Korean Journal of Breeding Science (한국육종학회지)

The Korean Society of Breeding Science (한국육종학회)
권호 표지

Progeny Analysis of Hybrid Lilies Crossed Between Several Genotypes and Tetraploid Oriental-Asiatic Hybrids

체세포 염색체가 배가된 4배체 Oriental-Asiatic(OA) hybrid 유래 종간잡종 백합의 후대검정

  • Chung, Mi-Young (Department of Horticulture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Chung, Jae-Dong (Department of Horticulture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Van Tuyl, Jaap M. (BU Genetics and Breeding, Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Centre) ;
  • Lim, Ki-Byung (Department of Horticulture, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2010.03.16
  • Published : 20100300
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to confirm the chromosome constitution and homoeologous recombination of progenies derived from various cross combination using tetraploid OA interspecific hybrid originated from mitotic chromosome doubling. Based on the chromosome analysis of progenies crossed reciprocally, there were only triploid progenies when crossed with diploid Asiatics as male or female parent. While only tetraploid progenies were produced when crossed tetraploid Asiatics or tetraploid OA hybrid with tetraploid OA hybrid, respectively. However, two types of progenies, that is, diploid and triploid plants, were produced from cross combinations between diploid Oriental hybrid and tetraploid OA hybrid. From the GISH analysis of OA hybrid, it was confirmed that diploid $F_1$ OA hybrid was consisted of 24 chromosomes (12 Oriental and 12 Asiatics) showing authentic OA hybrid. On the other hand, it was notified that triploid plants (3x=36) were consisted of 24 Asiatics lily chromosomes and 12 Oriental lily chromosomes by analysis of backcross progenies derived from either $A{\times}OA$ or $OA{\times}A$ crosses. In cross between tetraploid OA and OA, all the progenies were tetraploid with equal number of chromosomes without any homoeologous recombination, i.e. each 24 chromosomes of Oriental and Asiatics. In 2x-4x ($O{\times}OA$) cross combination, some progenies had 2x=24 chromosomes originated from only Oriental hybrid, and other progenies had 3x=36 chromosomes derived from 24 chromosomes of Oriental hybrid and 12 chromosomes of Asiatic hybrid. Only tetraploid Asiatics chromosomes without any Oriental one were produced in all the progenies from 4x-4x ($AA{\times}OA$) cross combination.

본 연구는 체세포 배수화를 통해 생산한 4배체 OA hybrid 와 다양한 교배조합간 후대를 대상으로 염색체 구성 및 조환여부를 알아보기 위하여 수행되었다. 4배체 OA hybrid의 여교잡 후대를 분석한 결과, 2배체 아시아틱 품종을 부 또는 모본으로 정역교배한 조합에서는 3배체가, 4배체 아시아틱과 4배체 OA 품종을 부 또는 모본으로 한 교배조합에서는 4배체가 생산되었다. 그러나, 2배체 Oriental 품종을 모본으로 교배한 경우, 3배체 또는 2배체를 얻을 수 있었다. OA hybrid를 대상으로 GISH방법으로 이종염색체의 조환여부를 확인한 결과, OA hybrid의 염색체수는 24개, 그 중 12개는 모본인 Oriental hybrid, 12개는 부본인 Asiatic hybrid에서 유래한 것을 알 수 있었다. 체세포 염색체간 배수화된 OA hybrid의 여교잡 후대의 경우, $A{\times}OA$, $OA{\times}A$ 교배에서는 Oriental hybrid 염색체가 12개, Asiatic hybrid 24개, $OA{\times}OA$간 교배에서는 Oriental hybrid 염색체 24개와 Asiatic hybrid 24개로 진정한 4배체 잡종임을 확인 할 수 있었으며, 이들 후대는 어떠한 조합에서도 부분적인 이종염색체간 조환이 일어나지 않았다. 한편 $O{\times}OA$ 교배의 후대식물의 염색체 구성은 Oriental hybrid 유래 염색체만 2x=24개인 경우와 3배체(Oriental = 24, Asiatic = 12)로 판명되었다. 4배체 아시아틱계 품종을 모본으로 한 $AA{\times}OA$ 교배조합의 경우, Asiatic hybrid염색체만 48개로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 농촌진흥청

References

  1. Anderson JA, Mousset-Declas G. Williams EG, Taylor NL 1991. An in vitro chromosome doubling method for clovers (Trifolium ssp.). Genome 34:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1139/g91-001
  2. Asano Y. 1982. Chromosome association and pollen fertility in some interspecific hybrids of Lilium. Euphytica 31:121-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028314
  3. Beattie DJ, While JW. 1993. Lilium-hybrids and species. In: De Hertogh AA, Le Nard M. (eds) The physiology of flower bulbs. Elsevier Sci. Publ. BV., Amsterdam. p. 423-454.
  4. Bennett ST, Kenton AY, Bennett MD. 1993. Genomic in situ hybridization reveals the allopolyploid nature of Millium montianum (Gramimeae). Chromosoma 101:420-424.
  5. Gingham ET. 1968. Stomatal chloroplast in alfalfa at four ploidy levels. Crop Sci. 8:509-510. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800040036x
  6. Boase MR, Hopping ME. 1995. DNA dodecaploid plants detected among somaclones of Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa cv. Hayward. Plant Cell Rep. 14:319-323.
  7. Borrino EM, Powell W. 1988. Stomatal guard cell length as an indicator of ploidy in microspore-derived plants of barley. Genome 30:158-160. https://doi.org/10.1139/g88-027
  8. Chalak L, Legave JM. 1996. Oryzalin combined with adventitious regeneration for an efficient chromosome doubling of trihaploid kiwifruit. Plant Cell Reports 16:67-100.
  9. Chaudhari HK, Barrow JR. 1975. Identification of cotton haploids by stomatal chloroplast-count technique. Crop Sci. 15:760-762. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500060006x
  10. Chen Q, Armstrong KC. 1994. Genomic in situ hybridization in Avena sativa. Genome 37:607-612. https://doi.org/10.1139/g94-086
  11. Chung MY, Chung JD, Van Tuyl JM, Lim KB. 2004. In vitro mitotic chromosome doubling by chemical treatment in Lillium longiflorum. Korean J. Plant Biotechnlogy 31(1):73-78.
  12. De Wet JMJ. 1980. Origins of polyploidy. In: W.H. Lewis (ed) Polyploidy-biological relevance. Plenum press. New York. p. 3-16.
  13. Dean C, Schmidt R. 1995. Plant genomes: A current molecular description. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. and Plant Mol. Biol. 46:395-418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.46.060195.002143
  14. Den Nijs TPM. 1977. 2n gamates in potato species: occurrence, genetic basis and function in sexual polyploidization. Ph.D. thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Madison. WI.
  15. Dolezel J, Binarova P. 1989. The effects of colchicine on ploidy level, morphology and embryogenic capacity of alfalfa suspension cultures. Plant Sci. 64:213-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(89)90026-5
  16. Garriga-Caldere F, Huigen DJ, Filotico F, Jacobsen E, Ramanna MS. 1997. Identification of alien chromosomes through GISH and RFLP analysis and the potential for the establishment of potato lines with monosomic additions of tomato chromosomes. Genome 40:666-673. https://doi.org/10.1139/g97-088
  17. Gatt M, Hammett KRW, Murray BG. 2000. Interspecific hybridization and the analysis of meiotic chromosome pairing in Dahlia (Asteraceae-Heliantheae) species with x=16. Plant Systematics Evolution 221:25-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086378
  18. Harlan JR, De Wet JMJ.1975. On O. Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy. Bot. Rev. 41:361-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860830
  19. Hassawi DS, Gerogc HL. 1991. Antimitotic Agents: Effects on double haploid production in wheat. Crop Sci. 31:723-726. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100030037x
  20. Heslop-Harrison JS. Leithch AR, Schwarzacher T, Anamthawat-Jonsson K. 1990. Detection and characterization of 1B/1R translocations in hexaploid wheat. Heredity 65:385-392. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1990.108
  21. Hopping ME. 1994. Flow cytometric analysis in Actinidia specics. New Zealand J. Bot. 32:85-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1994.10410410
  22. Iwanaga M, Peloquin SJ. 1982. Origin and evolution of cultivated tetraploid potatoes via 2n gametes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 61:161-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273885
  23. Jaeobsen E, de Jong JH, Kamstra SA, van den Berg PMMM, Ramanna MS. 1995. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and RFLP analysis for the identification of alien chromosome in the backcross progeny of potato(+) tomato fusion hybrids. Heredity 74:250-257. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.38
  24. Jiang J, Gill BS. 1994. Nonisotopic in situ hybridization and plant genome mapping: the first 10 years. Genome 37:717-725. https://doi.org/10.1139/g94-102
  25. Kamo K, Grieshbach RJ. 1989. Determination of ploidy level on 'Mitchell' Petunias. Plant Sci. 65: 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(89)90214-8
  26. Karlov GI, Khrustaleva LI, Lim KB, van Tuyl JM. 1999. Homoeologous recombination in 2n-gametes producing interspecific hybrids of Lilium (Liliaceae) studied by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Genome 42:681-686.
  27. Keller ERJ, Schubert, Fuchs J, Meister A. 1996. Interspecific crosses of onion with distant Allium species and characterization of the presumed hybrids by means of flow cytometry, karyotype analysis and genomic in situ hybridization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:417-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223688
  28. Kenton A, Parokonny AS, Gleba YY, Bennett MD. 1993. Characterization of the Nicotiana tabacum L. genome by molecular cytogenetics. Mol. Gen. Genet. 240:159-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277053
  29. Khrustaleva LI, Kik C. 1998. Cytogenetical studies in the bridge cross A. cepa ${\times}$ (A. fistulosum ${\times}$ A. roylei). Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050702
  30. Khrustaleva LI, Kik C. 2000. Introgression of A. fistulosum into A. cepa mediated by A. roylei. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:17-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050003
  31. King IP, Purdie KA, Orford SE, Reader SM, Miller TE. 1993. Detection of homoeologous chiasma formation in Triticum durm ${\times}$ Thinopyrum bessarabicum hybrids using genomic in situ hybridization. Heredity 71:369-372. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1993.151
  32. Ko JM, An SI, Suh DY, Kweon YC, Kwak YH, Seo BB. 1997. Geonomic in Situ hybridization in intergeneric hybrids between wheat and some wheat grasses. Korean J. Breed. 29(4):486-491.
  33. Le HT. Armstrong KC. 1991. In situ hybridization as a rapid means to assess meiotic pairing and detection of alien DNA transfers in interphase cells of wide crosses involving wheat and rye. Mol. Gen. Genet. 225:33-37.
  34. Leitch AR, Mosgoller W, Schwarlacher T, Bennett MD, Heslop-Harrison JS. 1990. Genomic in situ hybirdization to sectioned nuclei shows chromosome domains in grass hybrids. J. Cell. Sci. 95:335-341.
  35. Lim KB, Chung JD, Van Kronenburg BCE, Ramanna MS, De Jong JH, Van Tuyl JM. 2000. Introgression of Lilium rubellum Baker chromosomes into L. longiflourm Thunb.: a genome painting study of the $F_1$ hybrid, $BC_1$ and $BC_2$ progenies. Choromosome Research 8:119-125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009290418889
  36. Lim KB, Ramanna MS, de Jong JH, Jacobsen E, Van Tuyl JM. 2001. Indeterminate meiotic restitution (IMR): a novel type of meiotic nuclear restitution mechanism detected in interspecific lily hybrids by GISH. Thero. Appl. Genel. 103:219-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220100638
  37. Lu C, Bridgen MP. 1997. Chromosome doubling and fertility of Alstroemeria aurea${\times}$A. caryophyllaea. Euphytica 94:75-81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002911522748
  38. McRae EA. 1998. Lilies: A guide for growers and collectors. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. p. 105-258.
  39. Mesbah M, de Bock TSM, Sandbrink JM, Klein-Lankhorst RM,Langc W. 1997. Molecular and morphological characterization of monosomic additions in Beta vulgaris, carrying extra chromosomes of B. procumbens or B. patellaris. Mol. Breed. 3:147-157. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009693619852
  40. Mesbah M, Wennekes-van Eden J, de Jong JH, de Back TSM, Lange W. 2000. FISH to mitotic chromosomes and extended DNA fibres of Beta procumbens in a series of monosomic additions to beet (Beta vulgaris). Chromosome Res. 8:285-293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009271109828
  41. Mukai Y, Friebe B, Hatchen JH, Yamamoto M, Gill DS. 1993. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of radiation-induced wheat-rye terminal and intercalary chromosomal translocations and the detection of rye chromatin specifying resistance to Hessian fly. Chromosoma 102:88-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356025
  42. Prywara L, Pandey KK, SlInders PM. 1988. Length of stomata as an indicator of ploidy level in Actinidia deliciosa. New Zealand J. Bot. 26: 179-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1988.10410110
  43. Ran Y, Hammett KRW, Murry BG. 2001. Hybrid Identification in Clivia (Amaryllidaceae) using chromosome banding and Genomic in situ hybridization. Annals of Botany 87:457-462. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1365
  44. Schubert I, Shi F, Fuchs J, Endo TR. 1998. An efficient screening for terminal deletions and translocations of barley chromosomes added to common wheat. Plant J. 14:489-495. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00125.x
  45. Schwarzacher T, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Harrison GE, Islam AKMR, Jiak JZ, Leitch AR, Miller TE, Reader SM, Rogers WJ, Shi M, Heslop-Harrison JS. 1992. Genomic in situ hybridization to identify alien chromosomes and chromosome segments in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:778-786.
  46. Tun GY, Dunn GM. 1973. Relationship of stomatal length and frequency and pollen grain diameter to ploidy level in Bromus inermis Leyss. Crop Sci. 13:332-334. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300030014x
  47. Tosca A, Pandolfi R, Citterio S, Fasoil A, Sgorbati S. 1995. Determination by now cytometry of the chromosome doubling capacity of colchicine and oryzalin in gynogenetic haploid of Gerbera. Plant Cell Report 14:455-458.
  48. Van Tuyl JM. 1997. Interspecific hybridization of flower bulbs: a review. Acta Hort. 430:465-476.
  49. Van Tuyl JM, Boon E. 1997. Variation in DNA-content in the genus Lilium. Acta Hort. 430:829-835.
  50. Yamashita KI, Iino M, Shigyo M, Tashiro, Y 2000. Visulization of Nucleus substitution between Allium galanthum and Shallot (A. cepa) by Genomic in situ hybridization. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 69(2):189-191. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.69.189
  51. Yan G, Ferguson AR, McNilage MA, Murray BG. 1997. Numerically unreduced (2n) gametes and sexual ployploidization in Actinidia. Euphytica 96:267-272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003037920247
  52. Yao JL, Cohen D, Rowland RE. 1995. Interspecific albino and variegated hybrids in the genus Zantedeschia. Plant Science 109(2):99-206.