Analysis of Brain Activation due to Mouth Shape during Grip Movement

잡기동작 수행 시 입모양에 따른 뇌활성화 분석

  • Shim, Je-Myung (Department of Physical Therapy, Gimhae University) ;
  • Kim, Hwan-Hee (Occupational Therapy, Graduate school of Rehabilitation Science, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Chung-Sun (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University)
  • 심제명 (김해대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 김환희 (인제대학교 대학원 재활과학과 작업치료) ;
  • 김중선 (대구대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2010.06.30
  • Accepted : 2010.08.20
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

Purpose : This study was performed to understand the relationship between hand and mouth shapes using functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI). Methods : Two healthy volunteers without any previous history of physical or neurological illness were recruited. fMRI was done that volunteers was 6 repeated of natural mouth, close mouth and open mouth while power grip and pinch grip movement. Results : Cerebral cortex activation was not well observed for the natural mouth during the power grip exercise. For the closed mouth, the temporal lobe, Broca's area, the prefrontal area related to thinking and judgment, the supplementary motor area, the auditory area and Wernicke's area were activated. For the open mouth, cortical activation was also observed in the temporal lobe, Wernicke's area, the prefrontal area related to thinking and the orbital frontal area related to visual sense. During the pinch grip exercise, cortical activation was observed for the natural mouth in the primary sensory area, Wernicke's area, the primary and supplementary motor area, and the prefrontal area. For the closed mouth, cortical activation was observed in the temporal lobe, Wernicke's area, the prefrontal area related to thinking, the secondary visual area, the primary sensory area and the supplementary motor area. In the case of the open mouth, cortical activation was observed in a few parts in the temporal lobe as well as Wernicke's area, the prefrontal area related to thinking, and other areas related to visual sense such as the primary visual area, the secondary visual area and the visual association area. Conclusion : Brain was more activation for close mouth and open mouth more than natural mouth movement.

Keywords

References

  1. 장미리, 경직성 양지마비 학생의 손기능 평가 연구. 단국대학교 특수교육대학원 석사학위논문. 2000.
  2. Allison T, Puce A, Spencer DD, et al. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception: I. Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb Cortex. 1999; 9(5):415-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/9.5.415
  3. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues; role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(7):267 -78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01501-1
  4. Alomar X, Medrano J, Cabratosa J, et al. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Seminars in Ultrasound. 2007;28(3): 170-83. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2007.02.002
  5. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001; 13(2):400-4.
  6. Farah MJ. Why does the somatosensory homunculus have hands next to face and feet next to genitals? A hypothesis. Neural Comput. 1998;10(8):1983-5. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976698300016936
  7. Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R, Nihashi T, et al. Homuncular representation in the somatosensory cortices revealed by somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. International Congress Series. 2002;1232:41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5131(01)00704-X
  8. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM. Principles of Neural Science New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  9. McCarthy G, Puce A, Belger A, et al. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generted in occipitotemporal cortcx. Cereb Cortex. 1999;9(5):431-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/9.5.431
  10. Napier JR. 손의 신비(진화의 비밀을 움켜쥔 손의 역사). 서울:지호. 이지아 역 2000.
  11. Nguyen BT, Tran TD, Hoshiyama M, et al. Face representation in the human primary somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Res. 2004;50(2):227-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2004.07.004
  12. Puce A, Allison T. Differential processing of mobile and static faces by temporal cortex. Neurolmage. 1999;9(6):S801.
  13. Puce A, Allison T, Bentin S, et al. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J Neurosci. 1998;18(6):2188-99.
  14. Ramachandran VS. Plasticity and functional recovery in neurology. Clin Med, 2005;5(4):368-73. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.5-4-368
  15. Tamura Y, Shibukawa Y, Shintani M, et al. Oral structure representation in human somatosensory cortex. Neurolmage. 2008;43(1):128-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.040
  16. Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Puce A. The spatiotemporal dynamics of the face inversion effect: a magnetoand electro-encephalographic study. Neuroscience. 2003; 116(3):879-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00752-2