Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology (수산해양기술연구)

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology (한국수산해양기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination factors for catch rate of the target species between circle hook and straight shank hook in the Korean tuna longline fishery

우리나라 다랑어연승어업에 있어서 환형낚시와 재래식낚시를 사용하여 목표종의 어획률을 결정하는 요인 분석

  • An, Doo-Hae (National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Kwon, You-Jung (Department of Fisheries Physics, Graduate School, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Bigelow, Keith (Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center) ;
  • Moon, Dae-Yeon (National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Il (National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI))
  • Received : 2011.04.14
  • Accepted : 2011.09.14
  • Published : 2011.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We conducted experiments to compare the catch rate of bigeye tuna and yellowfin tuna between circle hooks and straight shank hook in the Korean tuna longline fishery at the eastern and central Pacific Ocean from 2005 to 2007. We analyzed difference of fork length, survival and hooking location between a circle hook and a straight shank hook for both tunas, respectively. There was no difference in the mean fork length size of yellowfin tuna caught on the two type of hook but bigeye tuna was significant. In case of survival, there was no difference between two hook type, but the difference of hooking location was significant for both species. We also analyzed to find determinants of both tunas catch rate using generalized linear models (GLMs) which were used latitude, longitude, year, month, depth, hook type, bait type and so on as independent variables. Spatial factors, latitude and longitude, and temporal factors, year and month, affected catch rate of bigeye tuna and yellowfin tuna. And also, depth such as a marine environment factor was influenced on catch rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Akaike, H., 1985. Prediction and entropy. In: A Celebration of Statistics. Atkinson, A.C. and S.E. Feinberg, des. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1－24.
  2. Baum, J.K., R.A. Myers, D.G. Kehler, B. Worm, S.J. Harley and P.A. Doherty. 2003. Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic. Science (Wash., D.C.), 299, 389－392. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079777
  3. Boggs, C.H. and Y. Swimmer. 2007. Developments (2006－2007) in scientific research on the use of modified fishing gear to reduce longline bycatch of sea turtles. WCPFC-SC3-EB SWG/WP－7, pp. 10.
  4. Cooke, S.J. and C.D. Suski. 2004. Are circle hooks an effective tool for conserving marine and freshwater recreational catch-and-release fisheries?. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 14, 299－326. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.614
  5. Cox, A. 2009. Quota allocation in international fisheries. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing, pp. 60.
  6. Dalzell, P. and E. Gilman. 2006. Turtle bycatch mitigation in the Hawaiian longline fishery. WCPFC-SC2-2006/EB WP－13, pp. 8.
  7. Falterman, B. and J.E. Graves. 2002. A preliminary comparison of the relative mortality and hooking efficiency of circle and straight shank ( "J") hooks used in the pelagic longline industry. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 30, 80－87.
  8. FAO, 2004. Report of the Expert Consultation on Interactions between Sea Turtles and Fisheries within an Ecosystem Context. FAO Fisheries Report No. 738, Rome, FAO, pp. 38.
  9. FAO, 2005. Report of the Technical Consultation on Sea Turtles Conservation and Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Report No. 765, Rome, FAO, pp. 31.
  10. Gilmand, E. and D. Kobayashi. 2007. Sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery: First quarter 2007 and comparison to previous periods. Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council. Available from http://www. wpcouncil.org/hot/. Accessed 19 February 2008. pp. 10.
  11. Gilman, E., D. Kobayashi, T. Swenarton, N. Brothers, P. Dalzell and I. Kinan-Kelly. 2007. Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery. Biol. Conserv., 139, 19－28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.002
  12. Guisan, A., Jr. T.C. Edwards and T. Hastie. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol. modell., 157, 89－100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1
  13. Hoey, J.J. 1996. Bycatch in Western Atlantic pelagic longline fisheries. In: Solving Bycatch: Considerations for Today And Tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Rep., No. 96－03, 193－203.
  14. Hoey, J.J. and N. Moore. 1999. Multi-species catch characteristics for the US Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. Captain′s Report. National Marine Fisheries-NOAA-NMFS. Marfin Grant-NA77FF- 0543, (SK) Grant-NA86FD0113, 1－78.
  15. Kerstetter, D.W. and J.E. Graves. 2006. Effects of circle versus J-style hooks on target ad non-target species in a pelagic longline fishery. Fish. Res., 80, 239－ 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.032
  16. Kim, S.S., D.Y. Moon, D.H. An, S.J. Hwang, Y.S. Kim, K. Bigelow and D. Curran. 2008. Effects of hook bait types on bigeye tuna catch rates in the tuna longline fishery. Kor. J. Ichthy., 20 (2), 105－111.
  17. Minami, H., K. Yokota and M. Kiyota. 2006. Effect of circle hooks and feasibility of de-hooking devices to reduce incidental mortality of sea turtles in the Japanese longline fishery. WCPFC/SC/EBWG06/ WP－9, pp. 9.
  18. Ward, P. and R.A. Myers. 2005. Shifts in open-ocean fish communities coinciding with the commencement of commercial fishing. Ecology, 86 (4), 835－847. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0746
  19. Ward, P. and S. Hindmarsh. 2007. An overview of historical changes in the fishing gear and practices of pelagic longliners, with particular reference to Japan′s Pacific fleet. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 17, 501 －516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-007-9051-0
  20. Ward, P., S. Epe, D. Kreutz, E. Lawrence, C. Robins and A. Sands. 2009. The effects of circle hooks on bycatch and target catches in Australia′s pelagic longline fishery. Fish. Res., 97, 253－262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.02.009
  21. Watson, J.W. and D.W. Kerstetter. 2006. Pelagic longline fishing gear: a brief history and review of research efforts to improve selectivity. Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 40, 6－11.
  22. Watson, JW, D.G. Foste, S. Epperly and A. Shah. 2003. Experiments in the Atlantic northeast distant waters to evaluate sea turtle mitigation measures in the pelagic longline fishery. Report on experiments conducted in 2001 and 2002. NOAA Fisheries, March 5, 2003. pp. 89.
  23. Watson, J.W., S.P. Epperly, E.A. Shah and D.G. Foster. 2005. Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 62, 965－981. https://doi.org/10.1139/f05-004
  24. Yokota, K., M. Kiyota and H. Minami. 2006. Shark catch in a pelagic longline fishery: Comparison of circle and tuna hooks. Fish. Res., 81, 337－341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2006.08.006

Cited by

  1. Catch characteristics of the Korean tuna longline fishery in the Atlantic ocean vol.50, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2014.50.4.556