DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Stakeholder Analysis for Understanding Barriers to Resource Sharing

대학도서관의 자원공유의 장벽에 대한 이해관계자 분석

  • 심원식 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2010.05.11
  • Accepted : 2010.06.25
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

There is a recognition that traditional resource sharing methods such as interlibrary lending and document delivery are now inadequate to meet user needs in the increasingly networked environment. The current study identifies barriers to resource sharing and provides analysis of stakeholders engaged in resource sharing. Focused interviews with six professional librarians were also carried out to seek out deeper understanding of perceptions of barriers among librarians. Results show that the size of the library was not necessarily result in active resource sharing. There was a wide gap among librarians in terms of their attitudinal and organizational orientations towards resource sharing. Barriers specifically identified in the study include the narrowly defined notion among librarians of what constitutes research and the untested fear of swamping where there is an imbalance of collections. Overall, while resource sharing is recognized as an integral part of library services, it seriously lacks funding and staff. The study recommends earnest efforts to build librarians' community to invigorate resource sharing among libraries.

전통적인 상호대차와 원문복사 서비스와 같은 도구를 통해 이용자의 정보요구를 충족시키는 것은 제한적이며 보다 심층적인 자원공유의 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 본 연구는 정보공유에 관련된 선행 연구를 분석을 통해 장애요인을 도출하고 정보공유와 관련된 이해관계자에 대한 분석을 제공하고 있다. 자원공유의 활성화와 관련하여 가장 중요한 이해관계자라고 여겨지는 사서의 인식을 보다 구체적으로 이해하기 위해 국내 대학에서 자원공유 관련서비스를 담당하는 실무사서 6명과의 면담을 수행하였다. 면담을 통해 규모가 큰 대학이 반드시 자원공유에 적극적이고 활발하게 서비스를 하고 있지는 않다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 무엇보다 자원공유에 대한 도서관간의 문화적 차이 그리고 담당 사서들의 태도에서 큰 간격이 있었다. 특히 연구에 대한 협소한 정의와 기관 규모의 불균형으로 인한 업무 폭주에 대한 부정적인 인식이 있었다. 전반적으로 자원공유를 새로운 차원에서 활성화시킬 수 있는 적극성이나 비전을 발견하기는 어려웠지만 자원공유 관련 서비스가 도서관에서 중요한 서비스로 인식되고 있고 담당자의 관심과 태도에 따라 발전의 가능성이 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 자원공유의 활성화, 보다 심층적이고 부가가치적인 자원공유 서비스를 창출하려면 먼저 사서들의 적극적인 개입이 요구되고 이를 위해 지역별, 주제별 사서 커뮤니티의 활성화가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강은주. 2006. 항공사의 전략적 제휴의 효과에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 성균관대학교 경영대학원.
  2. 사공철. 1996. 문헌정보학 용어사전. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
  3. 세계일보, 2005. 보유장서 태부족 - 초라한 대학도서관, 2005. 9. 29.
  4. 윤희윤. 2005. 학술정보유통위기 및 해소전략의 해부. 정보관리연구, 36(1): 1-32.
  5. 정상현. 1999. 대구경북지역 대학도서관의 상호협력 현황과 발전 방안: 외국학술지 분담 구입을 중심으로. 영대도서관소식, 9.
  6. 한국교육학술정보원. 2003. 상호대차 서비스 고도화를 위한 이용데이터 분석 및 활용. 사업보고 PR2003-6. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.
  7. 한국교육학술정보원. 2004. 학술정보자원의 개발․서비스를 위한 도서관 면책 및 저작권 보상에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.
  8. Beaubien, Anne K. 2007. ARL White Paper on Interlibrary Loan. [online]. [cited 2010.5.10]. .
  9. Bilal, D. and J. Kirby. 2002. Differences and Similarities in Information Seeking: Children and Adults as Web users. Information Processing & Management, 38(5): 649-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00057-7
  10. Bogar, C. 1998. Streamline Request Processing. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Information Supply, 9(2): 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1300/J110V09N02_03
  11. Chmelir, L. 2005. Patron-Initiated Borrowing and Traditional ILL: The Cascade Experience. Interlending and Document Supply, 33(1): 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610510582126
  12. Egan, N. 2005. "The Impact of Electronic Full-Text Resources on Interlibrary Loan: A Ten-Year Study at John Jay College of Criminal Justice." Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve, 15(3): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J474v15n03_05
  13. Emm, L. and F. C. Rosen. 2004. Jefferson County Public Library Interlibrary Loan and Resource Sharing Cost Study. White paper.
  14. Fleiser, C. S. and Bensoussan, B. E. 2003. Strategic and Competitive Analysis. : Methods for Analyzing Business Competition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  15. Goodier, R. and E. Dean. 2004. Changing Patterns in Interlibrary Loan and Document Supply. Interlending and Document Supply, 32(4): 206-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610410567944
  16. Jackson, M. E. 1998. Measuring the performance of interlibrary loan operations in North American research and college libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
  17. Jackson, M. E. 2004a. Accessing ILL/DD Services: New Cost-Effective Alternatives. Washington D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
  18. Jackson, M. E. 2004b. The Future of Interlending. Interlending and Document Supply, 32(2): 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610410699272
  19. Jackson, M. E. 2005. Re-examining the Future of Resource Sharing. Interlending and Document Supply, 33(4): 212-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610510700656
  20. Kochan, C. A. and D. R. Lee. 1998. Utah Article Delivery: A New Model for Consortial Resource Sharing. Computers in Libraries, 18(4): 24-29.
  21. Lobban, M. 2006. ILL, A Dying Breed or a New Brand? The Experience of Edinburgh University. Interlending and Document Supply, 34(1): 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610610649536
  22. Management Analysis Division, Minnesota Department of Administration. 2003. MINITEX Library Information Network: Application of Outcome-Based Evaluation to MINITEX Interlibrary Loan, Delivery, and Reference Services. [online]. [cited 2010.5.13]. .
  23. Mills, J. and D. Lodge. 2006. Affect, Emotional Intelligence and Librarian-User Interaction. Library Review, 55(9): 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530610706770
  24. Munson, D. M. 2006. Comparison of Summit Union Catalog Borrowing and Interlibrary Loan Returnables at Eastern Washington University. Journal of Library Administration, 45(3/4): 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v45n03_03
  25. Nitecki, D. A. and C. L. Jones. 2004. Borrow Direct: Its Impact on Service Quality at Yale University Library. Interlending and Document Supply, 32(2): 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610410551969
  26. Oberlander, C. 2007. Transforming the Document Delivery and Resource Sharing Engine. IFLA Journal, 33(1): 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035207074074
  27. Online Computer Library Center. 2004. The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition. Dublin, OH: Online Computer Library Center.
  28. Online Computer Library Center. 2005. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources. Dublin, OH: Online Computer Library Center.
  29. Pearce, Judith. 2005. New Frameworks for Resource Discovery and Delivery. Paper presented for the Standards New Zealand/Standards Australia IT-19 Seminar. [online]. [cited 2010.5.13]. .
  30. Preece, B. G. K. and L. Thomas. 1998. Cutting Out the Middleman: Patron-Initiated Interlibrary Loans. Library Trends, 47(2): 144-58.
  31. Radford, M. L. L. and L. S. Connaway. 2007. 'Screenagers' and Live Chat Reference: Living up to the Promise. Scan, 26(1): 31-39.
  32. Rainie, Lee. 2006. Life Online: Teens and Technology and the World to Come. Presentation to the Public Library Association. Boston. [online]. [cited 2010.5.13]. .
  33. Schuyler, M. 1998. ILL Automation and the Balance of Trade Deficit. Computers in Libraries, 18(5): 32-34.
  34. Shim, W. 2008. A Study on the Perception among University Librarians towards Resource Sharing. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(2): 5-24.
  35. Stein, J. E. 2001. Measuring the Performance of ILL and Document Supply: 1986-1998. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 2(1): 11-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007215
  36. Tenopir, C. 2004. Online Databases-Online Scholarly Journals: How Many? Library Journal, 129(2) (Feb. 1, 2004). [online]. [cited 2010.5.13]. .
  37. The Higher Education Consultancy Group and CHEMS. 2002. A Report to the RSLP on: Barriers to Resource Sharing Among Higher Education Libraries. [online]. [cited 2010.5.13]. .
  38. The Rethinking Resource Sharing Steering Committee. 2005. It's Time to Think again about Resource Sharing: a Discussion Paper. [online]. [cited 2010.5.13]. .
  39. Vattulainen, P. 2001. Performance of Interlending in Nordic Academic Libraries. Nordic University and Research Libraries. [online]. [cited 2010.5.13]. .
  40. Walhart, T. 1985. Performance Evaluation of ILL in the United States: A Review of the Research. Library and information Science and Research, 7(4): 313-331.
  41. Yang, Z. Y. 2006. Improving Turnaround Time for Document Delivery of Materials Owned but not on the Shelf: A Case Study from an Academic Library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2): 200-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.009

Cited by

  1. 의학학술지종합정보시스템(MEDLIS)의 원문제공서비스 이용 분석과 평가 vol.46, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2012.46.3.233
  2. 과학기술분야 원문제공서비스의 협력 네트워크 분석 vol.44, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.4.201312.443
  3. 국내 정보서비스 협력체를 통한 원문복사서비스 현황과 개선 방안 연구: 저작권 문제를 중심으로 vol.32, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.3.413