DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean College Students' Purchase Intention of Foreign Jeans Brands -Applying an Integrated Behavioral Intention Model-

통합적 행동의도모델 적용에 의한 국내 대학생 소비자의 해외 진 브랜드 구매의도 분석

  • Kang, Ji-Hye (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jin, Byoung-Ho (Dept. of Consumer, Apparel & Retail Studies, University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
  • Received : 2010.06.10
  • Accepted : 2010.08.06
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

The Korean jean market has become increasingly competitive due to the increased imports of global brands. This study is to understand the purchase behaviors of Korean college students toward foreign brand jeans to help Korean jean brands enhance their competitive advantages over foreign brand jeans in the Korean market. Considering perceptions of Korean consumers toward foreign brands and traditional value changes, this study proposed a research model incorporating two extended behavioral intention (BI) models, Lee's modified BI model and Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. To test the research model, a total of 240 valid data sets were collected from college students in Busan, Korea. Structural and measurement models were estimated using LISREL 8.80. Because face saving failed to attain internal validity, the research model was revised to eliminate face saving. The findings indicated that perceived behavioral control had the strongest direct influence on purchase intentions of Korean college students for foreign brand jeans. Group conformity and subjective norm had non-significant direct impacts on purchase intention, whereas group conformity had an indirect impact on purchase intention through attitude. Based on the findings, theoretical and managerial implications were provided.

Keywords

References

  1. 고애란. (1994). 국내 및 외국 상표 청바지의 구매의도에 따른 평가기준에 대한 신념, 추구이미지 및 의복 태도의 차이 연구. 한국의류학회지, 18(2), 263-272.
  2. 김명소, 한영석 . (2001). 합리적 행위이론과 계획된 행동이론에 의한 온라인 구매행동 이해. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(3), 17-32.
  3. 김미영. (2009, 4. 23). '광부의 옷'에서 부와 패션의 상징으로. 한겨레 21. 757. 자료검색일 2010, 6. 1, 자료출처 http://h21.hani.co.kr/arti/culture/culture _general/24825.html
  4. 김연희, 김미진, 이영미, 이규혜. (2007). 다중원산지와 가격 정보가 청바지 상표 태도와 제품 평가에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 31(4), 495-506
  5. 김연희, 이규혜. (2009). 원산지 일치도와 가격수준에 따른 의류 제품 평가-소비자 성별의 조절효과를 중심으로-. 복식, 59(6) , 41-57.
  6. 김재휘, 김태훈, 전진안. (2008). 체면이 비계획적 상향 소비에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자. 광고, 9(2), 149-168.
  7. 김진희, 임숙자, 이숙희. (2004). 원산지와 가격이 티셔츠의 제품 평가에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 28(6), 723-733.
  8. 나은영. (1995). 의식개혁에 장애가 되는 문화적 요인들: 체면과 동조. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 2(1), 33-51.
  9. 박시한, 한미정. (2007). 계획된 행동이론을 적용한 온라인 콘텐츠 이용행동의 이해: 대학생 집단을 중심으로. 홍보학연구, 11/12, 195-230.
  10. 박정원, 이인자. (1998). 수입 의류와 국내 의류의 구매의도에 영향을 주는 요인-Fishbein 과 Ajzen의 행동의도모델을 중심으로-. 복식, 40, 109-119.
  11. 박희봉, 이회창, 전지용. (2008). 한.중.일 3국의 가치변화 성향 분석-신세대와 기성세대 간 비교-. 한국행정논집, 20(2), 501-669.
  12. 배병관. (2009, 12). 09/10 Best of Brands: Casual. 패션비즈, pp. 158-159.
  13. 이성훈. (2006, 3). 진마켓 뜨겁다. 패션비즈, pp. 124-125.
  14. 이자연. (2006, 3. 16). 내 몸에 꼭 맞는 청바지 찾았다. 조선일보. 자료검색일 2009, 11. 10, 자료출처 http://www.chosun.com/culture/news/200603/200603150412.html
  15. 이지원, 나수임. (2006). 패션 브랜드 자산가치의 구성요인에 관한 연구-진 브랜드를 중심으로-. 한국패션비즈니즈학회, 10(2), 117-146.
  16. 임희섭. (1994). 한국의 사회변동과 가치관. 서울: 나남출판.
  17. 서정희, 이승희. (2001). 한국과 일본 대학생의 소비자 가치 유형과 구매충동차원에 관한 비교문화연구. 광고연구, 51, 71-93
  18. 장은숙. (2007, 8. 6). 프리미엄 진으로 섹시하게. 시사저널, 929. 자료검색일 2010, 5. 25, 자료출처 http://www.sisapress.com/news/article View.html?idxno=43949#
  19. 조대우, 황경연. (2001). 인터넷뱅킹에 영향을 미치는 요인-계획된 행동이론을 중심으로-. 경영학연구, 30(4), 1225-1245.
  20. 전경숙, Jai-Ok Kim. (1996). 미국산 청바지에 대한 소비자 태도의 비교문화 분석-한국과 멕시코의 남녀소비자를 대상으로-. 한국의류학회지, 20(3), 493-501.
  21. 정명선, 김혜진. (2009). 체면 민감성, 과시 소비성향, 패션 명품 선호도가 패션 명품 복제품의 구매행동에 미치는 영향. 복식문화연구, 17(2), 189-202.
  22. 청바지, 평등의 상징 '이젠 옛말'. (2004, 3. 11). 주간동아. 자료검색일 2010, 6. 2, 자료출처 http://weekly.donga.com/docs/magazine/weekly/2004/03/11/200403110500037/200403110500037_1.html
  23. 천문선, 이수경, 고애란. (2006). 문화성향이 의복 소비 행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자광고, 7(2), 277-300.
  24. 최일경, 고애란. (1995). 혜택세분화와 인식도에 의한 진의류 브랜드 이미지 연구(II)-인식도에 의한 브랜드 이미지 분석-. 한국의류학회지, 19(5), 699-712.
  25. 최자영, 김경자. (2003). 계획적 행동이론을 적용한 소비자들의 온라인쇼핑행동 연구. 소비자학연구, 14(4), 89-103.
  26. 09/10 Fashion Market Now. (2009, 10). 패션비즈, pp. 188-189.
  27. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  28. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  29. Chan, R. Y-K., & Lau, L. (1998). A test of the Fishbein-Ajzen behavioral intentions model under Chinese cultural settings: Are there any differences between PRC and Hong Kong consumers. Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, 4(3), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004490
  30. Chung, J-E., & Pysarchik, D. T. (2000). A model of behavioral intention to buy domestic versus imported products in a Confucian culture. Marketing Intelligence & Planing, 18(5), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500010343982
  31. Eckman, M., Darnhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process. Consumer use of criteria for evaluation women's apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800202
  32. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, l. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  33. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  34. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L.., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  35. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  36. Jin, B., & Kang, J. H. (2008, November). The purchase lntentions of Chinese consumers toward a U.S. apparel brand: A test of a composite behavior intention model. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Textile and Apparel Association, Schaumburg, IL.
  37. Jin, B., & Kang, J. H. (2010). Face or subjective norm? Chinese coIIege students' purchase behaviors toward foreign brand jeans. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28(3), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X09353083
  38. Kang, H., Hahn, M., Fortin, D. R., Hyun, Y. J., & Eom, Y. (2006). Effects of perceived behavioral control on the consumer usage intention of e-coupons. Psychology & Marketing, 23(10), 841-864. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20136
  39. Lee, C. (1990). Modifying an American consumer behavior model for consumers in Confucian culture: The case of Fishbein behavioral intention model. Journal of Inlernational Consumer Marketing, 3(1), 27-50.
  40. Malhotra, N. K., & McCort, J. D. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of behavioral intention models: Theoretical consideration and an empirical investigation. International Marketing Review, 18(3), 235-269.
  41. Park, H.-J., & Dickerson, K. G (2002). Attitude, subjective norms and behavioral intentions toward purchasing imported casual clothing. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 26(12), 1791-1803.
  42. Shen, D., Dìckson, M. A., Lennon, S., Montalto, C., & Zhang, L. (2003). Cultural influences on Chinese consumers' intentions to purchase apparel: Test and extension of the Fishbein behavioral intentional model. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 21(2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0302100204
  43. Shim, S., Eastlick, M. A., Lotz, S. L., & Warrington, P. (2001). An online purchase intentions model: The role of intention to search. Journal of Retailing, 77(3), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00051-3
  44. Shimp, T. A., & Kavas, A. (1984). The theorγ of reasoned action applied to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 795-810. https://doi.org/10.1086/209015

Cited by

  1. Relationships among Mobile Fashion Shopping Characteristics, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Enjoyment, and Purchase Intention - Mediating Effect of Ease of Use - vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.2.161