Stress analysis of non carious cervical lesion and cervical composite resin restoration

지상강좌 1 - 비우식성 치경부병소와 치경부 복합레진수복의 응력분석

  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2010.04.05
  • Accepted : 2010.04.21
  • Published : 2010.04.01

Abstract

Noncarious cervical lesions(NCCLs) are characterized as structural defects found on the tooth surface of the cement-enamel junction. Loss of tooth structure through noncarious mechanisms may vary in etiology and clinical presentation for each individual but presently many clinician now classify this as tooth failure of abfraction due to the stress applied in the cervical area of the tooth under oral physiological and pathological loads. In the current study, we investigated the stress distribution of maxillary premolar with NCCL using simulated 3D finite element analysis. The results were as follows: 1. In the sound maxillary premolar, the stresses were highly concentrated at cervical enamel surface of the mesiobuccal line angle, asymmetrically. 2. Once the lesion has been formed, the highest stress concentration was observed around the apex of the wedge shaped lesion. 3. In four types of NCCL, the patterns of stress distribution were similar and the peak stress was observed at mesial corner and also stresses concentrated at lesion apex. 4. Lesion cavity modification of rounding apex, reduced stress of lesion apex. 5. When restoring the notch-shaped lesion, material with high elastic modulus worked well at the lesion apex and material with low elastic modulus worked well at the cervical cavosurface margin.

Keywords

References

  1. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;Aug ;22(4):195-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90107-4
  2. Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compendium 1994;Nov;15(11):1396,1398-1400.
  3. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. . J Prosthet Dent 1984;Sep;52(3):374-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90448-7
  4. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991;Jan- Feb;3(1):14-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x
  5. Giannini M, Soares CJ, de Carvalho RM. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater 2004;May;20(4):322-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00110-6
  6. 대한치과보존학회편저 치과보존학-차아보존수복학. 제3개정판. 신흥인터내셔날 2010.
  7. 전상제, 박정길, 김현철, 우성관, 김광훈, 손권, 허복. Effects of occlusal load on the stress distribution of four cavity configurations of noncarious cervical lesions: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. 대한치과보존학회지 2006;31(5):359-70.
  8. 이형모, 허복, 김현철, 우성관, 김광훈, 손권, 박정길. Effects of occlusal load on the cervical stress distribution: a three-dimensional finite element study. 2006;31(6):427-36.
  9. 박정길, 허복, 김성교 Stress distribution of class V composite resin restorations:A three-dimensional finite element study. 대한치과보존학회지;33(1):28-38.
  10. 박정길, 허복, 김성교 The influence of combining composite resins with different elastic modulus on the stress distribution of class V restoration:A three-dimensional finite element study. 대한치과보존학회지;33(3):184-97
  11. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;Apr;111(2):149-54. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00018.x
  12. Tanaka M, Naito T, Yokota M, Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force. J Oral Rehabil 2003;Jan;30(1):60-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00959.x
  13. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth--a finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1991;Oct;66(4):451-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90504-P
  14. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Gregory PN, Owens BM. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Am J Dent 1999;12:119-122.
  15. McCoy G. The etiology of gingival erosion. J Oral Implantol. 1982;10(3):361-2.