DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

단순 방사선에서의 한국인의 정상 근위 대퇴부의 해부학적 측정 : 항회전 근위 대퇴 골수정을 이용한 수술 시 문제점

Anatomical Measurement of Normal Korean Proximal Femur Using Plain Radiography : A Problem when using Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation

  • 박종석 (순천향대학교 의과대학 천안병원 정형외과) ;
  • 김우종 (순천향대학교 의과대학 천안병원 정형외과) ;
  • 소재완 (순천향대학교 의과대학 천안병원 정형외과) ;
  • 장병웅 (순천향대학교 의과대학 천안병원 정형외과) ;
  • 김태헌 (순천향대학교 의과대학 천안병원 정형외과) ;
  • 서유성 (순천향대학교병원 정형외과)
  • Park, Jong-Seok (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Jong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Soh, Jae-Wan (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Byung-Woong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Heon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Suh, You-Sung (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31

초록

목적: 한국인의 근위 대퇴부를 측정하여 항회전 근위 대퇴 골수정 삽입 시 문제점을 개선하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 2007년 2월부터 2011년 4월까지 대퇴부 전자간 골절로 내원하여 항회전 근위 대퇴 골수정으로 치료 받은 환자 230예를 대상으로 하였다. 단순 방사선을 이용하여 건측 대퇴부의 경간각과 골수정이 삽입되는 골수강에서 협부의 직경 및 환측의 수술 후 대전자부터 근위 골수정까지 돌출되어 있는 길이를 측정하여 평균, 표준편차를 계산하였고 성별과 측정값간의 상관관계를 알아보고자 한다. 결과: 평균 경간각은 $129.7^{\circ}$($111.0{\sim}138.3^{\circ}$), 직경은 14.5 mm(9.7~23.1 mm), 돌출 길이는 5.5 mm(1.5~15.3 mm)를 나타내었다. 통계학적 결과로 경간각과 성별은 유의한 차이가 있었다(p=0.000). 협부의 직경과 성별은 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p=0.775). 돌출 길이와 성별의 상관관계도 성별과 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p=0.753). 결론: 항회전 근위 골수정을 이용한 대퇴부 전자간 골절 수술에서 기구 선택이 제한적이었던 경험을 토대로 한국인의 해부학적 대퇴부의 경간각과 지름 및 골수정의 돌출 길이를 제시하며 한국인 체형에 맞는 골수정 규격의 다양화와 골수정의 근위부 길이가 좀 더 짧은 새로운 기구 제작에 사용될 수 있을 것이라 사료된다.

Purpose: We propose to improve the use of Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation in Korea by reporting anatomical measurements of the normal Korean proximal femur. Materials and Methods: A total of 230 patients were enrolled who had all experienced a femoral intertrochanteric fracture and undergone the Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation surgical procedure between February 2007 and April 2011. We measured the neck-shaft angle and endosteal width at the isthmus of a normal femur, and the distance between the greater trochanter and the nail tip of the Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation in post-operative plain radiography. We analyzed the average and standard deviations of the measurements. We also investigated correlations with the patient gender. Results: The average neck-shaft angle and endosteal width at the isthmus were $129.7^{\circ}$($111.0{\sim}138.3^{\circ}$) and 14.5 mm (9.7~23.1 mm), respectively. The average protruded nail length was 4.9 mm (1.0~15.0 mm). The femur neck-shaft angle had a correlation ratio with gender (p=0.000). However, the endosteal width at the isthmus level and the protruded nail length had no correlation ratio with gender (p=0.108, 0.573, respectively). Conclusion: Until now, in intertrochanteric fracture operations using Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation, the selection of devices has been extremely limited. Through this study we present the average Korean anatomical neckshaft angle, endosteal width of the femur, and protruding length of the nail tip. We expect that these numerical values can be used in the production of new devices with shorter proximal nails, which would be more appropriates for Koreans.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hwang DS, Rhee KJ, Choi JH. Recovery of walking ability after treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: comparison of compression hip screw to primary hemiarthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 1999;11:22-9.
  2. Lee JY, Lee SY. Treatment of proximal femoral extracapsular fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): comparison with proximal femoral nail (PFN). J Korean Hip Soc. 2007;19:183-9.
  3. Richmond J, Aharonoff GB, Zuckernab JD, Koval KJ. Mortality risk after hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:S2-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200309001-00002
  4. Hornby R, Evans JG, Vardon V. Operative or conservative treatment for trochanteric fractures of the femur: A randomised epidemiological trial in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:619-23.
  5. Jensen JS. Determining factors for the mortality following hip fractures. Injury. 1984;15:411-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(84)90209-2
  6. Kyle RF, Cabanela ME, Russel TA, et al. Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. Inst Course Lect. 1995;44: 227-53.
  7. Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Peritrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dymamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:76-81. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.C.01323
  8. Chang SA, Cho YH, Byun YS, Han JH, Park JY, Lee CY. The treatment of trochanteric femoral fracture with using proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). J Korean Hip Soc. 2009;21:252-6.
  9. Park MS, Lim YJ, Kim YS, Kim KH, Cho HM. Treatment of the proximal femoral fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). J Korean Fract Soc. 2009;22: 91-7.
  10. Lee KB, LEE BT. Complications of femoral peritrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail (PFN). J Korean Fract Soc. 2007;20:33-9.
  11. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr, Ishizuka T. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41- A:1399-408.
  12. Chung YG, Hwang JH, Kim HK. The treatment of peritrochanteric fracture of femur with proximal femoral nail: Comparative study with dynamic hip screw. J Korean Hip Soc. 2007;19:167-75.
  13. Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:618-30.
  14. Strauss E, Frank J, Lee J, Kummer FJ, Tejwani N. Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. Injury. 2006;37:984-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.06.008
  15. Suh KT, Lee SH, Cho BM. Radiologic analysis of the proximal femoral morphology in normal Korean adults. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1999;34:891-7.
  16. Khang G, Choi KW, Kim CS, Yang JS, Bae TS. A study of Korean femoral geometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 406:116-22.
  17. Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. The morphology of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:28-32.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effectiveness of the Valgus Reduction Technique in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures Using Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation vol.48, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2013.48.6.441