Physiological Evaluation of Cloned Mini-pigs in a Transportable Isolator for the Study of Xenotransplantation

바이오장기 연구를 위한 이동식 아이솔레이터 내 복제 미니 돼지의 생리 활성 평가

  • Kim, Hae-Sung (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeon, Yu-Byeol (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kwak, Seong-Sung (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seung-A (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jung, Eui-Man (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Hyun, Sang-Hwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeung, Eui-Bae (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2011.08.02
  • Accepted : 2011.08.19
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

The present study investigated the physiological evaluation of cloned mini-pigs in a transportable isolator. Transportable isolator was designed and manufactured by our research team for transporting gnotobiotic pig. Until now, no previous reports are available regarding the physiological activities and harmful effects when pigs were transported in this isolator. Five cloned mini-pigs of 1~2 year (s) old female with a body weight between 80~90 kg were used. The effects of transportable isolator on stress-related hormone, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels, and heart rate were evaluated. In addition, it was also examined the effects of transportable isolator on blood chemistry factors (alanine aminotransferase: ALT, aspartate aminotransferase: AST, blood urea nitrogen: BUN, glucose, and creatinine). Blood was sampled just before the beginning of transport (T0), at the end of transport (30min after the transport; T1), and 30 min after the end of transport (T2). At the same time, heart rate was also evaluated. As a result, heart rate had no significant (p>0.05) differences at the various-time points of study (T0, T1, T2). However, heart rate was slightly higher than normal range in T1 and T2. The ACTH level was higher than normal range. Whereas, the cortisol level was lower than normal range. There were no statistical significant differences both ACTH and cortisol level between different time groups. Also, there were no significant differences in blood chemistry factors. Therefore, our present study shows that transportable isolator has no harmful effect on stress and physiological condition in cloned mini-pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. Aigner B, Renner S, Kessler B, Klymiuk N, Kurome M, Wünsch A and Wolf E. 2010. Transgenic pigs as models for translational biomedical research. J. Mol. Med. 88:653-664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-010-0610-9
  2. Beal CB, Espinosa H, Stites DP and Watson MJ. 1967. A surgical wound isolator. Lancet. 1:97-101.
  3. Betts TE, Firmin R and Guerreiro D. 1985. The use of a flexible film isolator to maintain specified concentrations of oxygen. Lab. Anim. 19:109-110. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367785780942660
  4. Boot R and Walvoort HC. 1984. Vertical transmission of Bacillus piliformis infection (Tyzzer's disease) in a guinea pig: case report. Lab. Anim. 18:195-199. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367784780891244
  5. Cooper DM and Timms JR. 1972. The rearing and maintenance of breeding chickens in isolators: 2. Plastic tent isolators. Avian Pathol. 1:59-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457208418052
  6. Dehoux JP and Gianello P. 2007. The importance of large animal models in transplantation. Front. Biosci. 12:4864-4880. https://doi.org/10.2741/2434
  7. Hyun SH. 2003. Production and characterization of cloned pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Graduate School Seoul National University, Seoul, pp. 155.
  8. Jankord R, Ganjam VK, Turk JR, Hamilton MT and Laughlin MH. 2008. Exercise training alters effect of high-fat feeding on the ACTH stress response in pigs. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 33: 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1139/H08-022
  9. Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, Faber D, Sweeney RW, Henderson B, Nevala W, West MD and Wettstein PJ. 2001. Cloned cattle can be healthy and normal. Science 294:1893-1894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063440
  10. Matsunari H and Nagashima H. 2009. Application of genetically modified and cloned pigs in translational research. J. Reprod. Dev. 55:225-230.
  11. Meyer DJ, Coles EH and Rich LJ. 1992. Veterinary Laboratory medicine; Interpretation and diagnosis. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 328-331.
  12. Perez-Torres S, Flores-Perez FI, Orihuela A, Aguirre V, Bernal G, Nieto A, Vazquez R and Solano JJ. 2011. Influence of tongue inspection during cysticercosis diagnosis on some behavioral and physiological stress measures in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). Trop. Anim. Health Prod. Epub ahead of print.
  13. Perremans S, Randall J, Rombouts G, Decuypere E and Geers R. 2001. Effect of whole-body vibration in the vertical axis on cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone levels in piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 975-981. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.794975x
  14. Perremans S, Randall J, Allegaert L, Stiles M, Rombouts G and Geers R. 1998. Influence of vertical vibration on heart rate of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76: 416-420. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.762416x
  15. Pilgrim HI. 1969. A lightweight autoclavable free-flow germfree mouse isolator. Lab. Anim. Care. 19:117-120.
  16. Pilgrim HI and Thompson DB. 1963. An inexpensive, autoclavable germfree mouse isolator. Lab. Anim. Care. 13:suppl. 602-608.
  17. Pollard M. 1964. Germfree animals and biological research. Science 145: 247-251. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3629.247
  18. Prather RS, Shen M and Dai Y. 2008. Genetically modified pigs for medicine and agriculture. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 25:245-265.
  19. Trexler PC. 1971. Microbiological isolation of large animals. Vet. Rec. 88:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.88.1.15
  20. Trexler PC and Reynolds LI. 1957. Flexible film apparatus for the rearing and use of germfree animals. Appl. Microbiol. 5:406-412.
  21. Trexler PC and Orcutt RP. 1999. Development of gnotobiotics and contamination control in laboratory animal science. 50 Years of Laboratory Animal Science. AALAS, Memphis, pp. 121-128.
  22. Vodicka P, Smetana K Jr, Dvoránkova B, Emerick T, Xu YZ, Ourednik J, Ourednik V and Motlík J. 2005. The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1049:161-171.