On the actual coverage probability of binomial parameter

이항모수의 신뢰구간추정량에 대한 실제포함확률에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Dae-Hak (School of Liberal Arts, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 김대학 (대구가톨릭대학교 인성교양부)
  • Received : 2010.05.20
  • Accepted : 2010.06.10
  • Published : 2010.07.31

Abstract

In this paper, various methods for finding confidence intervals for the p of binomial parameter are reviewed. We compare the performance of several confidence interval estimates in terms of actual coverage probability by small sample Monte Carlo simulation.

본 연구는 이항분포의 성공의 확률에 대한 신뢰구간추정량들을 비교분석하고자 한다. 일반적으로 대표본의 경우에 적용되는 잘 알려진 신뢰구간추정량과 소표본의 경우에도 적용될 수 있는 정확신뢰구간, 그리고 포아송 분포를 이용하여 구한 신뢰구간추정량과 연속성의 수정을 고려한 추정량들을 소 표본의 모의실험을 통하여 실제포함확률의 측면에서 비교하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Agresti, A. and Coull, B. A. (1998). Approximate is better than exact for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician, 52, 119-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685469
  2. Blyth, C. R. and Still, H. A. (1983). Binomial confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 108-116. https://doi.org/10.2307/2287116
  3. Blyth, C. R. (1986). Approximate binomial confidence limits. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 843-855. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289018
  4. Chen, H. (1990). The accuracy of approximate intervals for a binomial parameter. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 514-518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289792
  5. Clopper, C. J. and Pearson, E. S. (1934). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26, 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/26.4.404
  6. Hald, A. (1952). Statistical theory with engineering applications, John Wiley, New York.
  7. Leemis, L. M. and Trivedi, K. S. (1996). A comparison of approximate interval estimators for the Bernoulli parameter. The American Statistician, 50, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685046
  8. Wilson, E. B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22, 209-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/2276774