DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modified Radiology-Guided Percutaneous Gastrostomy (MRPG) for Patients with Complete Obstruction of the Upper Digestive Tract and Who are without Endoscopic or Nasogastric Access

  • Chan, Siu-Cheung (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Keelung Hospital) ;
  • Chu, Winnie Chiu-Wing (Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Liu, Kar-Wai (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Keelung Hospital) ;
  • Liao, Chun-Ta (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Tsung-Shih (Department of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Keelung Hospital) ;
  • Ng, Shu-Hang (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Keelung Hospital)
  • Published : 2011.04.01

Abstract

Objective: We wanted to report on our experience with modified radiology-guided percutaneous gastrostomy (MRPG) without endoscopic or nasogastric access for treating patients with complete obstruction of the upper digestive tract. Materials and Methods: Fourteen oncology patients (13 had hypopharyngeal cancer and 1 had upper esophageal cancer) with complete obstruction of the upper digestive tract were recruited. Conventional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and radiologic (fluoroscopy-guided) percutaneous gastrostomy (RPG) were not feasible in all the patients. An MRPG technique (with a combination of ultrasound, an air enema and fluoroscopic guidance) was performed in these patients. Results: We achieved successfully percutaneous gastrostomy using the modified technique in all patients without any major or minor complications after the procedure. Conclusion: A modified radiology-guided percutaneous gastrostomy technique can be safely performed in patients who failed to receive conventional PEG or RPG due to the absence of nasogastric access in the completely obstructed upper digestive tract.

Keywords

References

  1. Copeland EM 3rd, Daly JM, Dudrick SJ. Nutritional concepts in the treatment of head and neck malignancies. Head Neck Surg 1979;1:350-365 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890010408
  2. Pezner RD, Archambeau JO, Lipsett JA, Kokal WA, Thayer W, Hill LR. Tube feeding enteral nutritional support in patients receiving radiation therapy for advanced head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987;13:935-939 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(87)90110-6
  3. Lee JH, Machtay M, Unger LD, Weinstein GS, Weber RS, Chalian AA, et al. Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes in patients undergoing intensive irradiation for cancer of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:871-875 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.124.8.871
  4. Wollman B, D'Agostino HB. Percutaneous radiologic and endoscopic gastrostomy: a 3-year institutional analysis of procedure performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1551- 1553 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.6.9393163
  5. Laasch HU, Wilbraham L, Bullen K, Marriott A, Lawrance JA, Johnson RJ, et al. Gastrostomy insertion: comparing the options--PEG, RIG or PIG? Clin Radiol 2003;58:398-405 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00058-8
  6. Chan SC, Ko SF, Ng SH, Cheung YC, Chang JT, Liao CT, et al. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy with modifi ed gastropexy and a large-bore balloon-retained catheter in patients with head and neck tumors. Acta Radiol 2004;45:130-135 https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850410003707
  7. Seo TS, Song HY, Lee JH, Ko GY, Sung KB, Lim JO, et al. Newly designed sheaths for gastroduodenal intervention: an experimental study in a phantom and dogs. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:114-120 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.2.114
  8. Given MF, Hanson JJ, Lee MJ. Interventional radiology techniques for provision of enteral feeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005;28:692-703 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-7021-7
  9. Laasch HU, Martin DF. Radiologic gastrostomy. Endoscopy 2007;39:247-255 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-945119
  10. Wills JS, Oglesby JT. Percutaneous gastrostomy. Radiology 1983;149:449-453 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.149.2.6414043
  11. Ho CS. Percutaneous gastrostomy for jejunal feeding. Radiology 1983;149:595-596 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.149.2.6414046
  12. Tao HH, Gillies RR. Percutaneous feeding gastrostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141:793-794 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.141.4.793
  13. Barkmeier JM, Trerotola SO, Wiebke EA, Sherman S, Harris VJ, Snidow JJ, et al. Percutaneous radiologic, surgical endoscopic, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy: comparative study and cost analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1998;21:324-328 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900269
  14. Rosenzweig TB, Palestrant AM, Esplin CA, Gilsdorf RB. A method for radiologic-assisted gastrostomy when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is contraindicated. Am J Surg 1994;168:587-590 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80127-8

Cited by

  1. RE: Tips and Tricks of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Under Image Guidance in Patients with Limited Access vol.12, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2011.12.5.648
  2. Gastrostomy Tube Placement Without Nasogastric Tube: A Retrospective Evaluation in 85 Patients vol.35, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0321-9
  3. Radiologic Percutaneous Gastrostomy: Review of Potential Complications and Approach to Managing the Unexpected Outcome vol.200, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.11.7804
  4. Radiologic Percutaneous Gastrostomy in Nondistended Stomach: A Modified Approach vol.39, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1304-7
  5. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy in patients with failed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy vol.6, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18528/gii160031
  6. Comment je fais une gastrostomie percutanée radiologique ? vol.1, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jidi.2018.07.001
  7. Modified percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy technique without endoscopic or nasogastric access vol.50, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-019-0086-8