대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제38권4호
  • /
  • Pages.376-382
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소아청소년기에 치수치료를 받은 제1대구치의 술전 상태 조사

A SURVEY ON THE PREOPERATIVE CONDITIONS OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED FIRST MOLARS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

  • 이순영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이경호 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 노홍석 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 정태성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김신 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Lee, Soon-Young (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Ho (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Noh, Hong-Seok (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Tae-Sung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.06.15
  • 심사 : 2011.11.05
  • 발행 : 2011.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

제1대구치는 막중한 역할을 함에도 불구하고, 청소년 이전에 건강을 상실하는 경우가 드물지 않다. 본 연구는 청소년기 이전에 치수치료를 받게 된 제1대구치의 우식 및 수복 상태와 분포를 파악할 목적으로 시도되었다. 최근 5년간 부산대학교 치과병원에서 치수치료를 받은 18세 이하 106명 환자의 135개 제1대구치를 대상으로 의무기록에 대한 조사를 시행하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 평균 연령은 11.9세(남 11.5세, 여 12.5세)였고 유의한 성차를 보였으며(p<0.05), 악별로는 상악 47개, 하악 88개로 하악 치아가 더 많았다. 2. 치수 치료 전 치료 기왕력이 없는 치아는 74개, 치수 또는 수복 치료를 받은 치아는 61개였다. 그 중 재치수치료를 받게 된 경우는 22개로 치수절제술-치수절단술의 순이었으며, 단순 수복치료를 받았던 치아는 39개로 복합레진-아말감-GI-인레이-수복물 탈락 후 미치료-열구전색 및 주조 전장관의 순이었다. 3. 병소 위치가 분류 가능한 73개의 병소 중에서는 근심면 병소가 22개, 교합면 혹은 협설면 병소 39개, 원심면 병소가 12개를 차지하였다.

In clinical dentistry, it is not difficult to meet the permanent first molars with severe coronal caries lesions in children or adolescents. The circumstances surrounding the first molars of children and adolescents are so immature and imperfect compared with those of adults. So we thought it significant to understand the status of these teeth at the moment of endodontic treatment and immediate cause of it. 106 patients with 135 permanent molars necessitating endodontic treatment in childhood and adolescence were included in this study, and the dental records and radiographs were examined. 1. The mean age was 11.9 year (male 11.5, female 12.5) and the result shows significant difference between gender(p<0.05). The mandibular teeth took more than half percentage than maxillary teeth. 2. Of 135 teeth, 45.2 percent of teeth had history of dental treatment previously and 16.3 percent of teeth showed necessity of re-endodontic treatment. 3. Of 73 teeth, 22 teeth had mesial-wall cavity causing endodontic treatment, 39 had occlusal cavity, and 12 had distal cavity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Christopher D, Marie TH, Paula W : Paediatric Cariology. Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd., London, 1-8.
  2. 대한소아치과학회 : 소아청소년치과학. 신흥인터내셔날, 서울, 70-71, 141-153, 2007.
  3. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee-Pulp Therapy subcommitte; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs : Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent, 30(Suppl):170-174, 2008-2009.
  4. Locker D, Jokovic A, Kay EJ : Prevention. Part 8: The use of pit and fissure sealants in preventing caries in the permanent dentition of children. Br Dent J, 195:375-378, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810556
  5. Azarphzhooh A, Main PA : Pit and fissure sealants in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents : a systematic review. J Can Dent Assoc, 74:171-177, 2008.
  6. Carvalho JC, Figueredo CS, Mestrinho HD : Clinical report on plaque formation, distribution and maturation within the primary, mixed and permanent dentitions. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 10:193-199, 2009.
  7. 대한치과보존학회 : 치과보존학. 대한나래출판사, 서울, 281-283, 2003.
  8. Roberts HW, Charlton DG : The release of mercury from amalgam restorations and its health effects: a reviews. Oper Dent, 34:605-614, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-072-LIT
  9. Wilson EG, Mandradjieff M, Brindock T : Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations. Dent Clin North Am, 34:27-44, 1990.
  10. Mjor IA, Kenneth JA : Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Criteria for placement and replacement. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Illinois, p.61-68, 1989.
  11. 김인영, 김재문, 정태성 등 : 어린이 제1대구치 복합 레진 수복물의 5년 후 임상평가. 대한소아치과학회지, 35:110-115, 2008.
  12. Roumanas ED : The frequency of replacement of dental restorations may vary based on a number of variables, including type of material, size of the restoration, and caries risk of the patient. J Evid Base Dent Pract, 10:23-24, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.009
  13. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL : A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 26:311-317, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00019-5
  14. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, et al. : Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent, 29:481-508, 2004.
  15. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegard U, et al. : Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent, 37:673-678, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010
  16. Peres KG, Peres MA, Araujo CL, et al. : Social and dental status along the life course and oral health impacts in adolescents : a population-based birth cohort. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 7:95-104, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-95
  17. Fong CD, Davis MJ : Partial pulpotomy for immature permanent teeth, its present and future. Pediatr Dent, 24:29-32, 2002.
  18. Souza RA, Gomes SC, Dantas Jda C, et al. : Importance of the diagnosis in the pulpotomy of immature permanent teeth. Braz Dent, 18:244-247, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000300013
  19. Ranly DM, Garcia-Godoy F : Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent, 28:153-161, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00065-2
  20. Donly KJ, Garcia-Godoy F : The use of resin-based composite in children. Pediatr Dent, 24:480-488, 2002.
  21. Dennison JB, Straffon LH, More FG : Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc, 121:610-614, 1990. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0216
  22. Hintze H : Approximal caries prevalence in Danish recruits and progression of caries in the late teens: a retrospective radiographic study. Caries Res, 35:27-35, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047427
  23. Mejare I, Kallestal C, Stenlund H, et al. : Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiography study. Caries Res, 32:10-16, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016424
  24. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V : Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive lesions. Caries Res, 33:252-260, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016526
  25. Takahashi N, Nyvad B : Caries ecology revisited: microbial dynamics and the caries process. Caries Res, 42:409-418, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1159/000159604
  26. Pinkham JR : Pediatric dentistry: Infancy through adolescence. Elsevier saunders, Iowa, 201-204. 2005.
  27. Leroy R, Bogaerts K, Lesaffre E, et al. : Effect of caries experience in primary molars on cavity formation in the adjacent permanent first molar. Caries Res, 39:342-349, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1159/000086839
  28. 안명기, 이금랑, 정태성 등 : 어린이 제1대구치 근심면 초기 우식의 유병률과 최소 침습적 접근. 대한소아치과학회지, 36:102-107, 2009.
  29. Alm A, Wendt LK, Koch, et al. : Prevalence of approximal caries in posterior teeth in 15-year-old Swedish teenagers in relation to their caries experience at 3 years of age. Caries Res, 41:392-398, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1159/000104798
  30. Christensen GJ : Initial carious lesions: when should they be restored? J Am Dent Assoc, 131:1760-1762, 2000. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0123
  31. Stahl J, Zandona AF : Rationale and protocol for the treatment of non-cavitated smooth surface carious lesions. Gen Dent, 55:105-111, 2007.
  32. Roberts MW : Dental health of children: where we are today and remaining challenges. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32:231-234, 2008.
  33. Featherstone JD : Remineralization, the natural caries repair process-the need for new approaches. Adv Dent Res, 21:4-7, 2009.
  34. 이금랑, 안명기, 정태성 등 : 인접면 초기 우식 병소의 깊이에 따른 therapeutic sealing의 유효성 평가. 대한소아치과학회지, 36:394-402, 2009.
  35. Gomez SS, Onetto JE, Uribe SA, et al. : Therapeutic seal of approximal incipient noncavitated carious lesions: technique and case reports. Quintessence Int, 38:e99-105, 2007.
  36. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Mueller J, et al. : Progression of sealed initial bovine enamel lesions under demineralizing conditions in vitro. Caries Res, 40:124-129, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091058
  37. Mueller J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, et al. : Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: influence of the application procedure. Oper Dent, 31:338-345, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-39
  38. Stephens RG, Kogon SL, Reid JA : Non-invasive therapy for proximal enamel caries: An expanded role for bitewing radiography. J Can Dent Assoc, 8:619-622, 1987.
  39. Lunder N, von der Fehr FR : Approximal cavitation related to bite-wing image and caries activity in adolescents. Caries Res, 30:143-147, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1159/000262151
  40. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ : Systematic review of selected dental caries diagnostic and management methods. J Dent Educ, 65:960-968, 2001.
  41. Pitts NB, Stamm JW : International consensus workshop on caries clinical trials (ICW-CCT)-final consensus statements: agreeing where the evidence leads. J Dent Res, 83:C125-128, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301S27
  42. Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DJ, et al. : Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. Oper Dent, 32:225-235, 2007 https://doi.org/10.2341/06-63