Epistatic Relationships among Genes Related to Endosperm Starch Synthesis in Rice

  • Lee, Joohyun (Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koh, Hee-jong (Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2010.06.14
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

The mutants of sugary-2 (su-2), floury (flo), shrunken-1 (shr-1), and dull-1 (du-1) were crossed to waxy (wx) to produce $F_2$ seeds. Chi-square analysis on the segregating ratio of the $F_2$ seeds revealed that flo, su-2, and shr-1 were independently transmitted with wx, while wx was epistatic over du-1. The floury and sugary-2 were crossed to Hwasunchalbyeo, a waxy variety, and then the $F_4$ of floury-waxy and sugary-2-waxy seeds were developed, respectively. As the parents phenotypes of sugary-2 and floury, the grains of these two lines showed lower hardness and grain weight than normal grain of Hwacheongbyeo. For alkali digestive value (AVD), the sugary-2-waxy showed lower ADV than Hwacheongbyeo. For the gel consistency of grain flours, the floury was medium like Hwacheongbyeo, while those of the sugary-2, floury-waxy, and sugary-2-waxy were soft like Hwasunchalbyeo. The amylose contents in the grains of the sugary-2 and floury were decreased to ~15% whereas that of Hwacheongbyeo was 19.1%. All the lines showing waxy endosperm (Hwasunchalbyeo, floury-waxy, and sugary-2-waxy) showed less than 4% amylose contents. Interestingly, the free sugar content in the brown rice was increased to 9.27% in the sugary-2-waxy, showing transgressive segregation phenomenon where the free sugar contents in its parents, sugary-2 and Hwasunchalbyeo, were 5.98% and 3.98% respectively. Also, the floury-waxy showed transgressive segregation phenomenon, containing 6.15% of free sugar content in the grains.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

References

  1. Andrew RH, Brink RA, Neal NP. 1944. Some effects of waxy and sugary genes on endosperm development in maize. J Agr Res 69: 355-371.
  2. Cagampang GB, Perez CM, Juliano BO. 1973. A gel consistency test for eating quality of rice. J Sci Food Agric 24: 1589-1594. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740241214
  3. Chang WL, Li WY. 1981. Inheritance of amylose content and gel consistency in rice. Bot Bull Acad Sinica 22: 35-47.
  4. Faruq G, Mohamad O, Hadjim K, Meisner CA. 2004. Inheritance of gelatinization temperature in rice. Int J Agri Biol 6: 810-812.
  5. Ha KY, Park HK, Ko JK, Kim CK, Cho YH, KIM GY, KIM YD 2006. Effect of storage period and temperature on the characteristics related with rice quality. Korean J. Crop Sci. 51(s): 25-29.
  6. Hao W, Zhu MZ, Gao JP, Sun SY, Lin HX. 2009. Identification of quantitative trait loci for rice quality in a population of chromosome segment substitution lines. J Integr Plant Biol 51: 500-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2009.00822.x
  7. He P, Li SG, Qian Q, Ma YQ, Li JZ, Wang WM, Chen Y, Zhu LH. 1999. Genetic analysis of rice grain quality. Theor Appl Genet 98: 502-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051098
  8. Heu MH, Park SJ. 1979. Inheritance of alkali digestion value. Genetic analysis and measurement of alkali digestion values in the $F_1$ hybrids from high and low ADV rice grains. Korean J Breed 11: 196-200.
  9. Heu MH, Seo HS. 1975. A basic research on the developing high protein rice lines. Variation in protein and amylose contents in rice grains by different cultivating seasons and years. Korean J Crop Sci 20, 142-147.
  10. Juliano BO. 1971. A simplified assay for milled rice amylose. Cereal Sci Today 16: 334-338.
  11. Isshiki M, Nakajima M, Satoh H, Shimamoto K. 2000. dull: rice mutants with tissue-specific effects on the splicing of the waxy pre-mRNA. Plant J 23: 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00803.x
  12. Juliano BO. 1992. Structure, chemistry, and function of the rice grain and its fractions. Cereal Foods World 37: 772-779.
  13. Kim GH, Heu MH, Lee JH, Koh HJ. 1991. Developing new rice grain mutants. Korean J Crop Sci 31: 197-203.
  14. Lestari P, Ham TH, Lee HH, Woo MO, Jiang W, Chu SH, Kwon SW, Ma K, Lee JH, Cho YC, Koh HJ. 2009. PCR marker-based evaluation of the eating quality of japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Agric Food Chem 57: 2754-2762. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf803804k
  15. Little RR, Hilder GB, Dawson EH. 1958. Differential effect of dilute alkali on 25 varieties of milled white rice. Cereal Chem 35: 111-126.
  16. Omura T, Satoh H. 1984. Mutation of grain properties in rice. p. 293-303. In S. Tsunoda and N. Takahashi (ed.). Biology of Rice. Japan. Science Society Press. Tokyo, Japan.
  17. Panlasigui LN, Thompson LU, Juliano BO, Perez CM, Yiu SH, Greenberg GR. 1991. Rice varieties with similar amylose content differ in starch digestibility and glycemic response in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 54: 871-877.
  18. Tan YF, Li JX, Yu SB, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Zang Q. 1999. The three important traits for cooking and eating quality of rice grains are controlled by a single locus in an elite rice hybrid, Shanyou 63. Theor Appl Genet 99: 642-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051279
  19. Wang, LQ, Liu WJ, Xu Y, He YQ, Luo LJ, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Zhang Q. 2007. Genetic basis of 17 traits and viscosity parameters characterizing the eating and cooking quality of rice grain. Theor Appl Genet 115: 463-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-007-0580-7