The Radiologic Features of Cystic versus Noncystic Glioblastoma Multiforme as Significant Prognostic Factors

낭성 다형교모세포종과 비낭성 다형교모세포종 환자의 수술 전 영상의학적 차이와 생존율에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Seung-Joon (Departments of Radiology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Hwang, Hee-Young (Departments of Radiology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Na-Rae (Departments of Pathology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Sheen-Woo (Departments of Radiology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Ho (Departments of Radiology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Hye-Young (Departments of Radiology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Sik (Departments of Radiology, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center)
  • 최승준 (가천의대부속 길병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 황희영 (가천의대부속 길병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김나래 (가천의대부속 길병원 병리과) ;
  • 이신우 (가천의대부속 길병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김정호 (가천의대부속 길병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 최혜영 (가천의대부속 길병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김형식 (가천의대부속 길병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2010.02.15
  • Accepted : 2010.07.22
  • Published : 2010.10.01

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative radiological characteristic and survival differences of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with and without cysts. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one GBMs were collected retrospectively; these tumors were pathologic confirmed as GBM. Based on the preoperative MR imaging, we compared the cystic GBMs with the noncystic GBMs according to the the tumor size, the tumor interface, the tumor wall thickness and peritumoral edema. Results: Seven cases were classified as cystic GBMs and fourteen were noncystic GBMs. The cystic GBMs had a well-defined tumor interface, a less than 2 cm thickness of the tumor wall and less than 40 $cm^3$ thick peritumoral edema as compared to that of the noncystic GBMs. There was a statistically significant difference in age between the patients with cystic tumors and those with noncystic tumors. For the patients with cystic GBMs and noncystic GBMs, median survival time after surgery was 43.8 months and 12.5 months, respectively. Conclusion: The cystic GBMs had a well-defined tumor interface, a thin wall and minimaledema, as compared with that of the noncystic GBMs. The patients with cystic GBMs were significantly younger and they had more favorable survival outcomes than did the patients with noncystic GBMs.

목적: 낭성 다형교모세포종과 비낭성 다형교모세포종 환자의 수술 전 영상의학적 차이와 생존율의 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 조직학적으로 진단된 21명의 다형교모세포종 환자를 대상으로 하였으며 낭성 다형교모세포종과 비낭성 다형교모세포종 환자의 수술 전 MRI에서 종괴의 크기, 종괴와 주변 뇌조직의 경계면, 종괴벽의 두께와 종괴주위 부종의 차이를 비교하였다. 결과: 7명의 낭성 다형교모세포종과 14명의 비낭성 다형교모세포종으로 분류되었으며 낭성 다형교모세포종은 비낭성 다형교모세포종보다 경계가 좋으며 85%에서 2 cm 미만의 종괴벽을 가지고 71%에서 40 $cm^3$ 종괴주위 부종을 동반하였다(p < 0.05). 또한, 낭성 다형교모세포종과 비낭성 다형교모세포종은 발병 나이와 수술 후 중앙생존기간(median survival) 간에 유의한 차이를 보였다(p < 0.05). 결론: 낭성 다형교모세포종은 비낭성 다형교모세포종보다 주변 뇌조직과의 경계가 좋고, 종괴벽의 두께가 얇으며 상대적으로 적은 종괴주위 부종을 동반하였다. 또한, 낭성 다형교모세포종은 비낭성 다형교모세포종에 비해 어린 나이에 발병하며 수술 후 중앙생존기간(median survival)도 더 긴 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chandler KL, Prados MD, Malec M, Wilson CB. Long-term sur-vival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Neurosurgery 1993;32:716-720 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199305000-00003
  2. Salford LG, Brun A, Nirfalk S. Ten-year survival among patients with supratentorial astrocytomas grade III and IV. J Neurosurg 1988;69:506-509 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.69.4.0506
  3. Shapiro WR, Green SB, Burger PC, Mahaley MS Jr, Selker RG, VanGilder JC, et al. Randomized trial of three chemotherapy regimens and two radiotherapy regimens and two radiotherapy regimens in postoperative treatment of malignant glioma. Brain tumor cooperative group trial 8001. J Neurosurg 1989;71:1-9 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.71.1.0001
  4. Hammoud MA, Sawaya R, Shi W, Thall PF, Leeds NE. Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 1996;27:65-73 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146086
  5. Gilbert H, Kagan AR, Cassidy F, Wagner J, Fuchs K, Fox D, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme is not a uniform disease! Cancer Clin Trials 1981;4:87-89
  6. Ammirati M, Vick N, Liao YL, Ciric I, Mikhael M. Effect of the extent of surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with supratentorial glioblastomas and anaplastic astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 1987;21:201-206 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198708000-00012
  7. Harsh GR 4th, Levin VA, Gutin PH, Seager M, Silver P, Wilson CB. Reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. Neurosurgery 1987;21:615-621 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198711000-00002
  8. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 2001;95:190-198 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190
  9. Maldaun MV, Suki D, Lang FF, Prabhu S, Shi W, Fuller GN, et al. Cystic glioblastoma multiforme: survival outcomes in 22 cases. J Neurosurg 2004;100:61-67 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0061
  10. Pierallini A, Bonamini M, Pantano P, Palmeggiani F, Raguso M, Osti MF, et al. Radiological assessment of necrosis in glioblastoma: variability and prognostic value. Neuroradiology 1998;40:150-153 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050556
  11. Lohle PN, Wurzer HA, Seelen PJ, Kingma LM, Go KG. The pathogenesis of cysts accompanying intra-axial primary and metastatic tumors of the central nervous system. J Neurooncol 1998;40:277- 285 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006170129761
  12. Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. Primary and secondary glioblastomas: from concept to clinical diagnosis. Neuro Oncol 1999;1:44-51 https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/1.1.44
  13. Satoshi Utsuki, Sachio Suzuki, Satoru Shimizu, Yoshinori Tanizaki, Koji Kondo, Satoshi Tanaka, et al. Pathological and clinical features of cystic and noncystic glioblastomas. Brain Tumor Pathology 2006;23:29-34 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-006-0195-8
  14. von Deimling A, Louis DN, von Ammon K, Petersen I, Hoell T, Chung RY, et al. Association of epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification with loss of chromosome 10 in human glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 1992;77:295-301 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.77.2.0295
  15. Afra D, Norman D, Levin VA. Cysts in malignant gliomas. Identification by computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1980;53: 821-825 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1980.53.6.0821
  16. Laws ER Jr, Taylor WF, Clifton MB, Okazaki H. Neurosurgical management of low-grade astrocytoma of the cerebral hemispheres. J Neurosurg 1984;61:665-673 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0665
  17. Pierallini A, Bonamini M, Bozzao A, Pantano P, Stefano DD, Ferone E, et al. Supratentorial diffuse astrocytic tumours: proposal of an MRI classification. Eur Radiol 1997;7:395-399 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050173
  18. Scott JN, Rewcastle NB, Brasher PM, Fulton D, Hagen NA, MacKinnon JA, et al. Long-term glioblastoma multiforme survivors: a population-based study. Can J Neurol Sci 1998;25:197-201 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100034016
  19. Lohle PN, Verhagen IT, Teelken AW, Blaauw EH, Go KG. The pathogenesis of cerebral gliomatous cysts. Neurosurgery 1992;30:180-185 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199202000-00005
  20. Lohle PN, van Mameren H, Zwinderman KH, Teepen HL, Go KG, Wilmink JT. On the pathogenesis of brain tumour cysts: a volumetric study of tumour, oedema and cyst. Neuroradiology 2000;42:639-642 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340000363
  21. Sawaya R, Ramo OJ, Shi ML, Mandybur G. Biological significance of tissue plasminogen activator content in brain tumors. J Neurosurg 1991;74:480-486 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.3.0480