DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Endovascular Coil Embolization of Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms

  • Chae, Kil-Sung (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jeon, Pyoung (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Keon-Ha (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Tae (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Jin (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Byun, Hong-Sik (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2010.03.23
  • 심사 : 2010.06.16
  • 발행 : 2010.10.01

초록

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the results of endovascular coil embolization for very small aneurysms (${\leq}$ 3 mm). Materials and Methods: Between March 2005 and December 2008, a total of 31 very small aneurysms in 30 patients were treated by coil embolization. Of the 31 aneurysms, five (16%) were ruptured, as opposed to 26 (84%) that were not. We assessed the procedural complications, immediate angiographic outcome after coiling, clinical outcome, and follow-up MR angiography (MRA). Results: Two thromboembolic complications occurred during the procedure, but did not lead to any persistent neurologic deficit. No procedural aneurysmal rupture was observed and procedure-related morbidity and mortality were both 0%. Occlusion was adequate in 25 aneurysms (81%) and incomplete in six aneurysms (19%). The clinical outcomes of five patients with ruptured aneurysms were good (Glasgow outcome scale ${\geq}$ 4), with no bleeding of the treated aneurysms during a mean follow-up period of 13.3 months. On 27 follow-up MRA, there was no recurrence, and the five incompletely occluded aneurysms showed a spontaneous amelioration resulting in an adequate occlusion. Conclusion: Coil embolization of very small aneurysms is technically feasible with good results. The long-term efficacy and the potential as a standard treatment strategy remain to be determined by randomized large trials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809-817 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5
  2. Nguyen TN, Raymond J, Guilbert F, Roy D, Berube MD, Mahmoud M, et al. Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1088-1092 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/6/1088
  3. Sluzewski M, Bosch JA, van Rooij WJ, Nijssen PC, Wijnalda D. Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. J Neurosurg 2001;94:238-240 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0238
  4. Lim YC, Kim BM, Shin YS, Kim SY, Chung J. Structural limitations of currently available microcatheters and coils for endovascular coiling of very small aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2008;50:423-427 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-008-0365-y
  5. van Rooij WJ, Keeren GJ, Peluso JP, Sluzewski M. Clinical and angiographic results of coiling of 196 very small (< or = 3 mm) intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:835-839 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1429
  6. Suzuki S, Kurata A, Ohmomo T, Sagiuchi T, Niki J, Yamada M, et al. Endovascular surgery for very small ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2006;105:777-780 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.105.5.777
  7. Pierot L, Spelle L, Vitry F; ATENA Investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497-2504 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512756
  8. Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Rabinstein A, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis. Stroke 2010;41:116-121 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566356
  9. Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1706-1709
  10. Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A. Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Long-term angiographic and clinical results. Apropos of 56 cases. J Neuroradiol 1997;24:30-44 [French]
  11. Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, Piotin M, Castaings L, Rey A, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348-356
  12. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398-1403 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9
  13. Gallas S, Pasco A, Cottier JP, Gabrillargues J, Drouineau J, Cognard C, et al. A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1723-1731
  14. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RS, Sneade M, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538-1544 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.466987
  15. Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, Gobin YP, Jahan R, Frazee J, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98:959-966 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959
  16. Nguyen TN, Hoh BL, Amin-Hanjani S, Pryor JC, Ogilvy CS. Comparison of ruptured vs unruptured aneurysms in recanalization after coil embolization. Surg Neurol 2007:68:19-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2006.10.021
  17. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3
  18. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, Part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1001-1008 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0662

피인용 문헌

  1. Prevalence of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm on MR Angiography vol.12, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2011.12.5.547
  2. Time-Resolved 3D Contrast-Enhanced MRA on 3.0T: a Non-Invasive Follow-Up Technique after Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of the Intracranial Aneurysm vol.12, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2011.12.6.662
  3. Endovascular treatment of very small (≤ 3 mm) intracranial aneurysms: An updated systemic review vol.16, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1633.2012.00590.x
  4. Endovascular Treatment of Very Small and Very Large Ruptured Aneurysms of the Anterior Cerebral Circulation: A Single-Center Experience vol.35, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1159/000347078
  5. Coil-Protected Embolization Technique for a Branch-Incorporated Aneurysm vol.14, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.329
  6. A case of ruptured ultra small aneurysm with a short axis of 1.0 mm successfully treated by coil embolization using a single Target nano coil: technical note vol.8, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.2014-0022
  7. Ultra-small diameter coils for treatment of intracranial aneurysms vol.21, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15274/inr-2014-10105
  8. Conventional endovascular treatment of small intracranial aneurysms is not associated with additional risks compared with treatment of larger aneurysms vol.7, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011133
  9. Treatment Results of Coil Embolization for Very Small (&le;3mm) Intracranial Aneurysms vol.43, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2335/scs.43.275
  10. Endovascular Treatment of Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Meta-Analysis vol.37, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a4651
  11. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Due to Small (3 mm or Less) Cerebral Aneurysms vol.45, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2335/scs.45.126
  12. Safety and efficacy of treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms vol.84, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2019.89159
  13. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of ruptured tiny cerebral aneurysms compared with ruptured larger aneurysms vol.26, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019919897446
  14. Endovascular Coil Embolization of Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms vol.49, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2335/scs.49.379