한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구 (Research in Mathematical Education)

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.99-114
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1226-6191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9943(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지

The "Third Wave": Values associated with Effective Learning of Mathematics in Australian Primary Classrooms

  • 투고 : 2010.03.15
  • 심사 : 2010.06.29
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The study reported here is the Australian component of an international research project which seeks to identify student-reported convictions co-valued by them and their teachers during moments of effective mathematics learning. The 2 teachers and their 12 students in the 2 primary school classes associated effective moments of learning with 13 different values. No gender difference was apparent. Although the teachers planned their lessons together and were teaching similar topics, there were differences in what were co-valued. Of the 13 values, examples, sharing, resources, and multi modal representations were found to be commonly valued by students across the 'ability' groups, while the others related to particular 'ability' groups only.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anthony, G. & Walshaw, M. (2008). Characteristics of effective pedagogy for mathematics education. In: H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W. T. Seah & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2004-2007 (pp. 195-222). Rotterdam. Netherlands: Sense Publishers. ME 2010a.00148
  2. Askew, M.; Brown, M.; Rhodes, V.; Johnson, D. & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. Report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency 1995-96. Final report. London: King's College. ME 2000b.00890
  3. Australia Department of Education Science and Training (DEST) (2004). Whats 'making the difference'?: Achieving outstanding numeracy learning outcomes in NSW primary schools Main report. Canberra, Australia: Australia DEST. Electronic version available from: http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/0IE6E9DO-B699-4ED3-9482- 182A2B081ABB/2642/nsw _numeracy_outcomes -primary_schools main.pdf
  4. Bishop, A. J. (1996). How should mathematics teaching in modern societies relate to cultural values-some preliminary questions. Paper presented at the Seventh Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education (SEACME 7), held at Hanoi University of Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam; June 3-7.
  5. Bishop, A. J. (1999). Mathematics teaching and values education: An intersection in need of research. ZDM, Zentralbl. Didakt. Math. 31(1), 1-4. ME 1999b.00768 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-999-0001-2
  6. Brooks, M. (2004). Drawing: The social construction of knowledge. Australian Journal of Early Childhood 29(2), 41-49. ERIC EJ851694
  7. Bryan, C. A.; Wang, T.; Perry, B.; Wong, N. Y. & Cai, J. (2007). Comparison and contrast: Similarities and differences of teachers' views of effective mathematics teaching and learning from four regions. ZDM, Zentralbl. Didakt. Math. 39(4),329-340. ME 2009e.00148 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0035-2
  8. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
  9. Hollingsworth, H.; Lokan, J. & McCrae, B. (2003). Teaching mathematics in Australia: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Victoria, Australia: ACER.
  10. Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 46, 87-113. ME 2002c.01920 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014031004832
  11. Lim, C. S. (2010). Using NVivo 8 to explore photo-voice. In: J. Lim (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computer-Aided Qualitative Research Asia (pp. 48-59). The Netherlands: Merlien Institute.
  12. Linchevski, L. & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you're learning, and I'll tell you how much you've learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. J. Res. Math. Educ. 29(5), 533-554. ME 1999c.01606 https://doi.org/10.2307/749732
  13. Opdenakker, M.-C. & van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher Characteristics and Teaching Styles as Effectiveness Enhancing Factors of Classroom Practice. Teaching and Teacher Education 22, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.008
  14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  15. Seah, W. T. (2005). The negotiation of perceived value differences by immigrant teachers of mathematics in Australia. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Monash University.
  16. Seah, W. T. & Ho, S. Y. (2009). Values operating in effective mathematics lessons in Australia and Singapore: Reflections of pre-service teachers. In: M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 57-64). Thessaloniki, Greece: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
  17. Seah, W. T. & Kalogeropoulos, P. (2006). Teachers of effective mathematics lessons: What gets valued in their practice? In: J. Ocean, C. Walta, M. Breed, J. Virgona & J. Horwood (Eds.), Mathematics: The way forward (pp. 279-287). Melbourne, Australia: MAV.
  18. Shimizu, Y. (2009). Exploring the co-constructed nature of a 'good' mathematics lesson from the eyes of learners. In: M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 73-80). Thessaloniki, Greece: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
  19. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A bestevidence synthesis. Rev. Educ. Res. 57(3), 293-336. ME 1988i.03374
  20. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.