DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prevalence and Comparison of Diagnostic Methods for Trichomonas vaginalis Infection in Pregnant Women in Argentina

  • Perazzi, Beatriz E. (Clinical Bacteriology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital de Clinicas, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires) ;
  • Menghi, Claudia I. (Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital de Clinicas, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires) ;
  • Coppolillo, Enrique F. (Lower Genital Tract Clinic, Obstetrics Division, Department of Tocogynecology, Hospital de Clinicas, University Hospital of Buenos Aires) ;
  • Gatta, Claudia (Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital de Clinicas, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires) ;
  • Eliseth, Martha Cora (Lower Genital Tract Clinic, Obstetrics Division, Department of Tocogynecology, Hospital de Clinicas, University Hospital of Buenos Aires) ;
  • De Torres, Ramon A. (Specialization Course in Clinical Bacteriology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires) ;
  • Vay, Carlos A. (Clinical Bacteriology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital de Clinicas, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires) ;
  • Famiglietti, Angela M. R. (Clinical Bacteriology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital de Clinicas, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires)
  • Received : 2009.10.12
  • Accepted : 2010.01.18
  • Published : 2010.03.15

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to conduct a prevalence survey of trichomoniasis in pregnant women and to evaluate the utility of different methods for its diagnosis. A total of 597 vaginal exudates from pregnant women who were examined at the Hospital de Clinicas in Buenos Aires, Argentina from 1 August 2005 to 31 January 2007, were prospectively and consecutively evaluated. The investigation of Trichomonas vaginalis was made by different microscopic examinations, and culture on liquid medium. The sensitivity and specificity of the microscopic examinations were assessed considering culture on liquid medium as the "gold standard". The prevalence of T. vaginalis obtained by culture on liquid medium was 4.0% (24/597). The prevalence of T. vaginalis obtained by direct wet smear, prolonged May-Grunwald Giemsa staining, and sodium acetate-formalin (SAF)/methylene blue staining-fixing technique was 1.8%, 2.3% and 2.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of the direct wet smear was 45.8%, that of the prolonged May-Grunwald Giemsa staining was 58.3%, and that of the SAF/methylene blue method was 62.5%. Considering the 3 microscopic examinations altogether, the sensitivity rose to 66.7% and the specificity was 100% for all of them. This is the first time that the prevalence data of T. vaginalis by culture in pregnant women are published in Argentina. Due to the low sensitivity obtained by microscopy in asymptomatic pregnant women, the use of the liquid medium is recommended during pregnancy, in order to provide an early diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Cotch MF, Pastorek JG, Nugent RP, Hillier SL, Gibbs RS, Martín DH, Eschenbach DA, Edelman R, Carey JC, Regan JA, Krohn MA, Klebanoff MA, Rao AV, Rhoads GG. Trichomonas vaginalis associated with low birth weight and preterm delivery. The vaginal infections and prematurity study group. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24: 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007435-199707000-00008
  2. Minkoff H, Grunebaum AN, Schwarz RH, Feldman J, Cummings MC, Crombleholme W, Clark L, Pringle G, McCormack WM. Risk factors for prematurity and premature rupture of membranes: prospective study of the vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 965-972. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(84)90392-2
  3. Sobel JD. Vaginitis. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1896-1903. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199712253372607
  4. Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Relation of tubal infertility to a history of sexually transmitted disease. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 577-584.
  5. Cates W, Joesoef MR, Goldman MB. Atypical pelvis inflammatory disease: can we identify clinical predictors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 341-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90085-W
  6. Zhang Z-F, Begg CB. Is Trichomonas vaginalis a cause of cervical neoplasia? Results from a combined analysis of 24 studies. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/23.4.682
  7. Swygard H, Sena AC, Hobbs MM, Cohen NS. Trichomoniasis: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80: 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2003.005124
  8. Krieger JN. Trichomoniasis in men: old issues and new data. Sex Transm Dis 1995; 22: 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007435-199503000-00003
  9. McCann JS. Comparison of direct microscopy and culture in the diagnosis of trichomoniasis. Br J Vener Dis 1974; 50: 450-452.
  10. Krieger JN, Tam MR, Stevens CE, Nielsen IO, Hale J, Kiviat NB, Holmes KK. Diagnosis of trichomoniasis. Comparison of conventional wet-mount examination with cytologic studies, cultures and monoclonal antibody staining of direct specimens. JAMA 1988; 259: 1223-1227. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.259.8.1223
  11. Garber GE, Sibau L, Ma R, Proctor EM, Shaw CE, Bowie WR. Cell culture compared with broth for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 1275-1279.
  12. Stary A, Kuchinka-Koch A, Teodorowicz L. Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis on modified Columbia agar in the routine laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3277-3280. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.9.3277-3280.2002
  13. Poch F, Levin D, Levin S, Dan M. Modified thioglycolate medium: a simple and reliable means for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 2630-2631.
  14. Costamagna SR. Trichomonas vaginalis. In Costamagna SR, ed, Parasitosis Regionales, un estudio referido a las principales para-sitosis de Bahia Blanca, provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Bahia Blanca, Argentina. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur. 2004, p 197-217.
  15. Germain M, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Genital flora in pregnancy and its association with intrauterine growth retardation. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 2162-2168.
  16. Blackwell AL, Thomas PD, Wareham K, Emery SJ. Health gains from screening for infection of the lower genital tract in women attending for termination of pregnancy. Lancet 1993; 342: 206-210.
  17. Meis PJ, Goldenberg RL, Mercer B, Moawad A, Das A, McNellis D, Johnson F, Tams JD, Thom E, Andrews WW. The preterm prediction study: significance of vaginal infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1231-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)91360-2
  18. Simoes JA, Giraldo PC, Faundes A. Prevalence of cervicovaginal infections during gestation and accuracy of clinical diagnosis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1998; 6: 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1155/S1064744998000246
  19. Coppolillo EF, Vay C, Menghi C, Cora Eliseht M, Gatta C, Mendez O, de Torres R, Malamud de Rudavega H, Famiglietti A, Perazzi B. Prevalencia de infecciones vaginales en embarazadas sintomaticas y asintomaticas. Rev Enfer Tract Gen Inf 2007; 1: 17-22.
  20. Patel SR, Wiese W, Patel SC, Ohl C, Byrd JC, Estrada CA. Systematic review of diagnostic tests for vaginal trichomoniasis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2000; 8: 248-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-0997(2000)8:5<248::AID-IDOG1028>3.0.CO;2-B
  21. Radonjic IV, Dzamic AM, Mitrovic SM, Arsic Arsenijevic VS, Popadic DM, Kranjcic Zec IF. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection: The sensitivities and specificities of microscopy, culture and PCR assay. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 126: 116-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.033
  22. Spiegel CA. Microflora associated with Trichomonas vaginalis and vaccination against trichomoniasis. In Honigberg BM, ed, Trichomonads Parasitic in Humans. New York, USA. Springer- Verlug. 1990, p 213-224.
  23. Madico G, Quinn TC, Rompalo A, McKee Jr K, Gaydos CA. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection by PCR using vaginal swab samples. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 3205-3210.

Cited by

  1. Trichomonas vaginalis Infection among Pregnant Women in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia vol.2013, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/485439
  2. Codetection of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans by PCR in Urine Samples in a Low-Risk Population Attended in a Clinic First Level in Central Veracruz, Mexico vol.2013, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/281892
  3. Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis in Pregnant Women in Zanjan, Northwest of Iran vol.6, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.7258
  4. Prevalence of Trichomoniasis Among Women in Kermanshah, Iran vol.17, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.23617
  5. Trichomoniasis in Pregnant Sudanese Pregnant Women at Tertiary Obstetric Facility, Khartoum, Sudan vol.6, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2016.69069
  6. Contraception: Influence on Vaginal Microbiota and Identification of Vaginal Lactobacilli Using MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rDNA Sequencing vol.12, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801812010218
  7. Bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis and trichomonal vaginitis among reproductive-aged women seeking primary healthcare in Sana’a city, Yemen vol.19, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4549-3
  8. Actin Gene-Based Molecular Typing of Trichomonas vaginalis Clinical Isolates from the North of Iran vol.65, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-020-00226-x