DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improved analysis of palm creases

  • Park, Jin-Seo (Department of Anatomy, Dongguk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Sun (Department of Anatomy, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Won-Sug (Department of Anatomy, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Min-Suk (Department of Anatomy, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2010.05.06
  • Accepted : 2010.06.07
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Palm creases are helpful in revealing anthropologic characteristics and diagnosing chromosomal aberrations, and have been analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. However, previous methods of analyzing palm creases were not objective so that reproducibility could not be guaranteed. In this study, a more objective morphologic analysis of palm creases was developed. The features of the improved methods include the strict definition of major and minor palm creases and the systematic classification of major palm creases based on their relationships, branches, and variants. Furthermore, based on the analysis of 3,216 Koreans, palm creases were anthropologically interpreted. There was a tendency for palm creases to be evenly distributed on the palm, which was acknowledged by the relationship between major and minor creases as well as by the incidences of major creases types. This tendency was consistent with the role of palm creases to facilitate folding of palm skin. The union of major palm creases was frequent in males and right palms to have powerful hand grip. The new method of analyzing palm creases is expected to be widely used for anthropologic investigation and chromosomal diagnosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Alter M. (1970). Variation in palmar creases. Am J Dis Child 120: 424-431
  2. Caplan RM. (1990). How fingerprints came into use for personal identifi cation. J Am Acad Dermatol 23: 109-114 https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(90)70194-M
  3. Chaube R. (1977). Palmar creases in population studies. Am J Phys Anthropol 47: 7-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330470104
  4. Chung MS, Kim YS, Kim HJ, Sohn HJ, Han HS. (2000). Dermatoglyphic characteristics of the Korean patients with numeral aberrations of chromosome. Korean J Phys Anthropol 13: 31-38 https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2000.13.1.31
  5. Dar H, Jaffe M. (1983). Dermatoglyphic and palmar-crease alterations as indicators of early intra-uterine insult in mental retardation. Dev Med Child Neurol 25: 53-59
  6. Dar H, Schmidt R. (1976). Topographic approach for analysis of palm crease variants. J Med Genet 13: 310-313 https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.13.4.310
  7. Dar H, Schmidt R, Nitowsky HM. (1977). Palmar crease variants and their clinical significance: a study of newborns at risk. Pediatr Res 11: 103-108 https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-197702000-00004
  8. Davies PA. (1966). Sex and the single transverse palmar crease in newborn singletons. Dev Med Child Neurol 8: 729-734
  9. Edelstein J, Amylon M, Walsh JA. (1991). Dermatoglyphics and acute lymphocytic leukemia in children. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 8: 30-38 https://doi.org/10.1177/104345429100800106
  10. Eswaraiah G, Bali RS. (1978). Palmar flexion creases and dermatoglyphics in leprosy patients. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 46: 56-60
  11. Jones KL, Robinson LK, Bakhireva LN, et al. (2006). Accuracy of the diagnosis of physical features of fetal alcohol syndrome by pediatricians after specialized training. Pediatrics 118: e1734-1738 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1037
  12. Oorthuys AM, de Vaan GA, Behrendt H, Geerts SJ. (1979). Palmar flexion creases in childhood neoplasia. Cancer 43: 749-759 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197902)43:2<749::AID-CNCR2820430252>3.0.CO;2-Z
  13. Popich GA, Smith DW. (1970). The genesis and signifi cance of digital and palmar hand creases: preliminary report. J Pediatr 77: 1017-1023 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(70)80086-5
  14. Purvis-Smith SG, Menser MA. (1968). Dermatoglyphics in adults with congenital rubella. Lancet 2: 141-143
  15. Tay JS. (1979). The genetics of palmar creases. A study in the inheritance of liability estimated from the incidence among relatives. Ann Hum Genet 42: 327-332 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1979.tb00666.x

Cited by

  1. The superficial anatomical landmarks are not reliable for predicting the recurrent branch of the median nerve vol.42, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02475-x