DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Template therapy for mouth opening limitation by temporomandibular joint disorders

턱관절원판 전방 변위로 인한 개구 장애의 템플레이트 치료

  • Lee, Gi-Cheol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Woo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Pyo, Sung-Woon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 이기철 (순천향대학교 부천병원 치과 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 신승우 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 표성운 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과)
  • Received : 2010.04.19
  • Accepted : 2010.06.30
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

Introduction: Limited mouth opening is a representative clinical symptom of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDWOR). Various treatment methods have been proposed for patients with ADDWOR. This study examined the clinical effectiveness of template therapy for patients with mouth opening difficulty due to the ADDWOR. Material and Methods: A total of 14 patients (female 12, male 2, average age: $29.1{\pm}14.4$), who had been treated in the template clinic, Sooncheonhyang University Bucheon Hospital, from January of 2006 to December of 2008, were enrolled in this study. The subjects were selected according to the following criteria: more than 2 weeks after the onset of locking, mouth opening range <35 mm, and confirmed ADDWOR without a synovial pathology by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients were treated with the template appliance, instructed to wear it while sleeping and exercise for at least 10 hours per day. The maximum mouth opening (MMO) range and pain recognition scores before and after template therapy were recorded and compared. A paired t-test and Wilcoxon's signed rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results: After the periodical follow up, significant improvement in the opening range was observed in the template treatment group. The average MMO range before treatment was $30.2{\pm}3.5mm$ and the average MMO after treatment and follow up was $47.1{\pm}4.7mm$. The mean amount of mouth opening increment was $16.9{\pm}5.4mm$ (P<0.01) and the pain recognition scores before and after treatment was also improved.(P=0.001) Conclusion: The template appliance proved to be efficient for the treatment of TMD with a closed lock and painful joint due to ADDWOR.

Keywords

References

  1. Japanese Society for Temporomandibular Joint, ed. Temporo-mandibular joints. Seoul: Narae Publishing; 2004.
  2. Chung SC, Kim YK. Orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders. 2nd ed. Seoul: Shinhung Co.; 2006.
  3. Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:1163-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90409-F
  4. Park YH, Lee SH, Yoon HJ. An effect of combination with arthrocentesis and stabilization splint treatment on temporomandibular joint disorder patients. J Korean Assoc Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;32:32-6.
  5. Murakami K, Hosaka H, Moriya Y, Segami N, Iizuka T. Shortterm treatment outcome study for the management of temporomandibular joint closed lock. A comparison of arthrocentesis to nonsurgical therapy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:253-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80379-8
  6. Okeson JP. Long-term treatment of disk-interference disorders of the temporomandibular joint with anterior repositioning occlusal splints. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:611-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90224-7
  7. Kirk WS Jr, Calabrese DK. Clinical evaluation of physical therapy in the management of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:113-9.
  8. Chung SC, Kim HS. The effect of the stabilization splint on the TMJ closed lock. Cranio 1993;11:95-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1993.11677949
  9. Holmlund AB. Surgery for TMJ internal derangement. Evaluation of treatment outcome and criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22:75-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80806-9
  10. Murakami KI, Iizuka T, Matsuki M, Ono T. Recapturing the persistent anteriorly displaced disk by mandibular manipulation after pumping and hydraulic pressure to the upper cavity of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio 1987;5:17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1987.11678169
  11. Fridrich KL, Wise JM, Zeitler DL. Prospective comparison of arthroscopy and arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:816-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90526-1
  12. Sanroman JF. Closed lock (MRI fixed disc): a comparison of arthrocentesis and arthroscopy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33:344-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.005
  13. Barkin S, Weinberg S. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: the role of arthroscopic surgery and arthrocentesis. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:199-203.
  14. Guthrie PB. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis versus arthroscopy. Aust Dent J 2000;45:63.
  15. Frost DE, Kendell BD, Owsley T. Clinical results of arthrocentesis in 40 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:340.
  16. Hosaka H, Murakami K, Goto K, Iizuka T. Outcome of arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint with closed lock at 3 years follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:501-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80193-4
  17. Guzay CM. Introduction to the quadrant theorem, Basal Facts 1976;1:153-60.
  18. Maehara K, Sato S, Takada F, Ito H, Matsui T, Ueda T, et al. A template therapy approach for non-specific complaints. Basal Facts 1986;8:22-35.
  19. Guzay CM. Quadrant theorem: a viewable biophysical analysis of prosthodontia, orthodontia, and TMJ disorders. Chicago: D.D.S. Publications; 1979.
  20. Guzay CM. Quadrant theorem, part 2. Basal Facts 1977;2:19-33.