Extended Proportional Fair Scheduling for Statistical QoS Guarantee in Wireless Networks

  • Lee, Neung-Hyung (DMC R&D Center, Samsung Electronics) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Ghoo (Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Bahk, Sae-Woong (School of Electrical Engineering and INMC, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2008.12.10
  • Accepted : 2010.03.25
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

Opportunistic scheduling provides the capability of resource management in wireless networks by taking advantage of multiuser diversity and by allowing delay variation in delivering data packets. It generally aims to maximize system throughput or guarantee fairness and quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we develop an extended proportional fair (PF) scheduling policy that can statistically guarantee three kinds of QoS. The scheduling policy is derived by solving the optimization problems in an ideal system according to QoS constraints. We prove that the practical version of the scheduling policy is optimal in opportunistic scheduling systems. As each scheduling policy has some parameters, we also consider practical parameter adaptation algorithms that require low implementation complexity and show their convergences mathematically. Through simulations, we confirm that our proposed schedulers show good fairness performance in addition to guaranteeing each user's QoS requirements.

Keywords

References

  1. F. P. Kelly, "Charging and rate control for elastic traffic," Eur. Trans. Telecommun., vol. 8, pp. 33–37, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4460080106
  2. F. P. Kelly, A. Maulloo, and D. Tan, "Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness, and stability," J. Operational Research Soc., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 237–252, 1998.
  3. A. Jalali, R. Padovani, and P. Pankaj, "Data throughput of CDMA-HDR a high efficiency-high data rate personal communication wireless system," in Proc. IEEE VTC, vol. 3, May 2000, pp. 1854–1858.
  4. J. M. Holtzman, "Asymptotic analysis of proportional fair algorithm," in Proc. IEEE PIMRC, vol. 2, 2001, pp. F33–F37.
  5. S. Borst and P. Whiting, "Dynamic rate control algorithms for HDR throughput optimization," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2001, pp. 976–985.
  6. M. Andrews, K. Kumaran, K. Ramanan, A. Stolyar, R. Vijayakumar, and P.Whiting,"CDMA data QoS scheduling on the forward link with variable channel conditions," Bell Lab. Tech. Rep., Apr. 2000.
  7. S. Shakkottai and A. L. Stolyar, "Scheduling algorithms for a mixture of real-time and non-real-time data in HDR," in Proc. International Teletraffic Congress, Sept, 2000, pp. 793–804.
  8. M. Agarwal and A. Puri, "Base station scheduling of requests with fixed deadlines," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2002, pp. 487–496.
  9. D.Wu and R. Negi,"Downlink scheduling in a celluar network for qualityof- service assurance," IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1547– 1557, Sept. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2004.833623
  10. X. Liu, E. K. P. Chong, and N. B. Shroff, "A framework for opportunistic scheduling in wireless networks," Compu. Netw. J., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 451– 474, Mar. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(02)00401-2
  11. M. Xiao, N. B. Shroff, and E. K. P. Chong, "A utility-based power-control scheme in wireless cellular systems," IEEE/ACMTrans. Netw., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 210–221, Apr. 2003.
  12. C. Li, X.Wang, and D. Reynolds, "Utility-based joint power and rate allocation for downlink CDMA with blind multiuser detection," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1163–1174, May 2005.
  13. V. K. N. Lau, "Analytical framework for multiuser uplink MIMO spacetime scheduling design with convex utility functions," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1832–1843, Sept. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2004.834684
  14. V. K. N. Lau, "Optimal downlink space-time scheduling design with convex utility functions-multiple-antenna systems with orthogonal spatial multiplexing," IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1322–1333, July 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2005.851337
  15. H. J. Kushner and P. A. Whiting, "Convergence of proportional-fair sharing algorithms under general conditions," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1250–1259, July 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2004.830826
  16. Z. Jiang, Y. Ge, and Y. G. Li, "Max-utility wireless resource management for best-effort traffic," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 100–111, Jan. 2005.
  17. C. Curescu and S. Nadjm-Tehrani, "Time-aware utility-based resource allocation in wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 624–636, July 2005.
  18. R. Agrawal, A. Bedekar, R. J. La, and V. Subramanian, "Class and channel condition based weighted proportional fair scheduler," in Proc. Teletraffic Engineering in the Internet Era, ITC-17, 2001,pp. 553–565.
  19. R. Agrawal and V. Subramanian, "Optimality of certain channel-aware scheduling policies," in Proc. AACCCC, 2002, pp. 1532–1541.
  20. D. M. Andrews, L. Qian, and A. L. Stolyar, "Optimal utility-based throughput allocation subject to throughput constraints," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2005, pp. 2415–2424.
  21. A. L. Stolyar, "On the asymptotic optimality of the gradient scheduling algorithm for multi-user throughput allocation," Operations Research. no. 53, pp. 12–25, 2005
  22. P. Viswananth, D. Tse, and R. Laroia, "Opportunistic beamforming using dumb antennas," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1277–1294, June. 2002.
  23. H. Kushner and G. Yin, Stochastic Approximation Algorithms and Applications, Springer, New York, 1997.
  24. T. E. Kolding, "QoS-aware proportional fair packet scheduling with required activity detection," in Proc. IEEE VTC, Sept. 2006.