유방의 중심부바늘생검에서 진단된 세포충실성섬유상피병변에서 엽상종양을 예측할 수 있는가?

Can We Predict Phyllodes Tumor among Fibroepithelial Lesions with Cellular Stroma Diagnosed at Breast Core Needle Biopsy?

  • 정혜경 (차의과대학교 영상의학과) ;
  • 고경희 (차의과대학교 영상의학과) ;
  • 노지영 (차의과대학교 영상의학과) ;
  • 문희정 (연세대학교 의과대학 영상의학과) ;
  • 김은경 (연세대학교 의과대학 영상의학과) ;
  • 김민정 (연세대학교 의과대학 영상의학과) ;
  • 박병우 (연세대학교 의과대학 영상의학과)
  • Jung, Hae-Kyoung (Department of Radiology, CHA University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ko, Kyung-Hee (Department of Radiology, CHA University College of Medicine) ;
  • Rho, Ji-Young (Department of Radiology, CHA University College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Hee-Jung (Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Kyung (Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Min-Jung (Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Byeong-Woo (Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2011.06.01

초록

목적: 유방의 중심부바늘생검에서 진단된 세포충실성섬유상피병변(fibroepithelial lesion with cellular stroma)의 수술 후의 진단 결과와 엽상종양을 예측하는 데 도움이 되는 임상적 혹은 영상학적 인자가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 초음파유도하 중심부바늘생검에서 세포충실성섬유상피병변으로 진단되고 수술을 시행하여 최종병리가 확인된 55명을 대상으로 하였다. 병변의 수술 결과에 따라 엽상종양과 엽상종양이 아닌 병변의 두 부류로 나눈 후 각각의 임상과 영상소견을 후향적으로 비교, 분석하였다. 또한, 엽상 종양을 예측하는데 유의한 변수들을 조합하여 분석하였다. 결과: 수술로 확진된 55명의 55예의 병변 중 엽상 종양은 22예(40%), 엽상종양이 아닌 예가 33예(섬유선종 30예(54.6%), 섬유낭종변화 1예(1.8%), 선증 1예(1.8%), 섬유선증증식 1예(1.8%))였다. 엽상종양 22예의 평균 크기는 32.2 ${\pm}$ 14.07 mm (12~55 mm)였고 22명 환자의 평균나이는 43.5 ${\pm}$ 11.60세(18~69세)였으며 엽상종양이 아닌 종양 33예의 평균 크기는 22.4 ${\pm}$ 13.64 mm (12~55 mm), 33명의 평균 나이는 36.5 ${\pm}$ 10.25세(19~62세)로 크기와 나이 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p=0.0078, p=0.0207). 초음파 소견 중에서는 틈새(cleft)가 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보여 엽상종양에서 더 흔하게 관찰되었다(n=14 (70%)/n=6 (30%), p=0.0016). 결론: 유방의 수술 전 중심부바늘생검에서 진단된 세포충실성섬유상피병변 중 병변의 크기, 환자의 나이, 초음파 소견에서 틈새의 유무를 고려하면 엽상종양을 예측할 수 있다.

Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of fibroepithelial lesion with cellular stroma (FELCS) diagnosed at sonography guided core needle biopsy of breast masses, and to determine whether the clinical and imaging features of this lesion could predict the presence of a phyllodes tumor. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the pathologic results of sonography guided core needle biopsy of solid breast masses. A total of 55 FELCS diagnosed with this procedure that underwent subsequent surgical excision were included in this study; their medical records and radiologic images were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The results of the surgical excision revealed 22 (40%) phyllodes tumors and 33 (60%) non-phyllodes tumors: 30 (54.6%) fibroadenomas, 1 (1.8%) adenosis, 1 (1.8%) fibrocystic changes and 1 (1.8%) fibroadenomatous hyperplasia. Lesion size and patient age were significantly different between phyllodes tumors and nonphyllodes tumors groups (32.2 ${\pm}$ 14.07 mm/22.4 ${\pm}$ 13.64 mm, p=0.0078, 43.5 ${\pm}$ 11.60 years/36.5 ${\pm}$ 10.25 years, p=0.0207). Among the sonographic features, only cleft was significantly more visible in phyllodes tumors than in non-phyllodes tumors (n=14 (70%)/n=6 (30%), p=0.0016). Conclusion: The size of the lesions, the age of the patients, and the sonographic features of cleft were the significant helpful variables to predict phyllodes tumors among FELCS diagnosed at breast core biopsy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jacobs TW, Chen YY, Guinee DG, Holden JA, Cha I, Bauermeister DE, et al. Fibroepithelial lesions with cellular stroma on breast core needle biopsy: are there predictors of outcome on surgical excision? Am J Clin Patho 2005;124:342-354 https://doi.org/10.1309/5N2C4N5XCB8XW8JL
  2. Rosen PP. Fibroepithelial lesions. In Rosen's breast pathology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams & Williams, 2001:163-200
  3. Shousha S. Issues in the interpretation of breast core biopsies. Int J Surg Pathol 2003;11:167-176 https://doi.org/10.1177/106689690301100303
  4. Bode MK, Rissanen T, Apaja-Sarkkinen M. Ultrasonography and core needle biopsy in the differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma and tumor phyllodes. Acta Radiol 2007;48:708-713 https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850701367911
  5. Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1095-1110 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200209000-00001
  6. Dershaw DD, Morris Ea, Liberman L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996;198:323-325 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596825
  7. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM, Harvey SC, et al. Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 1998;206:717-720 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494490
  8. Komenaka IK, EL-Tammer M, Pile-Spellman E, Hibshoosh H. Core needle biopsy as a diagnostic tool to differentiate phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma. Arch Surg 2003;138:987-990 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.9.987
  9. Jung HK, Kim EK, Go KH, Rho JY. Phyllodes tumors or fibroepithelial lesions with cellular stroma of breast diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: comparison between results on excision biopsy and sonographic findings. J Korean Soc Ultrasound Med 2011;30:45-53
  10. Stravros AT. Atypical, high-risk, premalignant, and locally aggressive lesions. In: Stavros AT. Breast Utrasound. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001:695-701
  11. Reinfuss M, Mitus J, Duda K, Stelmach A, Rys J, Smolak K. The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast: an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer 1996;77:910-916 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960301)77:5<910::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-6
  12. Salvadori B, Cusumano F, Del Bo R, Delledonne V, Grassi M, Rovini D, et al. Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Cancer 1989;63:2532-2536 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19890615)63:12<2532::AID-CNCR2820631229>3.0.CO;2-Q
  13. Jacklin RK, Ridgway PF, Ziprin P, Healy V, Hadjiminas D, Darzi A. Optimising preoperative diagnosis in phyllodes tumour of the breast. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:454-459 https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.025866
  14. Chao Tc, Lo YF, Chen SC, Chen MF. Sonographic features of phyllodes tumors of the berast. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:64-71 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00736.x
  15. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003