우리나라 노출기준 초과 발암성물질의 특성

Characteristics of Occupational Carcinogens Exceeding Occupational Exposure Limit in Korea, 1999 to 2009

  • 피영규 (대구한의대학교 보건학부)
  • 투고 : 2011.09.20
  • 심사 : 2011.12.23
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31

초록

The objective of this study was to analyze 157 processes of 145 industries that exceeded Korean Occupational Exposure Limits (KOEL) for carcinogen during the 11 year period from 1999 to 2009. The data included number of industry and workers exposed, type of carcinogen and their exceeded ratio, type and size of industry in each year. These data were collected by 46 regional employment & labor offices in Korea using work environment monitoring reports. The result showed that, in each year, about 10 industries exceed their carcinogen exposure limit. The most common carcinogen exceeding KOEL were found to be formaldehyde, benzene, ethylene oxide and chromium VI. The carcinogen with the highest level of over-exposure were in the order of formaldehyde, benzene, ethylene oxide and asbestos. Fabricated metal product manufacturing industry were found to be most vulnerable against carcinogen with 11.1% of them exceeding carcinogen KOEL followed by electronic components manufacturing industry (8.3%), chemical products manufacturing industry (6.3%), and electrical equipments manufacturing industry (4.9%). The industry employing less than 50 workers had the highest percentage of exceeding carcinogen KOEL with 52.8%. The result also showed that strengthening KOEL for benzene and asbestos helped reduce the level of carcinogen over-exposure. Based on these results, strengthening the KOEL or new regulation turned out to help reduce the carcinogen over-exposure level. Benzene, ethylene oxide and chromium VI were the most frequently over-exposed carcinogen with the highest level. Therefore, these chemicals need to be regulated with a highest priority to improve the workplace environment. The results also show that the small-sized industries employing less than 50 workers was the most vulnerable against carcinogen exposures. Therefore, more government support are needed for these small-sized industries to help them to improve their workplace environment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강성규, 안연순, 정호근. 1990년대 한국의 직업성암. 대한산업의학회지 2001;13(4):351-359
  2. 고용노동부. 산업안전보건법령집. 고용노동부 산재예방 정책과. 열림기획; 2011a. (107-108쪽.)
  3. 고용노동부. 작업환경측정 및 정도관리 규정(고용노동부고시 제2011-25호). 2011b. (22쪽.)
  4. 고용노동부. 화학물질 및 물리적인자의 노출기준(고용 노동부고시 제2011-13호). 2011c. (8-82쪽.)
  5. 김은아, 심광진. 발암성물질 취급사업장의 노출평가에 관한 연구(1). 한국산업안전공단; 2001. (1-2쪽.)
  6. 김은아, 주귀돈, 정종득. 발암성물질 취급사업장의 노출 평가에 관한 연구(2). -금속가공유 취급 근로자의 다핵방향족탄화수소 노출을 중심으로- 한국산업안전공단; 2002. (1-2쪽.)
  7. 노동부. 2008년도 작업환경측정현황. 산업안전보건국. 승림문화사;. 2009. (16쪽.)
  8. 노동부. 화학물질의 분류 표시 및 물질안전보건자료에 관한 기준(노동부고시 제2009-68호). 2009. (44쪽).
  9. 노동부. 화학물질 및 물리적인자의 노출기준(노동부고시 제2002-8호). 2002. (113쪽.)
  10. 문영한, 최정근, 강성규. 직업성암 발생 실태조사 및 발암성물질 관리제도 개선 방향 연구. 한국산업안전공단; 1998. (36-50쪽.)
  11. 이권섭, 신현화, 이진수, 조지훈, 최진희, 최성봉. 독성 및 물리적 특성 DB를 이용한 관리대상 유해물질 선정의 타당성 연구. 한국산업안전보건공단; 2008. (27-28쪽.)
  12. 조수헌, 고경심, 권호장. 우리나라 직업성암 발생에 관한 예측과 관리방안. 노동부; 1994. (50-57쪽.)
  13. 통계청. 제9차 한국표준산업분류 분류항목표. 2011. Available from: URL: http://kostat.go.kr/ kssc/board_notice/BoardAction.do?method=list&board_ id=23&catgrp=kssc&catid1=kssc01&catid2=kssc01d
  14. 피영규, 원정일, 정춘화, 국원근, 변상훈 등. 발암성물질 관리기준 및 적용방안 연구. 한국산업안전보건공단; 2009. (3쪽.)
  15. 한국산업안전보건공단. 한국의 직업병의 현황과 실태. 2004. (79-96쪽.)
  16. 후생노동성. 노동안전위생법. 2011. Available from: URL:http://wwwhourei.mhlw.go.jp/hourei/html/tsuchi/co ntents.html
  17. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure Indices. Cincinnati: ACGIH; 2010. p. 73-74
  18. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 29 part 1910.1003, 13 Carcinogen, U.S. CFR. 2011. Available from: URL:http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_d ocument?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10007
  19. European Union. European Regulation on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of chemical substances and mixtures. EC; 2011. Available from: URL:http://ec. europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/classification/inde x_en.htm
  20. Health & Safety Executive. List of approved workplace exposure limits. HSE; 2007. p. 10-26
  21. International Labour Organization. C139 Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974. ILO; 2011. Available from: URL:http://www.ilo.orgilolex/cgi-lex/convde. pl?C139
  22. International Agency Research on Cancer. IARC; 2010. Available from: URL:http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/ Classification/crthalllist.php
  23. Kranig A. Occupational cancer in Germany: Claims, diagnosis, compensation, and management. In : International symposium for occupational cancer and management system. OSHRI; 2009. p. 35-44
  24. Kim EA. Occupational cancer in Korea. In : International symposium for occupational cancer and management system. OSHRI; 2009. p. 47-58
  25. National Toxicology Program. NTP; 2011. Available from: URL:http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/toc11.html
  26. Takahashi K. Occupational cancer in Japan. In : International symposium for occupational cancer and management system. OSHRI; 2009. p. 21-44
  27. Vainio H. Finnish management system for the workers exposed to carcinogens in workplace. In : International symposium for occupational cancer and management system. OSHRI; 2009. p. 5-18