DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A hybrid simulated annealing and optimality criteria method for optimum design of RC buildings

  • Li, Gang (Department of Engineering Mechanics, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis of Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology) ;
  • Lu, Haiyan (School of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology) ;
  • Liu, Xiang (Department of Engineering Mechanics, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis of Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology)
  • Received : 2008.04.30
  • Accepted : 2009.12.28
  • Published : 2010.05.10

Abstract

This paper proposes a hybrid heuristic and criteria-based method of optimum design which combines the advantages of both the iterated simulated annealing (SA) algorithm and the rigorously derived optimality criteria (OC) for structural optimum design of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings under multi-load cases based on the current Chinese design codes. The entire optimum design procedure is divided into two parts: strength optimum design and stiffness optimum design. A modified SA with the strategy of adaptive feasible region is proposed to perform the discrete optimization of RC frame structures under the strength constraints. The optimum stiffness design is conducted using OC method with the optimum results of strength optimum design as the lower bounds of member size. The proposed method is integrated into the commercial software packages for building structural design, SATWE, and for finite element analysis, ANSYS, for practical applications. Finally, two practical frame-shear-wall structures (15-story and 30-story) are optimized to illustrate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed optimum design method.

Keywords

References

  1. Aarts, E.H.L. and van Laarhoven, P.J.M. (1987), Simulated Annealing: Theory and Application, D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
  2. Aschheim, M., Hernndez-Montes, E. and Gil-Martn, L.M. (2007), "Optimal domains for strength design of rectangular sections for axial load and moment according to Eurocode 2", Eng. Struct., 29(8), 1752-1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.021
  3. Balling, R.J. and Yao, X. (1997), "Optimization of reinforced concrete frames", J. Struct. Eng-ASCE, 123(2), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(193)
  4. Chan, C.M. and Zou, X.K. (2004), "Elastic and inelastic drift performance optimization for reinforced concrete building under earthquake loads", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 33, 929-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.385
  5. Chan, C.M. and Sun, S.L. (1997), "Optimal drift design of tall reinforced concrete building frameworks", Adv. Struct. Optim. (Eds. Frangopol, D.M. and Cheng, F.Y.), American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
  6. Chan, C.M. (2001), "Optimal lateral stiffness design of tall building of mixed steel and concrete construction", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 10(3), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.170
  7. Chen, J.J., Che, J.W., Sun, H.A., Ma, H.B. and Cui, M.T. (2002), "Structural dynamic optimization with probability constraints of frequency and mode", Struct. Eng. Mech., 13(5), 479-490. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2002.13.5.479
  8. Cheng, G.D., Li, G. and Cai, Y. (1998), "Reliability-based structural optimization under hazard loads", Struct. Optim., 16, 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202823
  9. Ferreira, C.C., Barros, M.H.F.M. and Barros, A.F.M. (2003), "Optimal design of reinforced concrete T-sections in bending", Eng. Struct., 25, 951-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00039-7
  10. Gong, Y., Xu, L. and Grierson, D.E. (2005), "Performance-based designsensitivity analysis of steel moment frames under earthquake loading", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 63, 1229-1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1312
  11. Guan, H. (2005), "Strut-and-tie model of deep beams with web openings- An optimization approach", Struct. Eng. Mech., 19(4), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.19.4.361
  12. Hernndez-Montes, E., Aschheim, M. and Gil-Martn, L.M. (2004), "The impact of optimal longitudinal reinforcement on the curvature ductility capacity of reinforced concrete column sections", Mag. Concrete Res., 56(9), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2004.56.9.499
  13. Hernndez-Montes, E., Gil-Martn, L.M. and Aschheim, M. (2005), "The design of concrete members subjected to uniaxial bending and compression using reinforcement sizing diagrams", ACI Struct. J., 102(1), 150-158.
  14. Jasbir, S.A. (1997), "Guide to structural optimization", ASCE Manual and Reports on Engineering Practice No.90, 165-196.
  15. Kirpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D. and Vecchi, Jr., M. (1983), "Optimization by simulated annealing", Science, 220, 671-681. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671
  16. Li, G., Zhou, R.G., Duan, L. and Chen, W.F. (1999), "Multi-objective and multilevel optimization for steel frames", Eng. Struct., 21(6), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00226-5
  17. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Rosenbluth, M., Teller, A. and Tell, E. (1953), "Equations of state calculation by fast computing machines", J. Chem. Phys., 21(6), 1087-1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114
  18. Mohan, R.A. and Arvind, N. (2007), "Optimal stacking sequence design of laminate composite structures using tabu embedded simulated annealing", Struct. Eng. Mech., 25(2), 239-268. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.25.2.239
  19. National Standard of the People's Republic of China (2001), Chinese Code for Seismic Design Buildings (GB 50011-2001), Chinese Building Industry Press, Beijing, China.
  20. National Standard of the People's Republic of China (2002), Chinese Code for Concrete Design Buildings (GB 50010-2002), Chinese Building Industry Press. Beijing, China.
  21. Pantelides, C.P. and Tzan, S.R. (1997), "Optimal design of dynamically constraint structures", Comput. Struct., 62(1), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00243-X
  22. Park, H.S. and Hong, K. (2002), "Drift design of steel-frame shear-wall system for tall buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 11, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.187
  23. Park, H.S. and Kwon, J.H. (2003), "Optimal drift design model for multi-story buildings subjected to dynamic lateral forces", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 12, 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.224
  24. Park, H.S. and Sung, C.W. (2002), "Optimization of steel structure using distributed simulated annealing algorithm on a cluster of personal computer", Comput. Struct., 80, 1305-1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00073-1
  25. Parks, G.T. (1990), "An intelligent stochastic optimization routine for nuclear fuel cycle design", Nucl. Technol., 89(2), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34350
  26. Zou, X.K., Chan, C.M., Li, G. and Wang, Q. (2007), "Multi-objective optimization for performance-based design of reinforced concrete frames", J. Struct. Eng-ASCE, 133(10), 1462-1774. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:10(1462)

Cited by

  1. A novel harmony search based optimization of reinforced concrete biaxially loaded columns vol.54, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1097
  2. Life cycle assessment of cost-optimized buttress earth-retaining walls: A parametric study vol.140, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.085
  3. A seismic optimization procedure for reinforced concrete framed buildings based on eigenfrequency optimization vol.49, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2016.1241779
  4. Performance based assessment of reinforced concrete frames designed using eigenfrequency optimization vol.199, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.498
  5. Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using UECBO vol.1, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2016.1.2.119
  6. A Performance-Based Evaluation of a Seismic Design Method for Reinforced Concrete Frames 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309605
  7. Method to Improve Seismic Performance of RC Moment-Resisting Frames Using Geometric Optimization vol.30, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000529
  8. A parametric study of optimum tall piers for railway bridge viaducts vol.45, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.6.723
  9. Practitioner-friendly design method to improve the seismic performance of RC frame buildings vol.37, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020988019