한국간담췌외과학회지 (Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery)

  • 제15권4호
  • /
  • Pages.243-247
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2508-5778(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-5859(eISSN)
한국간담췌외과학회 (The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery)
권호 표지

Complication analysis of distal pancreatectomy based on early personal experience

  • Park, Sung-Jin (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Seo, Hyung-Il (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Go, Soo-Hee (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yun, Sung-Pil (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Yeon (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2011.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Backgrounds/Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between initial personal experiences with distal pancreatectomy and perioperative risk factors, outcomes, and management of pancreatic fistulas. Methods: Between May, 2007 and May, 2010, a total of 28 patients who had undergone elective distal pancreatectomy were evaluated for this study. Perioperative factors and the occurrence of pancreatic fistula were analyzed on the basis of International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) criteria. Results: There were sixteen cases of benign neoplasms and twelve cases of malignant tumors. The remnant pancreas was manually sutured with ligation of the pancreatic duct (n=14), auto-suture stapling along with manual sutures (n=12), or stapling alone (n=2). According to the ISGPF classification, morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic fistulas was 42.9% (n=12) and 0%, respectively. These pancreatic fistulae were classified as grade A in 8 cases (28.6%), grade B in 3 cases (10.7%), and grade C in one case (3.6%). All patients with pancreatic fistula were treated conservatively. Conclusions: Perioperative factors do not affect the risk of pancreatic fistula. Adequate drainage is the most effective method for management of a pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim HS, Jo HJ, Jeon TY, Sim MS. Factors influencing the pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2001;5:147-154.
  2. Harris LJ, Abdollahi H, Newhook T, et al. Optimal technical management of stump closure following distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective review of 215 cases. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:998-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1185-z
  3. Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1691-1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0636-2
  4. Yoshioka R, Saiura A, Koga R, et al. Risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: analysis of consecutive 100 patients. World J Surg 2010;34:121-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0300-3
  5. Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure. Ann Surg 1987;206:358-365. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198709000-00014
  6. Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 1995;130:295-299. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030065013
  7. Aldridge MC, Williamson RC. Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy. Br J Surg 1991;78:976-979. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800780827
  8. Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y, et al. Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:250-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1390-9
  9. Sledzianowski JF, Duffas JP, Muscari F, Suc B, Fourtanier F. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 2005;137:180-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.063
  10. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
  11. Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg 2007;245:443-451. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000251708.70219.d2
  12. Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg 2008;32:419-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9388-5
  13. Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 2009;250:277-281. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ae34be
  14. Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 2008;143:956-965. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.10.956
  15. Zhou W, Lv R, Wang X, Mou Y, Cai X, Herr I. Stapler vs suture closure of pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2010;200:529-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.022
  16. Seeliger H, Christians S, Angele MK, et al. Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2010;200:311-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.022
  17. Sheehan MK, Beck K, Creech S, Pickleman J, Aranha GV. Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am Surg 2002;68:264-267.
  18. Kajiyama Y, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Akiyama H. Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases. Br J Surg 1996;83:1711. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800831216
  19. Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 2003;73:922-925. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02821.x
  20. Bilimoria MM, Cormier JN, Mun Y, Lee JE, Evans DB, Pisters PW. Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation. Br J Surg 2003;90:190-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4032
  21. Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Yoshida H, Tajiri T. Clinical outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009;16:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-0007-0
  22. Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, Beckett L, Bold RJ. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2002;183:237-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00790-0