Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

Fracture Resistance of Low Invasive Fixed Partial Dentures

수종 저 침습 고정성 국소의치의 수직하중에 대한 저항

  • Choi, Jong-In (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shin, Chang-Yong (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Dong, Jin-Keun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 최종인 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김유리 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신창용 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 동진근 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2010.07.06
  • Accepted : 2010.09.25
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims at contributing to the restorative dentistry by examining results in the vertical load test of four different low invasive fixed partial dentures. Based on a hypothesis on the right upper first molar is missing, three units of FPDs were made for the second premolar and the second molar abutment. that is, twelve metal dies and FPDs were made for resin bonded FPD and Two Key Bridges and Human Bridge without occlusal rest and Human Bridge with occlusal rest. By using universal test machine, the numerical maximum value were recorded during the vertical load test of each FPDs after the bonding process treated by Maxcem which is resin cement. The failure process and its result of prosthesis were also observed. The maximum load was 7,295 N, 4,729 N, 2,190 N, 3,073 N from groups of resin bonded FPD, Two Key Bridge, Human Bridge without occlusal rest and Human Bridge with occlusal rest respectively. There was a statistical significance among the groups of resin bonded FPD, Two Key Bridge and Human Brides. However, there was no significant difference between Human Bridge without occlusal rest and Human Bridge with occlusal rest. Regarding the failure of prosthesis, the groups of Resin Bonded FPD and Two Key Bridge showed that one of the abutment teeth in the both side of retention part was highly failed earlier than the other one (83.2% and 66.6% respectively). While, Human Bridge without occlusal rest and Human Bridge with occlusal rest showed high percentage of failure in the abutment teeth in the both side of retention part at the same time (91.6% and 58.3% respectively). This study demonstrates that the group of Human Bridges has low resistance to the vertical loads of low invasive FPDs in comparison with the groups of resin bonded FPD and Two Key Bridge. Nevertheless, the maximum occlusal load of the restorative position, resistance to diverse restoration failure, amount of tooth reduction and patients' cooperation should be considered when they are applied in the clinic in order to choose an appropriate restoration for each patient.

본 연구의 목적은 4 종류의 저 침습 고정성 국소의치의 수직하중에 대한 저항을 연구하여 임상 활용에 도움을 주기 위함이다. 상악 우측 제 1 대구치 결손을 가정하여 상악 제 2 대구치와 제 2 소구치를 지대치로 하는 고정성 국소의치 금속 다이를 제작하고 4 종류의 저 침습 고정성 국소의치 (Resin bonded FPD, Two Key Bridge, Human Bridge without occlusal rest, Human Bridge with occlusal rest)를 제작하였다. 만능 시험기를 이용하여 수직하중을 가하여 실패 시의 최대 하중을 기록하고 실패 유형을 기록하였다. 평균 최대 하중은 Resin bonded FPD 군이 7,295 N, Two Key Bridge 군이 4,729 N, Human Bridge without occlusal rest 군이 2,190 N, Human Bridge with occlusal rest 군이 3,073 N 이었다. Resin bonded FPD, Two Key Bridge, Human Bridge 군 사이에는 통계학적 유의차가 있었으나 occlusal rest 의 유무에 따른 Human bridge 군 사이에서는 통계학적 유의차가 없었다. 보철물 실패양상은 Resin bonded FPD와 Two Key Bridge는 양측 지대치의 유지부 한쪽이 탈락되는 경우가 양측 모두 탈락되는 경우보다 많았으며 Human Bridge 군은 모두 지대치 양측의 유지부가 함께 탈락되는 경우가 한쪽이 탈락된 경우보다 더 많았다. 본 연구에서 저 침습 고정성 국소의치의 수직 하중에 대한 저항은 Human Bridge 군이 resin bonded FPD 군이나 Two key Bridge 군에 비하여 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 임상에 적용할 때에는 이와 같은 파절 저항을 고려하여 수복 위치의 최대 교합을 참고하는 것은 물론이고 각종 수복물의 탈락에 대한 저항, 그리고 치질의 삭제량, 환자의 협조도 등을 고려하여 각각의 환자에 적합한 수복물을 선택해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yi JW, Cho IH, Lee JH, Kim SK. A comparative study of the resistance to dislodgement of fixed prostheses using $Bio-pin^{{\circledR}}$. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2005;43(2):176-190.
  2. Lee CH. Effect of various resin cements to the shear bond strength in the adhesion bridge. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1996;34(4):791-799.
  3. Barrack G. Recent advances in etched cast restorations. J Prsthet Dent 1984;52:619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90128-8
  4. Goerig AC, Mueninghoff LA. Management of the endodontically treated tooth. Part I. Concept for restorative design. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:340-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90274-3
  5. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic resin filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  6. Rochette AL. Attachment of splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:418-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90163-7
  7. Moon PC, Knap FJ. Acid-ehched bridge bond strength utilizing a new retention method. J Dent Res 1983;62:296.
  8. Moon PC. Bond strength of the lost salt procedure: A new retention method for resin bonded fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:435-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90009-6
  9. Livaditis GJ, Thompson VP. Ethched castings: An improved retentive mechanism for resin-bonded retainer. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:52-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90242-6
  10. Laufer BZ, Nicholls JI, Townsand JD. SiOx-C coating: A composite to metal bonding mechanism. J Prosthet Dent 1986;60:320-327.
  11. Imbery TA, Davis RD. Evaluation of tin plating system for a high-noble alloy. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:55-59.
  12. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Takaki A. Surface treatment of non precious alloys for adhesion fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55:456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90176-9
  13. Kohlis S, Levine WA, Grisius RJ, Fenster RK. The effact of three different treatment on the tensile strength of resin bond to nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:4-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90255-B
  14. Briggs P, Bishop K. The single unit, single retainer, cantilever resin bonded bridge. Br Dent J 1996;181: 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809263
  15. Hussey DL, Pagni C, Linden GJ. Performance of 400 adhesive bridge fitted in restorative dentistry department. J Dent 1991;19:221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(91)90122-F
  16. Choi KS. Artificial teeth for dental department. Korean patent 20-1999-0024381, 1996.
  17. Kwon OD. Dental prosthesis and it's manufacturing. Korean patent 10-2006-0001540, 2006.
  18. Doh RM, Lee KW. Dislodgement resintance of modified resin-bonded fixed partial dentures utilizing tooth undercuts : an in vitro study. J Adv prosthodont 2009;1:95-90.
  19. Thompson VP , Castillo ED and Livaditis GJ. Resinbonded retainers. Part I:Resin bond to electrolytically etched non precious alloys. J Dent Res 1983 ;50:771-779.
  20. Jung KT, Yang JH, Lee SH, Jung HY. An experiment study on the bond strength of adhesive resin to sueexssively recast alloys for resin bonded restorations. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1990;28:53-76.
  21. Osama AM., Smith BGN, Brown D. Bond strengths of three chemical adhesive cement adhered to nickel chormium alloy for direct bonded retainer. J. Prosthet Dent 1990;63:137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90096-U
  22. Williams VD, Drennon DG, Silverstone LM. The effact of retainer design on the retention of filled resin in acid etched fixed partial dentures. J. Prosthet Dent 1982;48:417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90078-6
  23. Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Retainer design for posterior resin bonded fixed partial dentures: A technical report. Quintessence Int 2004;35:653-654.
  24. Chow TW, Chung RW, Chu FC, Newsome PR. Tooth preparation designed for posterior resin bonded fixed partial dentures:a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:561-564. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129374
  25. Omar El-Mowafy, Rubo MH. Retention of posterior resin bonded fixed partial denture with modified design: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13: 425-431.
  26. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. Quintessence books second edition. 217-229.
  27. Field WD, Proffit WR, Case JC, Vig KWL. Variable affecting measurement of vertical occlusal force. J Dent Res 1986;65:135-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650020901