A sero-surveillance of Brucella spp. antibodies and individual risk factors of infection in cattle in Bangladesh

  • Ahasan, Shamim (Department of Medicine, Surgery and Obstetrics, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University) ;
  • Rahman, Siddiqur (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Song, Hee-Jong (Korea Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2010.05.17
  • Accepted : 2010.06.18
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Brucellosis is a serious zoonosis, recognized worldwide. It primarily affects animals, which act as reservoirs for human infection as well as being of economic significance to the agri-food industry. Bangladesh has been reported as an endemic area for brucellosis. So a cross sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence and potential risk factors of brucellosis in cattle in Dinajpur and Mymensingh districts of Bangladesh. A total of 182 cattle were examined by Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) between September 2008 and October 2009. Then Positive, doubtful, and negative samples were further confirmed with slow agglutination test (SAT) and both indirect and competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA and cELISA). A questionnaire was used to collect epidemiological information of the animals. The overall animal-level prevalence was 3.30%. Brucellosis seroprevalence was higher (4.76% by cELISA) in cattle above 48 months than those under 48 months. Female showed higher seroprevalence (10.67%) than male (6.25%). Higher seroprevalence was also found in cattle bred naturally (20.0%) than artificially (8.77%) and cattle that aborted or with previous abortion record (22.22%) showed higher seroprevalence than non-aborted (7.69%). The sensitivity of RBT and SAT was found 100% as compared to cELISA standard test, whereas specificity of RBT (95.35%) was higher than that of SAT (94.32%).

Keywords

References

  1. AI-Ani FK, EI-Qaderi S, Hailat NQ, Razziq R, AI-Darraji AM. 2004.Human and animal brucellosis in Jordan between 1996 and 1998: a study. In Emerging zoonoses and pathogens of public health concern (King KJ, ed.) Rev Sci Tech. Off Int Epiz 23(2): 831-840.
  2. AI-Sous MW, Bohlega S, AI-Kawi MZ, Alwatban J, McLean DR. 2004. Neurobrucellosis: clinical and neuroimaging correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(3): 395-401.
  3. Amin KMR, Rahman MB, Kabir SML, Sarkar SK, Akand MSI. 2004. Serological epidemiology of brucellosis in cattle of Mymensingh districts of Bangladesh. J Animal Vet Adv 3(11): 773-775.
  4. Amin KMR. 2003. Serological epidemiology of bovine and caprine brucellosis. MS thesis. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.
  5. Aulakh HK, Patil PK, Sharma S, Kumar H, Mahajan V, Sandhu KS. 2008. A study on the epidemiology of bovine brucellosis in Punjab (India) using Milk-ELISA. Acta Vet Brno 77: 393-399. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200877030393
  6. Baek BK, Lim CW, Rahman MS, Kim CH, Oluoch A, Kakoma I. 2003. Brucella abortus infection in indigenous Korean dogs. Can J Vet Res 67(4): 312-314.
  7. Blasco JM, Garin-Bastuji B, Marin CM, Gerbier G, Fanlo J, Jimenez de Bagues MP, Cau C. 1994. Efficacy of different Rose Bengal and complement fixation antigens for the diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in sheep and goats. Vet Rec 134(16): 415-420. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.134.16.415
  8. Crawford RP, Huber JD, Adams BS. 1990. Epidemiology and surveillance, In Animal brucellosis FL: 131-151.
  9. Domingo AM. 2000. Current status of some zoonoses in Togo. Acta Tropica 76(1): 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00092-9
  10. England T, Kelly L, Jones RD, MacMillan A, Wooldridge M. 2000. A simulation model of brucellosis spread in British cattle under several testing regimes. Prev Vet Med 63(1-2): 63-73.
  11. Franco MP, Mulder M, Gilman RH, Smits HL. 2007. Human brucellosis, Review. Lancet Infect Dis 7(12): 775-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70286-4
  12. Garcia Carrillo C. 1990. Animal and human brucellosis in the Americas. OlE, Paris: 287.
  13. Garin B, Trap D, Gaumont R. 1985. Assessment of the EDTA seroagglutination test for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Vet Rec 117(17): 444-445. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.117.17.444
  14. Godfroid J, Kasbohrer A. 2002. Brucellosis in the European Union and Norway at the turn of the twenty-first century. Vet Microbiol 90(1-4): 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00217-1
  15. Hugh-Jones ME. 2000. Zoonoses, recognition, control and prevention. 1st Ed., Edited by Hugh-Jones ME, Hubbert WT, Hagstad HV. Iowa State Press, A Blackwell Publishing Company.
  16. Kakoma I, Oluoch AO, Baek BK, Rahman MS, Matsuda K. 2003. More attention warranted on Brucella abortus in animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 222(3): 284.
  17. Kubuafor DK, Awumbila B, Akanmori BD. 2000. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle and humans in Akwapim- South district of Ghana: public health implications. Acta Tropica 76: 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00088-7
  18. MacMillan A. 1990. Conventional serological test, in Animal Brucellosis. Boca Ratan CRC Press, Florida, USA.
  19. Mia AS, Islam H. 1967. A preliminary study on the incidence of bovine infertility and economic loss caused by it. Pakistan Vet J 12: 12-15.
  20. Nicoletti P. 1990. Vaccination. In: Nielsen K, Duncan JR (eds.). Animal Brucellosis. Boca Raton, CRC Press: 283-300.
  21. OlE. 2000. OlE manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines, 4th edn., 12 rue de Prony, 75017 Paris, France.
  22. Orduna A, Almaraz A, Prado A, Gutierrez MP, Garcia-Pascual A, Duenas A, Cuervo M, Abad R, Hernandez B, Lorenzo B, Bratos MA, Torres AR. 2000. Evaluation of an immunocapture-agglutination test (Brucellacapt) for serodiagnosis of human brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 38(11): 4000-4005.
  23. Prahlad K, Singh DK, Barbuddhe SB, Kumar P. 1997. Serological evidence of brucellosis in sheep and goats. Ind J Anim Sci 67(3): 180
  24. Radostits OM. 2000. Veterinary Medicine, 9 eds, In: Radostits OM, Gay CC, Blood DC , Hinchcliff KW. W.B. Saunders Company Ltd: 871-882.
  25. Rahman MS, JM, Song HJ. 2008. Prevalence of brucellosis and its association with reproductive problems in goats in Bangladesh. Korean J Vet Serv 31(3): 433-438.
  26. Rahman MS, Han JC, Park J, Lee JH, Eo SK, Chae JS. 2006. Prevalence of brucellosis and itsproblemscows Bangladesh. Vet Rec 159 (8): 180-182.
  27. Rahman MS. 2003. Experimental infection and protective immunity of Sprague-Dawley rats with Brucella abortus. Ph. D. thesis, submitted to the Department of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Chonbuk National University, Republic of Korea.
  28. Rahman MM, Chowdhury TIAF, Chowdhury MUA. 1978. Investigation of brucellosis among cattle. Bangladesh Vet J 12: 12
  29. Rahman MS, Han JC, Park JH, Lee JH, Eo SK, Chae JS. 2006. Prevalence of brucellosis and its association with reproductive problems in cows in Bangladesh. Vet Rec 159: 180-182. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.159.6.180
  30. Roth F, Zinsstag J, Orkhon D, Chimed-Ochir G, Hutton G, Cosivi O, Carrin G, Otte J. 2003. Human health benefits from livestock vaccination for brucellosis: case study. Bull World Health Organ 81(12): 867-876.
  31. Salman MD, Meyer ME. 1984. Epidemiology of bovine brucellosis in the Mexicali Valley, Mexico: literature review of disease-associated factors. Am J Vet Res 45(8): 1557-1560.
  32. Sarumathi C, Reddy TV, Sreedevi B. 2003. Serological survey of bovine brucellosis in Andhra Pradesh. Ind J Dairy Sci 56: 408-410.
  33. Sharma RK, Arun-Kumcr, ThapliyaJ DC, Singh SP. 2003. Seroepidemiology of brucellosis in bovines. Ind J Anim Sci 73: 1235-1237.
  34. Siriwardane JADS. 1987. Bovine brucellosis and brucellosis of small ruminants. Technical Series Office of International des Epizootics 6: 169-172.
  35. WHO. 2006. Brucellosis in human and animals. Joint report of WHO, FAO and OIE. WHO press, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
  36. Wright PF, Nilsson E, Van Rooij EM, Lelenta M, Jeggo MH. 1993. Standardisation and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbentassay techniques for the detection of antibody in infectious disease diagnosis. Rev Sci Tech 12(2): 435-450.