A Study on the Dose Changes Depending on the Shielding Block Type of Irradiation During Electron Beam Theraphy

전자선치료 시 조사부위 차폐물 형태에 따른 선량변화 연구

  • Lee, Sun-Yeb (Department of Radiological Science, HALLYM COLLEGE) ;
  • Park, Cheol-Soo (Department of Radiological Science, HALLYM COLLEGE) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Seung (Department of Physics, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Goo, Eun-Hoe (Department of Physics, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Cho, Jae-Hwan (Department of Radiological Science, Gyeonesan University College) ;
  • Kim, Eng-Chan (Department of Physics, Yeungam University) ;
  • Moon, Soo-Ho (Department of Physics, Yeungam University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Department of Radiation Oncology, Boondang CHA Hospital) ;
  • Park, Cheol-Woo (Department of Radiological Science, Dong-Eui Science College) ;
  • Dong, Kyung-Rae (Department of Radiological Science, Gwangju Health College) ;
  • Kweon, Dae-Cheol (Department of Radiological Science, Shinheung College)
  • Received : 2010.06.07
  • Accepted : 2010.09.06
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

The primary focus of this study was to explore the variation in dose distributions of electron beams between different types of construction structure of cut-out blocks embodied in electron cones, given that the structure is considered one of the causes of multiple scattered radiation from electrons which may affect dose distributions. For evaluation, two types of cut-out blocks, divergency and straight, manufactured for this study, were compared in terms of area of interval in distribution of dose, and flatness and symmetric state of surface being radiated. The results showed that divergency cut-out blocks reduced the lateral scattering effects on the thickness of cut-out blocks more substantially than straight ones, leading to more uniform dose distribution at baseline depth. Notably in divergency cut-out blocks, the high dose area decreased more significantly, and more uniform dose distribution was observed at the edge of the irradiated field. This points to a need to consider the characteristics of dose distribution of electron beams when setting up radiotherapy planing at the venues. Therefore, this study is significant as an exploratory work for ensuring high accuracy in dose delivery for patients.

전자의 다중산란에 의한 선량분포를 좌우하는 다양한 원인으로서 조사통에 삽입되는 차폐물의 제작형태에 따른 전자선의 선량분포를 알고자 하였다. 실험을 위하여 선속 확산현상을 고려한 차폐물(divergency cut-out block)과 선속 확산현상을 고려하지 않은 차폐물(straight cut-out block)을 제작하고 선량분포 구간 면적과 조사면 평탄도 및 대칭도를 비교하였다. 결과적으로 선속 확산현상을 고려한 차폐물이 선속 확산현상을 고려하지 않은 차폐물보다 차폐물 두께에 대한 측방산란효과가 현저하게 감소함으로서 기준점 깊이에서 균등한 선량분포를 이루었다. 특히 선속 확산현상을 고려한 차폐물일수록 고 선량 영역이 현저하게 감소하였으며 조사면 경계부에서 균일한 선량분포를 이루었다. 이는 환자의 투여선량의 정확도를 증가시키기 위한 모형 연구로서 전자선의 선량분포 특성을 고려한 방사선치료계획을 수립해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jette D, Walker S: Electron dose calculation using multiple scattering theory; Evaluation of a new model for inhomogeneities, Medical Physics, 19(5), 1241-1254, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596756
  2. Verhaegen F, Symonds Tayler R, Liu HH, Nahum AE: Backscatter towards the monitor ion chamber in high-energy photon and electron beams; charge integration versus Monte Carlo simulation, Physics Medical Biology, 45(11), 3159-3170, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/304
  3. Kahn FM: The physics of radiation therapy, 4th ed., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 264-314, 2009
  4. Klevenhagen SC: Physics of electron beam therapy, Bristol, Adam hilger Ltd., 67-70, 1985
  5. Bethe HA, Ross MA, Smith LP: The multiple scattering of electrons, Proceeding Philos Soc, 78, 573-590, 1938
  6. Jette D: Electron beam dose calculation in radiation therapy physics, 2nd ed., Springer & Verlay, Berlin, 95-121, 1995
  7. Rogers DWO: Monte Carlo techniques in radiotherapy, Physics in Canada, 58, 63-70, 2002
  8. Ma CM, Jiang SB: Monte Carlo modeling of electron beams from medical accelerators, Physics Medical Biology, 44, R157-R189, 1985
  9. Turian JV, Smith BD, Bernard DA, Griem KL, Chu JC: Monte Carlo calculations of output factors for clinically shaped electron fields, Journal Application Clinic Medical Physics, 5(2), 42-63, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.2020.25270
  10. Klein EE, Low DA, Purdy JA: Changes in electron beam dosimetry with a new scattering foil-applicator system on a CL2100C, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 32(2), 483-490, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00452-Q
  11. Choi DR, Wolters J, Mason D, Bailie A: Modified sector-integration method for predicting the output factors of electron beams including extended source to surface distance. Physics Medical Biology, 45(11), 3367-3372, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/318
  12. Choi DR, Mobit PN, Breitman KE: The clinical implementation of a method for calculating the output factor and percent depth dose for an electron beam, Physics Medical Biology, 48(7), 899-908, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/7/307
  13. Faddegon BA, Villarreal-Barajas JE: Final aperture superposition technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves, Medical Physics, 32(11), 3286-94, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2068947
  14. Radiation Oncology Sourcebook, CIVCO Medical Solutions, 75-80, 2006
  15. Khan FM, Higgins PD: Calculation of depth dose and dose per monitor unit for irregularly shaped electron field; and addendum, Physics Medical Biology, 44, N77-N88, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/6/401
  16. Nordic Association of Clinical Physics (NACP): Procedures in external radiation therapy dosimetry with electron and photon beams with maximum energies between 1 and 50MeV, Acta. Radiol., 19, 55, 1980 https://doi.org/10.3109/02841868009130136
  17. Markus B: Beitrage zur Entwicklung der Dosimetric schneller, Elektrnen Strablentberapie, 123, 350, 508, 1964 and 124, 33, 1964
  18. Nusse M: Factors affecting the energy-range relation of fast electron in aluminum, Physics Medical Biology, 14, 315, 1969 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/14/2/008
  19. Harder D, Schulz HJ: Some new physical data for electron beam dosimetry, In: Proceedings of the European Congress of Radiology, Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1997
  20. AAPM: Clinical electron beam dosimetry, TG-25 Report, Medical Physics, 18, 73-109, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596695
  21. ICRU Report No. 35: Radiation dosimetry, electrons beam with energies between 1 and 50 MeV, Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1984
  22. ICRU Report No. 21: Radiation dosimetry, Electrons with intial energy between 1 and 50 MeV, Washington D,C, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 16-21, 1972