DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지반특성에 따른 동조질량감쇠기의 지진응답특성 및 최적설계변수

Investigation on Seismic-Response Characteristics and Optimal Design Parameters of Tuned Mass Damper Considering Site Effects

  • 강경수 (동명대학교 건축공학과)
  • Kang, Kyung-Soo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Tongmyong University)
  • 투고 : 2011.10.31
  • 심사 : 2011.11.10
  • 발행 : 2011.11.30

초록

기존 동조질량감쇠기의 최적설계변수에 관한 연구는 풍하중과 같은 조화하중을 받는 구조물을 대상으로 연구가 수행되었다. 본 연구에서는 수치해석을 통하여 지진하중이 작용하는 건축물에 설치되는 동조질량감쇠기의 최적 감쇠비와 동조진동수비를 구하였다. 지반특성을 단단한 지반, 연약지반, 단층 근처 지반으로 분류하고, 이들 지반특성을 고려한 수치해석을 통해 구한 동조질량감쇠기의 설계변수를 기존 연구 결과와 비교하였다. 수치해석결과 본 연구로부터 구해진 동조질량감쇠기의 설계변수값을 적용한 경우 지진하중에 의한 응답제어에 기존 연구를 통해 얻어진 변수값을 적용한 경우에 비해 더 나은 제어효과를 얻을 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Most previous studies for finding optimal design parameters of a tuned mass damper(TMD) have been focused on the harmonic excited single-degree-of freedom system. In this study, optimal values of damping ratio and tuning frequency ratio of a TMD applied to control a seismically excited structure are investigated through numerical analyses. Considering that the structural responses due to earthquake loads are strongly dependent on the soil condition, the site effects on the optimal parameters of the TMD are studied and compared to those presented by previous studies. Numerical analyses results indicate that better control performance can be obtained by using the parameters proposed by this study in the seismic application of the TMD.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. T.T. Soong and G.F. Dargush, "Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering", New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
  2. D. Hartog, "Mechanical Vibrations", McGraw Hill: New York, pp. 93-.106, 1956.
  3. G.B. Warburton, "Optimal Absorber Parameters for Various Combinations of Response and Excitation Parameters", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.10, pp. 381-401, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100304
  4. H.C. Tsai and G.C. Lin, "Optimum tuned mass dampers for minimizing steady-state response of support-excited and damped systems", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, No. 22, pp. 957-973, 1993.
  5. A. Kareem, S. Kline, "Performance of multiple mass dampers under random loading". Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.121, No.2, pp. 348-360, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:2(348)
  6. J.M. Verdirame and S.A. Nayfeh, "Design of multi degree of freedom tuned mass dampers based on eigenvalue perturbation". In 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE /AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA 2003-1686, 2003.
  7. L. Zuo, and S.A.Nayfeh, "The two-degree-of-freedom tuned-mass damper for suppression of single-mode vibration under random and harmonic excitation", Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol.128, No.1, pp. 56-65, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2128639
  8. H.N. Li and X.L. Ni, "Optimization of non-uniformly distributed multiple tuned mass damper", Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol.308, No.1-2, pp. 80-97, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.014
  9. F. Sadek, B. Mohraz, A.W. Taylor and R.M. Chung, "A Method of Estimating The Parameters of Tuned mass Dampers for Seismic Application", Earthquake Engng and Struct. Dyn, Vol. 26, pp. 617-635, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z
  10. R. Rana, T.T. Soong, "Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers", Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 193-204, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00078-3
  11. SAC Steel Project, Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project, Report No. SAC/BD-97/04, 1997.