Anxiety and mood (대한불안의학회지)

Korean Academy of Anxiety Disorders (대한불안의학회)
권호 표지

Development and Standardization of Modified Self-Assessment Manikin for Emotional Valence and Arousal Manikin

정서가 및 각성수준에 대한 자가 평가 마네킹 척도개발 및 표준화

  • Kang, Eun-Ho (Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jeong-Eun (Korean Employee Assistant Professionals Association) ;
  • Ham, Byung-Joo (Department of Neuropsychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Seok, Jeong-Ho (Department of Neuropsychiatry,Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyoung-Uk (Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Won (Department of Neuropsychiatry, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hwan (Department of Neuropsychiatry, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Kook (Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Young-Min (Department of Neuropsychiatry, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Jong-Chul (Department of Neuropsychiatry, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Ahn, Meekyung (Paeck-Sang Neuropsychiatric Clinic) ;
  • Lee, Jae Seon (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Chae, Jeong-Ho (Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • 강은호 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 최정은 (한국EAP협회) ;
  • 함병주 (고려대학교 의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 석정호 (연세대학교 의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 이경욱 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 김원 (인제대학교 의과대학 서울백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 이승환 (인제대학교 의과대학 일산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 임현국 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 박영민 (인제대학교 의과대학 일산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 양종철 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 안미경 (백상 정신과) ;
  • 이재선 ;
  • 채정호 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 정신건강의학교실)
  • Received : 2011.08.31
  • Accepted : 2011.10.19
  • Published : 2011.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) developed by Bradley and Lang is a non-verbal pictorial assessment tool that measures human emotion and has been widely used. However, the pictures in SAM have not been easy for Korean subjects to understand or relate to. The authors developed a new manikin (Emotional Valence and Arousal Manikin, EVAS) modeling it after Korean faces while modifying and standardizing the SAM. Methods : Forty-one healthy subjects participated in this study. They were asked to rate the emotional valence and level of arousal using both the SAM and EVAS after being exposed to pictures of facial expressions for affective neurosciences-Korean version. The internal consistency of the EVAS and the correlation between EVAS and SAM were examined. Resuts : Internal consistencies of the valence using the EVAS were from 0.63 (surprise) to 0.82 (happiness) and those of the arousal were from 0.90 to 0.95. Correlation coefficients of the valence and arousal between the SAM and EVAS were from 0.61 (both surprise and disgust) to 0.84 (neutral) and from 0.82 (sadness) to 0.94 (fear), respectively. Conclusions : We developed a new manikin (the EVAS) for the Korean population modifying and standardizing the SAM. The EVAS demonstrated a good internal consistency and validity. As such, it can be used in the field of human emotion research.

Keywords

References

  1. Willis ML, Palermo R, Burke D. Judging approachability on the face of it: The influence of face and body expressions on the perception of approachability. Emotion 2011;11:514-523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022571
  2. Mikels JA, Maglio SJ, Reed AE, Kaplowitz LJ. Should I go with my gut? Investigating the benefits of emotion-focused decision making. Emotion;2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023986
  3. Lechuga J, Fernandez NP. Assimilation and Individual Differences in Emotion: The Dynamics of Anger and Approach Motivation. Int J Intercult Relat 2011;35:196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.11.012
  4. Bourke C, Douglas K, Porter R. Processing of facial emotion expression in major depression: a review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2010;44:681- 696. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2010.496359
  5. Etkin A. Functional neuroanatomy of anxiety: a neural circuit perspective. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2010;2:251-277.
  6. Benes FM. Amygdalocortical circuitry in schizophrenia: from circuits to molecules. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010;35:239-257. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.116
  7. Mehrabian A, Russell JA. The basic emotional impact of environments. Percept Mot Skills 1974;38:283-301. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1974.38.1.283
  8. Lang PJ, ed. Beharioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. Technology in mental health care delivery systems, ed. J.H. Sidowski, J. Williams, and T.A. Williams. 1980, Norwood: NJ:Ablex. 119-137.
  9. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1994;25:49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
  10. Birbaumer N, Veit R, Lotze M, Erb M, Hermann C, Grodd W, et al. Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:799-805. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.799
  11. Feldner MT, Zvolensky MJ, Eifert GH, Spira AP. Emotional avoidance: an experimental test of individual differences and response suppression using biological challenge. Behav Res Ther 2003;41:403-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00020-7
  12. Veit R, Flor H, Erb M, Hermann C, Lotze M, Grodd W, et al. Brain circuits involved in emotional learning in antisocial behavior and social phobia in humans. Neurosci Lett 2002;328:233-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00519-0
  13. Kirsch P, Esslinger C, Chen Q, Mier D, Lis S, Siddhanti S, et al. Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. J Neurosci 2005;25:11489-11493. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3984-05.2005
  14. APA, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed, ed. APA. 1994, Washington, DC.
  15. Lee WH, Chae JH, Bahk WM, Lee KU. Development and its preliminary standardization of pictures of facial expressions for affective neurosciences. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2004;43:552-558.
  16. Ekman P, Friesen WV, Pictures of facial affect. 1976, Palo Alto, California.
  17. Elfenbein HA, Ambady N. When familiarity breeds accuracy: cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;85: 276-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.276
  18. Kohler CG, Turner TH, Gur RE, Gur RC. Recognition of facial emotions in neuropsychiatric disorders. CNS Spectr 2004;9:267-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900009202
  19. Ekman P, Friesen WV, O'Sullivan M, Chan A, Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis I, Heider K, et al. Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;53:712-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.712
  20. Rahko J, Paakki JJ, Starck T, Nikkinen J, Remes J, Hurtig T, et al. Functional mapping of dynamic happy and fearful facial expression processing in adolescents. Brain Imaging Behav 2010;4:164-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-010-9096-x
  21. Kohler CG, Turner TH, Bilker WB, Brensinger CM, Siegel SJ, Kanes SJ, et al. Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: intensity effects and error pattern. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:1768-1774. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.10.1768
  22. Davis M. The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety. Annu Rev Neurosci 1992;15:353-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.002033
  23. Gorman JM, Kent JM, Sullivan GM, Coplan JD. Neuroanatomical hypothesis of panic disorder, revised. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:493-505. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.493