwang DS, Rhee KJ, Choi JH. Recovery of walking ability after treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: comparision of compression hip screw to primary hemiarthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 1999;11:22-9.
  2. Lee JY, Lee SY. Treatment of the proximal femoral extracapsular fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): comparision with proximal femoral nail (PFN). J Korean Hip Soc. 2007;19:183-9.
  3. Richmaond J, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Mortality risk after hip fracture. 2003. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17 Suppl:S2-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200309001-00002
  4. Evans EM. Trochanteric fractures; a review of 110 cases treated by nail-plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33B:192-204.
  5. Flores LA, Harrington IJ, Heller M. The stability of intertrochanteric fractures treated with a sliding screwplate. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:37-40.
  6. Pugh WL. A self-adjusting nail-plate for fractures about the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A:1085-93.
  7. Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Proter BB, Checketts RG. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:26-31.
  8. Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Alho A, Ekeland A, stromsoe K. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199805000-00005
  9. Rha JD, Kim YH, Yoon SI, Park TS, Lee MH. Factors affecting sliding of the lag screw in intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 1993;17:320-4.
  10. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Courl-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:394-400. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200108000-00003
  11. Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F. Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail. Int Orthop. 1996;20:47-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640050026
  12. Friedl W, Colombo-Benkmann M, Dockter S, Machens HG, Mieck U. Gamma nail osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 4 years experiences and their consequences for further implant development. Chirurg. 1994;65:953-63.
  13. Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30:327-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00091-1
  14. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr, Ishizuka T. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:1399-408.
  15. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1058-64.
  16. Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, Meadows SE, Zuckerman JD. Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;310:150-9.
  17. Choo SK, Oh HK, Kim YC, Lee DB. Excessive sliding of compression hip screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly. J Korean Hip Soc. 2007;19:190-6.
  18. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures: I. Overview and evaluation and treatment of femoral-neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2:141-9.
  19. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures: II. Evaluation and treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2:150-6.
  20. Leung KS, Chen CM, So WS, et al. Multicenter trial of modified Gamma nail in East Asia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;323:146-54.
  21. Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomised comparision of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:789-93.
  22. Ahn SJ, Park JH. Proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of the femoral trochanteric fracture. J Korean Soc Fract. 2004;17:7-12.
  23. Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Frankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszhowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)--a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a proxpective study of 55 patients with a followup of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013662
  24. Kim BS, Lew SW, Ko SH, Cho SD, Yang JH, Park MS. Treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail. J Korean Soc Fract. 2004;17:1-6.
  25. Sung YB, Sohn YJ, Yum JK, et al. Proximal femoral nail (PFN) for intertrochanteric fracture: long-term follow up results. J Korean Hip Soc. 2005;17:141-8.
  26. Papasimos S, Koutsojannis CM, Panagopoulos A, Megas P, Lambiris E. A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:462-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0021-5
  27. Moon YW, Suh DH, Kang ST, Kwon DJ, Ji YN, Lee KB. The proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. J Korean Soc Fract. 2003;16:29-36.
  28. Steinberg GG, Desai SS, Kornwitz NA, Sullivan TJ. The intertrochanteric hip fracture. A retrospective analysis. Orthopedics. 1988;11:265-73.
  29. Yoo JH, Park JS, Noh KC, et al. The results of proximal femoral nail antirotation: a comparative study with proximal femoral nail. J Korean Hip Soc. 2008;20:286-92.
  30. Lee KJ, Min BW, Cho CH, Song KS, Bae KC, Kim SG. Results of treating senile osteoporotic peritrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). J Korean Hip Soc. 2009;21:162-8.
  31. Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury. 2010;41:810-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.020
  32. Mulholland RC, Gunn DR. Sliding screw plate fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Trauma. 1972;12:581-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197207000-00006
  33. Nunn D. Sliding hip screws and medial displacement osteotomy. J R Soc Med. 1988;81:140-2.
  34. Thomas AP. Dynamic hip screws that fail. Injury. 1991;22:45-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(91)90161-7
  35. Gundle R, Gargan MF, Simpson AH. How to minimize failures of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Injury. 1995;26:611-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)00125-S
  36. Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF. Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:216-21.
  37. Jensen JS. Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51:803-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678008990877
  38. Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury. 2008;39:932-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.005
  39. Brunner A, Jockel JA, Babst R. The PFNA proximal femur nail in treatment of unstable proximal femur fracture--3 cases of postoperative perforation of the helical blade into the hip joint. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:731-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181893b1b
  40. Lucke M, Burghardt RD, Siebenlist S, Ganslmeier A, Stockle U. Medial migration of lag screw with intrapelvic dislocation in gamma nailing--a unique problem? A report of 2 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:e6-e11. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a4eeb2

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison between the Results of Internal Fixation Using Proximal Femur Nail Anti-rotation and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Elderly Patients vol.24, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5371/jkhs.2012.24.1.45
  2. Mid-term Results of Patients with Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation vol.24, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2012.24.2.124
  3. Effectiveness of the Valgus Reduction Technique in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures Using Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation vol.48, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2013.48.6.441
  4. The Difference between Short and Long Intramedullary Nailing as the Treatment for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture (AO/OTA 31-A2) in Elderly Patients vol.52, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2017.52.1.25