Comparison of Two Methods for Heparin Sensitivity; Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Assay using in vitro Heparin-spiked Sample and Anti-Xa Assay using in vivo Heparin-treated Sample

  • Koo, Bon-Kyung (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kwon, Eui-Hoon (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Ryu, Kwang-Hyun (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Yun, Jae-Won (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jin (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center)
  • Received : 2011.11.07
  • Accepted : 2011.11.30
  • Published : 2011.12.30

Abstract

The monitoring of heparin therapy is using almost aPTT assay. This study is compare to estimating aPTT therapeutic range using in vitro heparin-spiked sample and aPTT therapeutic range using in vivo heparin-treated sample. Normal pooled plasma was collected from 20 healthy representative individuals. 11 concentration of heparinized plasmas from 0 U/mL to 1.0 U/mL at intervals of 0.1 U/mL made by addition of heparin to normal pooled plasma were measured aPTT. The aPTT therapeutic range was performed through correlation analysis between heparin level 0.2 to 0.4 U/mL and aPTT. 30 plasmas from patients on heparin therapy were measured aPTT and anti-Xa activity. The aPTT therapeutic range was performed through correlation analysis between anti-Xa activity 0.3 to 0.7 U/mL and aPTT. The aPTT therapeutic range corresponded by heparin level-vs-aPTT value regression analysis was 60.7 to 102.4 seconds. The aPTT therapeutic range corresponded by anti-Xa activity-vs-aPTT value regression analysis was 85.3 to 147.5 seconds. The validation of heparin sensitivity using in-vitro heparin sample was not considered. The establishing aPTT therapeutic range is recommended anti-Xa activity using in-vivo sample.

Keywords