Neuro-Anatomical Evaluation of Human Suitability for Rural and Urban Environment by Using fMRI

자연과 도시환경의 인체친화성에 대한 신경해부학적 평가: 기능적 자기공명영상법

  • Kim, Gwang-Won (Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Song, Jin-Kyu (Architectural Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Gwang-Woo (Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • 김광원 (전남대학교 대학원 의공학협동과정) ;
  • 송진규 (전남대학교 공과대학 건축학부) ;
  • 정광우 (전남대학교 대학원 의공학협동과정)
  • Received : 2010.12.23
  • Accepted : 2011.03.02
  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify different cerebral areas of the human brain associated with rural and urban picture stimulation using a 3.0 Tesla functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and further to investigate the human suitability for rural and urban environments. A total of 27 right-handed participants (mean age: $27.3{\pm}3.7$) underwent fMRI study on a 3.0T MR scanner. The brain activation patterns were induced by visual stimulation with each rural and urban sceneries. The participants were divided into two groups as 26 subjects favorable to rural scenery and 14 subjects unfavorable to urban scenery based on their filled-in questionnaire. The differences of the brain activation in response to two extreme types of pictures by the two sample t-test were characterized as follows: the activation areas observed in rural scenery over urban were the insula, middle frontal gyrus, precuneus, caudate nucleus, superior parietal gyrus, superior occipital gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and globus pallidus. In urban scenery over rural, the inferior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, postcentral gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, amygdala, and posterior cingulate gyrus were activated. The fMRI patterns also clearly show that rural scenery elevated positive emotion such as happiness and comfort. On the contrary, urban scenery elevated negative emotion, resulting in activation of the amygdala which is the key region for the feelings of fear, anxiety and unpleasantness. This study evaluated differential cerebral areas of the human brain associated with rural and urban picture stimulation using a 3.0 Tesla fMRI. These findings will be useful as an objective evaluation guide to human suitability for ecological environments that are related to brain activation with joy, anger, sorrow and pleasure.

본 연구에서는 3.0 Tesla 기능적 자기공명영상법(function magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI)을 이용하여 자연과 도시풍경의 시각 자극에 따른 대뇌중추의 활성화 영역의 차이점을 규명하고, 아울러 대뇌 부위별 활성화 양상의 차이점을 정량적으로 분석하여 자연과 도시의 생활환경을 인체친화성과 관련하여 신경해부학적 측면에서 연구하고자 하였다. 오른손잡이 정상인 27명(평균 $27.3{\pm}3.7$세)을 대상으로 3.0T MRI를 사용하여 기능적 자기공명영상을 얻었다. 대뇌의 활성화를 유도하기 위한 시각 자극 패러다임은 3번의 휴지기와 2번의 활성기로 구성되어 있고, 각각의 휴지기와 활성기 지속시간은 30초와 120초로 하였다. 전체 피험자 27예의 설문결과를 바탕으로 자연풍경을 선호한 26예와 도시풍경을 비선호한 14예를 두 그룹으로 나눈 후 활성화 양상을 비교하였다. 자연과 도시풍경 간의 대뇌 활성화 양상을 비교한 결과, 도시풍경에 비하여 자연풍경을 보았을 때 유의한 수준(p<0.05)에서 활성화를 보인 영역은 뇌섬엽, 중전두회, 설전부, 미상핵, 상두정회, 상후두회, 방추상회, 창백핵이었으며, 도시풍경에서는 하전두회, 해마방회, 중심후회, 상측두회, 편도체, 후대상회 영역에서 우세한 활성화가 관찰되었다. 자연풍경에서는 도시풍경에 비해 주로 긍정적 정서와 관련된 영역에서 활성화가 나타난 반면, 도시풍경에서는 두려움, 공포, 불쾌감을 느낄 때 반응하는 편도체와 같은 부정적 정서와 관련된 영역에서 활성화가 나타났다. 본 연구에서는 3.0T 기능적 자기공명영상법 이용하여 자연과 도시풍경의 시각 자극에 따른 대뇌중추의 활성화 양상의 차이점을 신경해부학적인 측면에서 정성 정량적으로 평가할 수 있었고, 이러한 결과는 인간이 본능적으로 느낄 수 있는 희로애락의 감정에 따른 대뇌 활성화와 관련하여 생태환경의 인체 친화성과 쾌적성에 대한 객관적인 평가 지표로서 응용될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 revision. New York (2003)
  2. Bolund P, Hunhammar S: Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293-301 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
  3. Chiesura A: The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc Urban Plan 68:129-138 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
  4. Kaplan R, Kaplan S: The experience of nature, a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
  5. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M: Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201-230 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
  6. Laumann K, Garling T, Stormark KM: Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 23:125-134 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00110-X
  7. Bakana WH, Young DW: Community coping skills enhanced by an adventure camp for adult chronic psychiatric patients. Hosp Community Psychiatry 36:746-748 (1985)
  8. Kuo FE, Sullivan WC: Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environ Behav 33:343-367 (2001)
  9. Taylor AF, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC: Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. J Environ Psychol 22:49-63 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0241
  10. Ulrich RS: Natural versus urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ Behav 13:523-556 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581135001
  11. Nakamurea R, Fujii E: A ccomparative study of the characteristics of the electroencephalogram when observing a hedge and a concrete block fence. J Jpn Inst Landscape Arch 55:139-144 (1992)
  12. Phelps ME, Magiota JC: Positron emission tomography and brain imaging. Science 228:299-309 (1995)
  13. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P: Oxygenation- sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 14:68-78 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910140108
  14. Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I: Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 16:331-348 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
  15. Lane RD, Chua PM, Dolan RJ: Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia 37:989-997 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00017-2
  16. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Fitzsimmons JR, et al: Emotional arousal and activation of the visual cortex: an fMRI analysis. Psychophysiology 35:199-210 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3520199
  17. Frahm J, Merboldt K, Hanicke W: Functional MRI of human brain activation at high spatial resolution. Magn Reson Med 29;139-144 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910290126
  18. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, et al: Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9868-9872 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.24.9868
  19. Ueda K, Okamoto Y, Okada G, Yamashita H, Hori T, Yamawaki S: Brain activity during expectancy of emotional stimuli: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 14:51-55 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200301200-00010
  20. Damasio AR: Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. A Crosset-Putnam Book, New York (1994)
  21. Lee JM, Jeong GW, Kim HJ, et al: Qualitative and quantitative measurement of human brain activity using pixel subtraction algorithm. J Korean Radiol Soc 51:165-177 (2004) https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2004.51.2.165
  22. Lee JS, Son KC: Effects of indoor plant and various colors' stimuli on the changes of brain activity and emotional responses. J Korean Soc Hort Sci 40:772-776 (1999)
  23. Kaya N, Epps HH: Color-emotion associations: past experience and personal preference. Color and Paints, Interim Meeting of the International Color Association (2004).
  24. Lee SH, Blake R, Heeger DJ: Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 10:1048-1054 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1939
  25. Lane RD, Reiman EM, Ahern GL, Schwartz GE, Davidson RJ: Neuroanatomical correlates of happiness, sadness, and disgust. Am J Psychiatry 154:926-933 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.7.926
  26. Kaplan JT, Freedman J, Iacoboni M: Us versus them: political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates. Neuropsychologia 45:55-64 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.024
  27. Fletcher PC, Frith CD, Baker SC, Shallice T, Frackowiak RS, Dolan RJ: The mind's eye-precuneus activation in memory related imagery. Neuroimage 2:195-200 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1995.1025
  28. Yonelinas AP, Hopfinger JB, Buonocore MH, Kroll NEA, Baynes K: Hippocampal, parahippocampal and occipital- temporal contributions to associative and item recognition memory: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 12:359-363 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200102120-00035
  29. Bremner JD, Vermetten E, Vythilingam M, et al: Neural correlates of the classic color and emotional stroop in women with abuse-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 55:612-620 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.001
  30. Lazar SW, Bush G, Gollub RL, et al: Functional brain mapping of the relaxation response and meditation. Neuroreport 11:1581-1585 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200005150-00041
  31. Siebert M, Markowitsch HJ, Bartel P: Amygdala, affect and cognition: evidence from 10 patients with urbach-wiethe disease. Brain 126:2627-2637 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg271
  32. Bartels A, Zeki S: The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport 11:3829-3834 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200011270-00046
  33. Posner MI, Dehaene S: Attentional networks. Trends in Neurosci 17:75-79 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(94)90078-7
  34. Ross ED: The aprosodias: functional-anatomical organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere. Archives of Neurology 38:561-569 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1981.00510090055006
  35. Simons JS, Koutstaal W, Prince S, Wagner AD, Schacter D: Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. Neuroimage 19:613-626 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00096-X
  36. Whalen PJ, Bush G, Mcnally RJ, et al: The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division. Biol Psychiatry 44:1219-1228 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00251-0
  37. Davidson RJ, Irwin W: The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends Cogn Sci 3:11-21 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01265-0
  38. Davidson RJ, Ekman P, Saron C, Senulis J, Friesen WV: Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology. I J Pers Soc Psychol 58:330-341 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.330
  39. Sinha R, Lacadie C, Skudlarski P, Wexler BE: Neural circuits underlying emotional distress in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1032:254-257 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1314.032
  40. Kross E, Egner T, Ochsner K, Hirsch J, Downey G: Neural dynamics of rejection sensitivity. J Cogn Neurosci 19:945-956 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.945