Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • 제32권4호
  • /
  • Pages.313-323
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
대한악안면성형재건외과학회 (Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지

흰쥐 두개골 결손부에서 베타-트리칼슘 인산염과 탈단백우골의 골형성 효과

The Effect of $\beta$-Tricalcium Phosphate and Deproteinized Bovine Bone on Bone Formation in the Defects of Rat Calvaria

  • 정승곤 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 박홍주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 유선열 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소)
  • Jung, Seung-Gon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Ryu, Sun-Youl (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.05.31
  • 심사 : 2010.06.30
  • 발행 : 2010.07.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb$^{(R)}$, Germany) and deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss$^{(R)}$, Switzerland) grafted to the defect of rat calvaria artificially created and the effect of use of absorbable membrane (BioMesh$^{(R)}$, Korea) on new bone formation. Materials and Methods: Transosseous circular calvarial defects with diameters of 5 mm were prepared in the both parietal bone of 30 rats. In the control group I, no specific treatment was done on the defects. In the control group II, the defects were covered with absorbable membrane. In the experimental group I, deproteinized bovine bone was grafted without absorbable membrane; in the experimental group II, deproteinized bovine bone was grafted with absorbable membrane; in the experimental group III, beta-tricalcium phosphate was grafted without absorbable membrane; in the experimental group IV, beta-tricalcium phosphate was grafted with absorbable membrane. The animals were sacrificed after 3 weeks and 6 weeks respectively, and histologic and histomorphometric evaluations were performed. Results: Compare to the control groups, the experimental groups showed more newly formed bone. Between the experimental groups, beta-tricalcium phosphate showed more resorption than deproteinized bovine bone. Stabilization of grafted material and interception of the soft tissue invasion was observed in the specimen treated with membrane. There was no statistical difference between the experimental group I, III and experimental group II, IV classified by graft material, but statistically significant increase in the amount of newly formed bone was observed in the experimental group I, II and II, IV classified by the use of membrane (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both beta-tricalcium phosphate and deproteinized bovine bone showed similar osteoconductibility, but beta-tricalcium phosphate is thought to be closer to ideal synthetic graft material because it showed higher resorption rate in vivo. Increased new bone formation can be expected in bone graft with use of membrane.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Solon TK, Daniel DS : A Review of Bone Substitutes. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 19 : 513, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2007.06.002
  2. Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjorting-Hansen E et al : Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 17 : 237, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01257.x
  3. Garg AK : Bone Biology, Harvesting, and Grafting For Dental Implants: Rationale and Clinical Applications. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., 2004, p.22.
  4. Block MS, Kent JN : Sinus augmentation for dental implants: The use of autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 : 1281, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90185-3
  5. Spector M : Anorganic bovine bone and ceramic analogs of bone mineral as implants to facilitate bone regeneration. Clin Plast Surg 21 : 437, 1994.
  6. Schlegel AK, Donath K : Bio-Oss$^{\circledR}$ - a resorbable bone substitute J Long Term Eff Med Implants 8 : 201, 1998.
  7. Berglundh T, Lindhe J : Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss$^{\circledR}$;. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 8 : 117, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080206.x
  8. Klinge Bn, Alberius P, Isaksson S et al : Osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxylapatite ceramic in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 : 241, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90320-Y
  9. Skoglund A, Hising P, Young C : A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12 : 194, 1997.
  10. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G et al : Maxillary Sinus Augmentation With Different Biomaterials: A Comparative Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in Man. Implant Dent 15 : 197, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000220120.54308.f3
  11. Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI : Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ Journal of Surgery 71 : 354, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x
  12. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E : Bone substitutes: An update. Injury 36 : S20, 2005.
  13. Kokubo T : Design of bioactive bone substitutes based on biomineralization process. Mater Sci Eng C 25 : 97, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2005.01.002
  14. Chow LC, Markovic M, Takagi S : A dual constant-composition titration system as an in vitro resorption model for comparing dissolution rates of calcium phosphate biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 65B : 245, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.10009
  15. Trisi P, Rao W, Rebaudi A et al : Histologic effect of purephase beta-tricalcium phosphate on bone regeneration in human artificial jawbone defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 23 : 69, 2003.
  16. Caffesse RG, Nasjleti CE, Morrison EC et al : Guided tissue regeneration: comparison of bioabsorbable and nonbioabsorbable membranes. Histologic and histometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 65 : 583, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.6.583
  17. Dahlin C, Alberius P, Linde A : Osteopromotion for cranioplasty. An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique. J Neurosurg 74 : 487, 1991. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.3.0487
  18. Suzuki T, Hukkanen M, Ohashi R et al : Growth and adhesion of osteoblast-like cells derived from neonatal rat calvaria on calcium phosphate ceramics. J Biosci Bioeng 89 : 18, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(00)88045-7
  19. Rosen VB, Hobbs LW, Spector M : The ultrastructure of anorganic bovine bone and selected synthetic hyroxyapatites used as bone graft substitute materials. Biomaterials 23 : 921, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00204-6
  20. Gaasbeek RD, Toonen HG, van Heerwaarden RJ et al : Mechanism of bone incorporation of beta-TCP bone substitute in open wedge tibial osteotomy in patients. Biomaterials 26 : 6713-6719, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.056
  21. Steffen T, Stoll T, Arvinte T et al : Porous tricalcium phosphate and transforming growth factor used for anterior spine surgery. Eur Spine J 10 Suppl 2 : S132, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100325
  22. LeGeros RZP : Properties of Osteoconductive Biomaterials: Calcium Phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395 : 81, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200202000-00009
  23. Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO : The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205 : 299, 1986.
  24. Schmitz JP, Schwartz Z, Hollinger JO et al : Characterization of rat calvarial nonunion defects. Acta Anat (Basel) 138 : 185, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1159/000146937
  25. Furlaneto FiAC, Nagata MJH, Fucini SE et al : Bone healing in critical-size defects treated with bioactive glass/calcium sulfate: a histologic and histometric study in rat calvaria. Clin Oral Implants Res 18 : 311, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01331.x
  26. Horch HH, Sader R, Pautke C et al : Synthetic, purephase beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic granules (Cerasorb$^{\circledR}$;) for bone regeneration in the reconstructive surgery of the jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35 : 708, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.017
  27. Wiltfang J, Schlegel KA, Schultze-Mosgau S et al : Sinus floor augmentation with & $\beta$-tricalciumphosphate ($\beta$-TCP): does platelet-rich plasma promote its osseous integration and degradation, Clin Oral Implants Res 14 : 213, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140212.x
  28. Suba Z, Takacs D, Gyulai-Gaal S et al : Facilitation of beta-tricalcium phosphate-induced alveolar bone regeneration by platelet-rich plasma in beagle dogs: a histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 : 832, 2004.
  29. Taylor JC, Cuff SE, Leger JP et al : In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 321, 2002.
  30. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP et al : Alveolar ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss: a histologic study in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 21 : 288, 2001.
  31. Stavropoulos A, Kostopoulos L, Nyengaard JR et al : Fate of bone formed by guided tissue regeneration with or without grafting of Bio-Oss or Biogran. An experimental study in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 31 : 30, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00434.x
  32. Boever ALD, Boever JAD : Guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants in narrow alveolar ridges: a prospective long-term clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 : 549, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01154.x
  33. Zaffe D, Leghissa GC, Pradelli J et al : Histological study on sinus lift grafting by Fisiograft and Bio-Oss$^{\circledR}$;. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16 : 789, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-3574-5
  34. Tamimi FM, Torres J, Tresguerres I et al : Bone augmentation in rabbit calvariae: comparative study between Bio- Oss$^{\circledR}$; and a novel beta-TCP/DCPD granulate. J Clin Periodontol 33 : 922, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01004.x
  35. Nyman S, Lang NP, Buser D et al : Bone regeneration adjacent to titanium dental implants using guided tissue regeneration: a report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 9, 1990.
  36. Karring T, Nyman S, Gottlow J et al : Development of the biological concept of guided tissue regeneration--animal and human studies. Periodontol 2000 1 : 26, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00204.x
  37. Vuddhakanok S, Solt CW, Mitchell JC et al : Histologic evaluation of periodontal attachment apparatus following the insertion of a biodegradable copolymer barrier in humans. J Periodontol 64 : 202, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.3.202
  38. Park YJ, Choi GH, Jang JR et al : The effect of resorbable membrane on bone regeneration in cavarial defects of rats. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 31 : 365, 2009.