Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회지)

Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Stream Naturalness Considering Physical, Biological, and Chemical Factors

물리·생물·화학인자를 고려한 하천자연도 평가 : 목감천 하류 구간을 대상으로

  • Kang, Won-Gu (GS Corporation) ;
  • Chung, Eun-Sung (Seoul National University of Science and Technology, School of Civil Engineering) ;
  • Lee, Kil Seong (Seoul National University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
  • Received : 2010.12.31
  • Accepted : 2011.03.15
  • Published : 2011.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective approach for assessment of stream naturalness is an essential part of the stream restoration project. This study proposes the methodology for the assessment of stream naturalness considering physical, biological and chemical factors. Physical factors consists of riffle and pool, river bed material, bank protection, floodplain vegetation and levee materials; biological factors are benthic macroinvertebrate, KSI (Korean Saprobic Index), and IBI (Index of Biological Integrity) and chemical factors are pH, DO (dissolved oxygen), and TP (total phosphorus). This procedure is applied to the Mokgamcheon. As a result, the downstream of Mokgamcheon (zone I) needs the prompt improvement of stream naturalness, compared to the others (zone II and III). This evaluation technique will be an effective tool to quantify the stream naturalness and can be used to set the target of stream restoration project.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부(2002). 자연친화적 하천 관리지침. 건설교통부 하계 13900-54.
  2. 건화엔지니어링(1995). 목감천수계 하천정비기본계획. 경기도.
  3. 경기개발연구원(2003). 안양천살리기 종합대책. 경기도.
  4. 경기개발연구원(2006). 2005년 안양천 모니터링. 안양시.
  5. 국립환경과학원(2006a). 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구 (III)-수생태건강성조사 및 평가체계연구. 환경부.
  6. 국립환경과학원(2006b). 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구 (III)-수질평가방법및 평가지표개발. 환경부.
  7. 국립환경과학원(2006c). 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구 (III)-요약보고서. 환경부.
  8. 국립환경연구원(2000). 정책결정자를 위한 각국의 수질관련 기준 비교분석.
  9. 박봉진, 신종이, 정관수(2005). 하천의 생물서식처 복원을 위한 하천자연도평가: I. 평가방법의 제안. 한국수자원학회 논문집, 38(1), pp. 37-48.
  10. 삼안(2008). 목감천 자연형하천정화사업 기본 및 실시설계 보고서. 광명시.
  11. 한국건설기술연구원(1997). 국내여건에 맞는 자연형 하천 공법의 개발 Vol. I. 2단계 1차년도 연차보고서. 환경부.
  12. 환경부(2002). 하천복원 가이드라인.
  13. 환경부(2009). 환경정책기본법 시행령. 대통령령 제 21887호.
  14. Environment Agency (2003). River Habitat Survey in Britain and Ireland- Field Survey Guidance Manual: 2003 Version. Bristol, U.K., pp. 1.1-5.3.
  15. Environment Australia (2001). Australian River Assessment System: AusRivAS Physical Assessment Protocol. Report Number 22, Canberra, Australia.
  16. Harris, J. H. (1995). The Use of Fish in Ecological Assessments. Journal of Ecology, 20(1), pp. 65-80.
  17. Karr, J. R. (1981). Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities. Fisheries, 6, pp. 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  18. Odum, E. P. and Barrett, G. W. (2005). Fundamentals of Ecology. 5th ed., Belmont, California, Thomson Books, USA.
  19. Raven, P. J., Holemes, N. T. H., Charrier, P., Dawson, F. H., Naura, M., and Boon, P. J. (2002). Towards a Harmonized Approach for Hydromorphological Assessment of Rivers in Europe: A Qualitative Comparison of Three Survey Method. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 12(4), pp. 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.536
  20. USDA (1998). Stream Visual Assessment Protocol. National Water and Climate Center Technical Note 99-1.
  21. USEPA (2006). Wadeable Streams Assessment: A Collaborative Assessment of the Nation's Streams. EPA 841-B-06-002, Washington, D.C., USA.