Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.75-83
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: a Preliminary Study

  • Zhu, Yunkai (Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chen, Yaqing (Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jiang, Jun (Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Wang, Ren (Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University) ;
  • Zhou, Yongchang (Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University) ;
  • Zhang, Huizhen (Department of Pathology, Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University)
  • 투고 : 2009.06.07
  • 심사 : 2009.08.10
  • 발행 : 2010.02.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To determine whether contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography can be used to predict the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography was performed in 103 patients suspected of prostate cancer before biopsy. Time intensity curves were reconstructed for systematic biopsy sites and sonographic abnormalities. The characteristics of the curves were described using hemodynamic indices including arrival time (AT), time-to-peak (TTP), and peak intensity (PI). The differences of hemodynamic indices between high-grade and low-grade cancer were analyzed and the correlations between the hemodynamic indices and biopsy Gleason score were studied. Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 41 of 103 patients and there were significant differences in the hemodynamic indices between the biopsy sites of the non-malignant patients and prostate cancer lesions (p < 0.05). The prostate biopsies revealed 154 prostate cancer lesions, including 31 low-grade lesions and 123 high-grade lesions. The hemodynamic indices AT and TTP of highgrade tumors were significantly shorter than those of low-grade tumors (p = 0.001, 0.002). In addition, high-grade peripheral zone (PZ) tumors had higher PI than low-grade PZ tumors (p = 0.009). The PZ prostate cancer Gleason score correlated with PI, AT and TTP, with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.223, -0.335, and -0.351, respectively (p = 0.013, < 0.001 and < 0.001). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of hemodynamic indices correlate with the prostate cancer Gleason score.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality

참고문헌

  1. Wilson NM, Masoud AM, Barsoum HB, Refaat MM, Moustafa MI, Kamal TA. Correlation of power Doppler with microvessel density in assessing prostate needle biopsy. Clin Radiol 2004;59:946-950 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.03.021
  2. Volavsek M, Masera A, Ovcak Z. Incidental prostatic carcinoma. A predictive role of neoangiogenesis and comparison with other prognostic factors. Pathol Oncol Res 2000;6:191-196 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032372
  3. Goldberg BB, Liu JB, Forsberg F. Ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:319-333 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(94)90001-9
  4. Halpern EJ. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Rev Urol 2006;8:S29-S37
  5. Ko EY, Lee SH, Kim HH, Kim SM, Shin MJ, Kim N, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with a second-generation US contrast medium in a rat breast tumor model. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:243-249 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.3.243
  6. Lee SH, Suh JS, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Kim N, Suh SH. Quantitative assessment of synovial vascularity using contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography: correlation with histologic findings and MR imaging findings in arthritic rabbit knee model. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:45-53 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.45
  7. Frauscher F, Klauser A, Volgger H, Halpern EJ, Pallwein L, Steiner H, et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. J Urol 2002;167:1648-1652 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65171-3
  8. Pelzer A, Bektic J, Berger AP, Pallwein L, Halpern EJ, Horninger W, et al. Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy. J Urol 2005;173:1926-1929 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000158444.56199.03
  9. Roy C, Buy X, Lang H, Saussine C, Jacqmin D. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler endorectal sonography of prostate: efficiency for detecting peripheral zone tumors and role for biopsy procedure. J Urol 2003;170:69-72 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000072342.01573.8d
  10. Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Strasser H, Schafer G, et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score. J Urol 2007;178:464-468 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.107
  11. Bono AV, Celato N, Cova V, Salvadore M, Chinetti S, Novario R. Microvessel density in prostate carcinoma. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2002;5:123-127 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500572
  12. Bostwick DG, Wheeler TM, Blute M, Barrett DM, MacLennan GT, Sebo TJ, et al. Optimized microvessel density analysis improves prediction of cancer stage from prostate needle biopsies. Urology 1996;48:47-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00149-5
  13. Borre M, Offersen BV, Nerstrom B, Overgaard J. Microvessel density predicts survival in prostate cancer patients subjected to watchful waiting. Br J Cancer 1998;78:940-944 https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.605
  14. Goossen TE, de la Rosette JJ, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van Leenders GJ, Wijkstra H. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced power Doppler ultrasound imaging in the localization of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003;43:124-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00582-1
  15. Emiliozzi P, Corsetti A, Tassi B, Federico G, Martini M, Pansadoro V. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. Urology 2003;61:961-966 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02551-7
  16. Emiliozzi P, Longhi S, Scarpone P, Pansadoro A, DePaula F, Pansadoro V. The value of a single biopsy with 12 transperineal cores for detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen. J Urol 2001;166:845-850 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65849-1
  17. Pinthus JH, Witkos M, Fleshner NE, Sweet J, Evans A, Jewett MA, et al. Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome. J Urol 2006;176:979-984 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.102
  18. Steinberg DM, Sauvageot J, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI. Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:566-576 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199705000-00010

피인용 문헌

  1. Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer vol.29, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0747-3
  2. Neue Ultraschalltechnologien für die Diagnostik des Prostatakarzinoms vol.51, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-011-2178-y
  3. Role of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Consensus Panel vol.110, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11072.x
  4. Factors influencing the degree of enhancement of prostate cancer on contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography: correlation with biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens vol.85, pp.1019, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/63794331
  5. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Quantification of Tissue Perfusion vol.34, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.34.2.179
  6. Mathematical Models of Contrast Transport Kinetics for Cancer Diagnostic Imaging: A Review vol.9, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2016.2583541
  7. Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial neoplasms vol.12, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5206
  8. Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound for prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness: The role of normal peripheral zone time-intensity curves vol.6, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38643
  9. Utility of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up of Prostate Cancer: State of the Art vol.57, pp.suppl3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.177196
  10. Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound in Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer vol.19, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0836-6
  11. Association Between Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Indicators and Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Treatment vol.12, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s250907