DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alteration of the Static Posture of Spine under Different Types and Amounts of Loading

가방 하중의 크기와 방식에 따른 척추 정적 자세의 변화

  • Park, Yong-Hyun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kwan (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • 박용현 (경희대학교 공과대학 기계공학과) ;
  • 김영관 (경희대학교 공과대학 기계공학과) ;
  • 김윤혁 (경희대학교 공과대학 기계공학과)
  • Received : 2011.02.24
  • Accepted : 2011.04.18
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the alteration of lumbar spine and trunk postures on different load-carrying types and amounts under static loading. Two load-carrying types(unilateral carrying: UC vs. bilateral carrying: BC) and four different loads(0, 5, 10, and 15 kg) were randomly tested in this study. Carrying a heavy bag would affect human body posture, specifically lumbar spine curvature, which is considered as one of sources of back problems. Previous studies have not paid attention to the approach of the multisegment model of the lumbar spine and trunk. This study separated two compartments of trunk segment(the lumbar and thorax) in the analysis. The multisegment model of the lumbar spine in addition to Helen-Hayes marker set was used. Eight motion analysis cameras and a force plate were utilized. Ten male subjects(mean mass, $70.6{\pm}3.97$ kg; mean height, $178{\pm}4.18$ m) having no musculoskeletal disease participated in this study. We analyzed trunk angles in three anatomical planes and the spinal curvature in sagittal and frontal planes. Increased loading in both UC and BC significantly resulted in increases in trunk forward lean but only UC induced increases in trunk lateral lean. In addition, increased loading in BC produced flatten lumbar curvature in sagittal plane. As far as coupling motion, subjects tended to use axial rotation of the lumbar spine in transverse plane in response to increased UC loading. Finally, it is concluded that the increased static loading in UC rather than in BC tends to causes combined alterations of the spinal postures(sagittal and transverse planes together), which would be vulnerable to improper mechanical stresses on the spine.

Keywords

References

  1. Lindstrom-Hazel, D., "The backpack problem is evident but the solution is less obvious," Work, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 329-338, 2009.
  2. Smith, B., Ashton, K.M., Bohl, D., Clark, R.C., Metheny, J.B., and Klassen, S., "Influence of carrying a backpack on pelvic tilt, rotation, and obliquity in female college students," Gait Posture, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 263-7, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.02.009
  3. Brackley, H.M., and Stevenson, J.M., "Are Children's Backpack Weight Limits Enough?: A Critical Review of the Relevant Literature," Spine, vol. 29, no. 19, pp. 2184-2190, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000141183.20124.a9
  4. Kim, J.Y., Park, J.S., and Cho, Y.J., "Biomechanical Measuring Techniques for Evaluation of Workload," J. Erg. Soc. Korea, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 445-453, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.4.445
  5. Devroey, C., Jonkers, I., de Becker, A., Lenaerts, G., and Spaepen, A., "Evaluation of the effect of backpack load and position during standing and walking using biomechanical, physiological and subjective measures," Ergonomics, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 728-742, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701194850
  6. Negrini, S., and Negrini, A., "Postural effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical loads on the spines of schoolchildren," Scoliosis, vol. 2:8, pp.1-7, 2007.
  7. Brackley, H.M., Stevenson, J.M., and Selinger, J.C., "Effect of backpack load placement on posture and spinal curvature in prepubescent children," Work, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 351-360, 2009.
  8. Birrell, S.A., and Haslam, R.A., "The effect of military load carriage on 3-D lower limb kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters," Ergonomics, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1298-304, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903003115
  9. Al-Khabbaz, Y.S.S.M., Shimada, T., and Hasegawa, M., "The effect of backpack heaviness on trunk-lower extremity muscle activities and trunk posture," Gait Posture, vol, 28, no. 2, pp. 297-302, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.002
  10. Hong, Y. and Brueggemann, G., "Changes in gait patterns in 10-year-old boys with increasing loads when walking on a treadmill," Gait Posture, vol. 11, pp. 254-259, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00055-2
  11. Chansirinukor, W., Wilson, D., Grimmer, K., and Dansie, B., "Effects of backpacks on students: measurement of cervical and shoulder posture," Aust. J. Physiother., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 110-116, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60302-0
  12. Hong, Y., and Cheung, C., "Gait and posture responses to backpack load during level walking in children," Gait Posture, vol.17, no. 1, pp. 28-33, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00050-4
  13. Hong, Y., Li, J.X., and Fong, D.T.-P., "Effect of prolonged walking with backpack loads on trunk muscle activity and fatigue in children," J. Electromyogr. Kines., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 990-996, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.06.013
  14. Li, J.X., Hong, Y., and Robinson, P.D., "The effect of loadin children during walking," Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 90, pp. 35-43, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0848-9
  15. Singh, T. and Koh, M., "Lower limb dynamics change for children while walking with backpack loads to modulate shock transmission to the head," J. Biomech., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 736-742, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.035
  16. Fathallah, F.A., Marras, W.S., and Parnianpour, M., "An assessment of complex spinal loads during dynamic lifting tasks," Spine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 706-16, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199803150-00012
  17. Fowler, N.E., Rodacki, A.L., and Rodacki, C.D., "Changes in stature and spine kinematics during a loaded walking task," Gait Posture, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133-41, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.12.006
  18. de Leva, P., "Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters," J. Biomech, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1223-30, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)00178-6
  19. Kim, Y.H., Yang, G.T., and Mun, M.S., "Motion analysis of treadmill walking with various slopes at a normal speed," J. of Biomed. Eng. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp.71-78, 1997.
  20. Sohn, R.H., Choi, H.S., Son, J.S., Hwang, S.J., and Kim, Y.H., "The Comparison of Overground Walking and Treadmill Walking According to the Walking Speed: Motion Analysis and Energy Consumption," J. of Biomed. Eng. Res., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 226-232, 2009.
  21. Field, A., Discovering statistics, Wiltshire, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2000
  22. Vacheron, J.J., Poumarat, G., Chandezon, R., and Vanneuville, G., "Changes of contour of the spine caused by load carrying," Surg. Radiol. Anat., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 109-113, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-999-0109-7
  23. Little, J., Pearcy, M., and Adam, C., "Coupled rotations in the lumbar spine-are these a consequence of passive spinal anatomy?," in Proc. 7th International conference on Modelling in Medicine and Biology, New Forest, United Kingdom, 2007, pp. 83-92.
  24. Edmondston, S.J., Aggerholm, M., Elfving, S., Flores, N., Ng, C., Smith, R., and Netto, K., "Influence of posture on the range of axial rotation and coupled lateral flexion of the thoracic spine," J. Manip Physiol Ther, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 193-9, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.01.010
  25. Baisden, J.L., Stemper, B.D., Barnes, D., Yognandan, N., and Pintar, F.A., "Normative Lumbar Spine Coupling Relationships between Axial Rotation and Lateral Bending," The Spine J. vol. 10, no. 9, pp. S124-S124. 2010.
  26. Marras, W.S. and Granata, K.P., "Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions," J. Biomech., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 697-703, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00010-9

Cited by

  1. Alteration of the Spine Shape Depending on the Wearing Method and Type of Baby Carrier vol.26, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2017.26.5.435