The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain

  • Jung, Yu-Seok (Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Whang (Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Yeon-Jo (Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University) ;
  • Ahn, Jin-Soo (Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Huh, Jung-Bo (Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
  • Received : 2010.08.06
  • Accepted : 2010.09.06
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study was conducted to evaluate clinical validity of a zirconia full-coverage crown by comparing zirconia's wear capacity over antagonistic teeth with that of feldspathic dental porcelain. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The subject groups were divided into three groups: the polished feldspathic dental porcelain group (Group 1), the polished zirconia group (Group 2), and the polished zirconia with glazing group (Group 3). Twenty specimens were prepared from each group. Each procedure such as plasticity, condensation, and glazing was conducted according to the manufacturer's manual. A wear test was conducted with 240,000 chewing cycles using a dual-axis chewing simulator. The degree of wear of the antagonistic teeth was calculated by measuring the volume loss using a three-dimensional profiling system and ANSUR 3D software. The statistical significance of the measured degree of wear was tested with a significant level of 5% using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey test. RESULTS. The degrees of wear of the antagonistic teeth were $0.119{\pm}0.059\;mm^3$ in Group 1, $0.078{\pm}0.063\;mm^3$ in Group 3, and $0.031{\pm}0.033\;mm^3$ in Group 2. Statistical significance was found between Group 1 and Groups 2 and between Group 2 and 3, whereas no statistical significance was found between Group 1 and Group 3. CONCLUSION. Despite the limitations of this study on the evaluation of antagonistic teeth wear, the degree of antagonistic tooth wear was less in zirconia than feldspathic dental porcelain, representing that the zirconia may be more beneficial in terms of antagonistic tooth wear.

Keywords

References

  1. Ardlin BI. Transformation-toughened zirconia for dental inlays, crowns and bridges: chemical stability and effect of low-temperature aging on flexural strength and surface structure. Dent Mater 2002;18:590-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00095-1
  2. Sobrinho LC, Cattell MJ, Glover RH, Knowles JC. Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue properties of three all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:255-62.
  3. Campbell SD, Sozio RB. Evaluation of the fit and strength of an all-ceramic fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:301- 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90177-1
  4. Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Imanishi A, Nakamura T, Ishigaki S. Fracture resistance of pressable glass-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:951-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00929.x
  5. Komine F, Tomic M, Gerds T, Strub JR. Influence of different adhesive resin cements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:359-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.018
  6. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:415-26.
  7. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  8. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:441-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.003
  9. Fisher RM, Moore BK, Swartz ML, Dykema RW. The effects of enamel wear on the metal-porcelain interface. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:627-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90198-1
  10. Krejci I, Lutz F, Gautschi L. Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:233-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90335-2
  11. Krejci I, Mueller E, Lutz F. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on adhesive composite crowns. J Dent Res 1994;73:1228- 32. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061501
  12. DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Pintado MR. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1985;1:238-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80050-6
  13. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R, Pintado MR. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1986;2:235-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80034-3
  14. Krejci I, Lutz F. In vitro evaluation of two composite material for posterior restorations. Stomatol DDR 1990;40:326-32.
  15. De Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 1986;65:654-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650050401
  16. Sulong MZ, Aziz RA. Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:342-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90209-U
  17. DeLong R, Sasik C, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dent Mater 1989;5:266- 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90073-0
  18. Harrison A. Wear of combinations of acrylic resin and porcelain, on an abrasion testing machine. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:111-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01202.x
  19. Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;82:154-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0018
  20. Gallegos LI, Nicholls JI. In vitro two-body wear of three veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:172-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90310-1
  21. Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70:221- 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700031301
  22. Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De Boever J. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:338-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90217-8
  23. Wiley MG. Effects of porcelain on occluding surfaces of restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:133-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90360-0
  24. Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:451- 9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123851
  25. DeLong R, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, Pintado MR. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater 1986;2:214-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80016-1

Cited by

  1. Full Zirconia Fixed Detachable Implant-Retained Restorations Manufactured from Monolithic Zirconia: Clinical Report after Two Years in Service vol.20, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00784.x
  2. Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics vol.16, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0589-9
  3. Influence of Full-Contour Zirconia Surface Roughness on Wear of Glass-Ceramics vol.23, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12088
  4. Maxillary cement retained implant supported monolithic zirconia prosthesis in a full mouth rehabilitation: a clinical report vol.5, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.209
  5. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review vol.5, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.73
  6. vol.71, pp.3-4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.696690
  7. A comparative study of sliding wear of nonmetallic dental restorative materials with emphasis on micromechanical wear mechanisms vol.103, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33193
  8. A Novel Coping Design to Decrease Maximum Principal Stress in Zirconia Ceramic Restorations vol.23, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12147
  9. In Vitro Wear Behavior of Zirconia Opposing Enamel: A Systematic Review vol.23, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12167
  10. Wear performance of bovine tooth enamel against translucent tetragonal zirconia polycrystals after different surface treatments vol.33, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-097
  11. 3Y-TZP In-Depth Phase Transformation by Raman Spectroscopy: A Comparison of Three Methods vol.97, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12892
  12. Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown vol.7, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.271
  13. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness of Four Ceramic Materials after Occlusal Adjustment vol.28, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12222
  14. Evaluation of marginal and internal gap under model-free monolithic zirconia restoration fabricated by digital intraoral scanner vol.54, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2016.54.3.210
  15. Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface roughness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material vol.8, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.16
  16. Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns vol.8, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.43
  17. A Study on Topographical Properties and Surface Wettability of Monolithic Zirconia after Use of Diverse Polishing Instruments with Different Surface Coatings pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12515
  18. Zirconia ceramics in metal-free implant dentistry vol.116, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2016.1264537
  19. Fatigue behaviours of the zirconia dental restorations prepared by two manufacturing methods vol.116, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2017.1336365
  20. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods vol.31, pp.suppl 1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058
  21. Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns—Results of Different Dental Practitioner Groups vol.5, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040030
  22. Wear Evaluation of Prosthetic Materials Opposing Themselves vol.43, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2341/16-212-L
  23. Surface Properties of Dental Zirconia after Clinical Grinding and Polishing vol.529-530, pp.1662-9795, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.529-530.501
  24. Development of a Novel Biomimetic Dental Wear System vol.15, pp.1662-100X, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBTE.15.23
  25. Comparative evaluation of surface roughness of posterior primary zirconia crowns pp.1996-9805, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0382-4
  26. Assessment of Antagonist Enamel Wear and Clinical Performance of Full-Contour Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: One-Year Results of a Prospective Study pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12960
  27. The effect of abrading and cutting instruments on machinability of dental ceramics vol.29, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6031-y
  28. Mica glass ceramics for dental restorations pp.1753-5557, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2018.1494240
  29. Effects of Polishing Bur Application Force and Reuse on Sintered Zirconia Surface Topography vol.43, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2341/17-105-LR
  30. Grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia versus the conventional dry-pressed and sintered zirconia ceramics pp.1743-6761, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2018.1472904
  31. Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review pp.1059941X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12800
  32. Artificial Enamel Wear after Prolonged Chewing Simulation against Monolithic Y-TZP Crowns vol.09, pp.04, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2018.94026
  33. Zirconia, is It the Next Change in Esthetic Dentistry? vol.2, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/ijoprd-2-4-v
  34. Zirconia, is It the Next Change in Esthetic Dentistry? vol.2, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/ijoprd-2-4-v
  35. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Lower Molar Tooth Restored with Fully Milled and Layered Zirconia Crowns vol.1, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2014.01.00022
  36. Esthetic Prosthetic Restorations: Reliability and Effects on Antagonist Dentition vol.9, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010473
  37. Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns vol.2015, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/418641
  38. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry vol.30, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470
  39. 외인성 및 내인성 요인에 의한 치아부식에 대한 치료 증례 vol.33, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2017.33.1.42
  40. Microleakage and penetration depth of different fissure sealant materials after cyclic thermo-mechanic and brushing simulation vol.37, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-234
  41. Evaluation of hardness and wear of surface treated zirconia on enamel wear. An in-vitro study vol.4, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2017.10.001
  42. Experimental Comparison on Dental BioTribological Pairs Zirconia/Zirconia and Zirconia/Natural Tooth by Using a Reciprocating Tribometer vol.43, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1230-8
  43. Effect of Nano-filled Protective Coating on Microhardness and Wear Resistance of Glass-ionomer Cements vol.46, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2019.46.2.226
  44. Tribology and Dentistry: A Commentary vol.7, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants7060052
  45. Wear Characteristics of Dental Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Opposing Various Dental Composite Resins vol.12, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111839
  46. Simulated occlusal adjustments and their effects on zirconia and antagonist artificial enamel vol.11, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.3.162
  47. Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance vol.7, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030090
  48. Evolution of Indirect Restorations for Fixed Prosthodontics: Planning, Preparation and Cementation vol.8, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1308/205016819827601554
  49. Surface, Microstructural, and Mechanical Characterization of Prefabricated Pediatric Zirconia Crowns vol.12, pp.20, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203280
  50. Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials vol.12, pp.22, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12223684
  51. Surface roughness of two different monolithic materials after chewing simulation vol.12, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_272_19
  52. Measurement of dental crown wear -In vitro study vol.39, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-280
  53. Suitability of 3D printed pieces of nanocrystalline zirconia for dental applications vol.36, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.006
  54. The application of 3D printed self-glazed zirconia for full-mouth rehabilitation in a patient with severely worn dentition: a case report vol.119, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2019.1666579
  55. A State-of-the-Art Review on the Wear of the Occlusal Surfaces of Natural Teeth and Prosthetic Crowns vol.13, pp.16, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163525
  56. Zahnfarbene Werkstoffe für festsitzenden Zahnersatz und ihre Funktion - was wissen wir? vol.129, pp.12, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1300-0205
  57. Effect of ionizing radiation and chewing simulation on human enamel and zirconia vol.65, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_592
  58. Irradiation therapy and chewing simulation: effect on zirconia and human enamel vol.65, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_20_00018
  59. Ex Vivo Assessment of Natural Teeth Wear against Zirconia and Novel Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Composite Crowns in Primary Teeth by a Three-Dimensional Assessment Method vol.2021, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9670982
  60. Classification and Properties of Dental Zirconia as Implant Fixtures and Superstructures vol.14, pp.17, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174879