Self-rated Health Level Comparisons by the Criteria of Precarious Employment Status: The Korean Labor and Income Survey

상이한 분류 기준에 따른 근로형태별 자가평가건강수준: 한국노동패널조사 자료를 이용한 패널회귀분석

  • Kim, Keun-Whoe (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Hun-Jong (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Soung-Hoon (Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeong-Su (Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Noh, Dae-Hee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center) ;
  • JungChoi, Kyung-Hee (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ewha Womens University School of Medicine)
  • 김근회 (건국대학교 충주병원 산업의학과) ;
  • 정헌종 (건국대학교 충주병원 산업의학과) ;
  • 장성훈 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실) ;
  • 김형수 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실) ;
  • 노대희 (경희대학교병원 산업의학과) ;
  • 정최경희 (이화여자대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2010.02.16
  • Accepted : 2010.08.19
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects of precarious employment status on the level of self-rated health, based on various criteria, by participants in the Korean Labor and Income Panel Survey. Methods: Data were obtained from 3,268 subjects(2,057 men and 1,211 women), who participated in the 2005-2006 Korean Labor and Income Panel Survey. Group A was classified as Non-precarious employment by both the Ministry of Labor (MoLab) and the Korea Labor and Society Institute (KLSI). The group B was classified as Non-precarious employment by the MoLab and as precarious employment by the KLSI. The group C is classified as Non-precarious employment by both MoLab and KLSI. Outcome variables were self-rated health and a panel logistic regression analysis was performed on the data. Results: The level of self-rated health was worse among group B males (OR: 1.45, C.I:1.00~2.11) and group C males (OR: 1.69, C.I:1.35~2.10) compared to group A males. A substantial difference(57.8%) in the level of self-rated health between groups A and B was attributed to the sociodemographic characteristics of the populations. The difference in self-rated health between groups A and C was explained by work environments(15.7%), as well as by sociodemographic characteristics(26.1%). For female workers, the level of self-rated health in group B and C was worse than in group A, but this finding was not statistically significant. Conclusions: These findings suggested that the policy to improve the working environment, as well as a more comprehensive effort to reduce the disparity, is needed for the precarious employment worker.

목적: 노동부와 한국노동사회연구소의 상이한 비정규직 분류 기준에 따라 구분되는 근로형태들의 일반적 특성, 노동환경 등을 비교하고 자가평가건강수준의 차이를 확인하고자 하였다. 방법: 2005년도와 2006년도 한국노동패널조사 자료를 이용해 2년간 연속관찰 된 총 3,268명(남성 2,057명, 여성 1,211명)을 대상으로 하였다. 노동부와 한국노동사회 연구소의 분류 기준에 따라 두 기관 모두에서 정규직으로 분류한 집단(A), 모두 비정규직으로 분류한 집단(C), 노동부는 정규직으로, 한국노동사회연구소는 비정규직으로 분류한 집단(B)으로 나누었다. 결과변수는 자가평가건강 수준으로 하였으며, 패널로지스틱 회귀분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 남성 임금노동자에서 B (OR:1.45, C.I:1.00~2.11)집단과 C (OR:1.69, C.I:1.35~2.10)집단은 A집단에 비해 자가평가건강수준이 나빴으며, 이는 통계적으로 유의하였다. A집단과 B집단의 격차는 인구사회학적 특성에 의해 상당부분 설명되었으며(57.8%), A집단과 C집단의 격차에 대해서는 인구사회학적 특성(26.1%)뿐 만 아니라 노동환경 관련 변수(15.7%)도 설명하는 데 기여하였다. 여성노동자에서는 B, C집단의 자가평가건강수준이 A집단에 비해 나쁜 경향은 있었으나 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았다. 결론: 비정규노동자의 안전보건에 대한 정책적 노력을 수립하는 데는 노동환경 개선뿐만 아니라 보다 포괄적인 불평등 개선 노력이 필요할 것으로 보인다. 비정형노동자와 함께 건강수준이 좋지 않은 B집단, 즉 비정형직을 제외한 임시 일용직 노동자에 대해서도 정책적 관심이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. The Ministry of Labor. Economically Active Population Additional Research (translated by Kim KH). Available: http://www.nso.go.kr/board_info/ BoardAction. do?method=view&board_id=47&seq=161. [cited 2 Feb 2009]. (Korean)
  2. Korea Labor & Society Institute. Precarious Employment Size and Actual Conditions (translated by Kim KH). Available: http://www.klsi.org/.[cited 2 Feb 2009]. (Korean)
  3. Kim YS. Labor Market Flexibility and Nonstandard Workforce Increase. Korea Labor & Society Institute. Seoul. 2004. pp 17-46. (Korean)
  4. Benavides FG, Benach J, Diez-Roux AV, Roman C. How do types of employment relate to health indicators? Findings from the second european survey on working conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54(7):494-501. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.494
  5. Kivimaki M, Vahtera J, Virtanen M, Elovainio M, Pentti J, Ferrie JE. Temporary employment and risk of overall and cause-specific mortality. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(7):663-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg185
  6. Kim MH, Kim CY, Park JK, Kawachi I. Is precarious employment damaging to self-rated health? Results of propensity score matching methods, using longitudinal data in South Korea. Soc Sci Med 2008;67(12):1982- 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.051
  7. Kim IH, Khang YH, Muntaner C, Chun H, Cho SI. Gender, precarious work, and chronic diseases in South Korea. Am J Ind Med 2008;51(10):748-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20626
  8. Kim IH, Muntaner C, Khang YH, Paek D, Cho SI. The relationship between nonstandard working and mental health in a representative sample of the South Korean population. Soc Sci Med 2006;63(3):566-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.02.004
  9. Kim IH, Pack DM, Cho SI. Does non-standard work affect health? J Prev Med Public Health 2005;38(3): 337-44. (Korean)
  10. Korean Labor Institute. Korean Labor and Income Panel Study User's Guide 2008. Available: http://www. kli.re.kr. [cited 2 Feb 2009]. (Korean)
  11. Kaplan GA, Camacho T. Perceived health and mortality: a nine-year follow-up of the human population laboratory cohort. Am J Epidemiol 1983;117(3):292-304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113541
  12. Wannamethee G, Shaper AG. Self-assessment of health status and mortality in middle-aged British men. Int J Epidemiol 1991;20(1):239-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/20.1.239
  13. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 1997;38(1):21-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955359
  14. Judge K. Income distribution and life expectancy: a critical appraisal. BMJ 1995;311(7015):1282-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1282
  15. StataCorp LP. Stata Longitudinal/Panel Data: Reference Manual, Release 9. StataCorp LP. Texas. 2005. pp 349.
  16. Greene W. Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. 2003. pp 245-6.
  17. Min IS, Cho PS. Panal Data Analysis. The Korean Association of STATA. Seoul. 2009. pp 65. (Korean)
  18. Kim YS. Study on the determinants of nonstandard employment: cross-section analysis of KLIPS. Economy and Society 2004;61:156-71. (Korean)
  19. Benach J, Gimeno D, Benavides FG, Martinez JM, Torne Mdel M. Types of employment and health in the European union: changes from 1995 to 2000. Eur J Public Health 2004;14(3):314-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/14.3.314
  20. Quinlan M, Mayhew C, Bohle P. The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: a review of recent research. Int J Health Serv 2001;31(2):335-414. https://doi.org/10.2190/607H-TTV0-QCN6-YLT4
  21. Kompier M, Ybema JF, Janssen J, Taris T. Employment contracts: cross-sectional and longitudinal relations with quality of working life, health and wellbeing. J Occup Health 2009;51(3):193-203. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.L8150
  22. Lee SK. Economy crisis and change of labor market status (translated by Kim KH). Korean Association of Labor Studies 2001;7(2):67-97. (Korean)
  23. Park JG. The poverty and socio-economic characteristics of female-headed households. The Korea Association of Health and Medical Sociology 2003;13:81-112. (Korean)
  24. Menendez M, Benach J, Muntaner C, Amable M, O'Campo P. Is precarious employment more damaging to women's health than men's? Soc Sci Med 2007; 64(4):776-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.035
  25. Min IS, Cho PS. Panal Data Analysis. The Korean Association of STATA. Seoul. 2009. pp 172. (Korean)