Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

Software Bundling for Competitive Advantage: Vendor Strategies and Public Policy Implications

  • Published : 2010.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As an engineered product, a software package has multiple dimensions that must be designed judiciously to enhance its competitive viability. Functionality, reliability and price are three such common dimensions. However, many software products are sold as bundles of individual components and the competitive impact of bundling has received less attention in the research literature. In this paper, we examine the implications of software vendors using bundling as an element of competitive strategy. A game theoretic model of the actions of an incumbent and a new entrant is developed and the impact on vendor and consumer welfare is analyzed. Numerical experiments with the model show that (i) increasing bundle size is an effective strategy for the incumbent to increase its payoff at the cost of the entrant's payoff and consumer surplus, especially when the entrant's quality is low (ii) in the presence of bundling, the entrant can still increase its own payoff and consumer surplus at the cost of the incumbent's payoff, by increasing product quality up to the level that best segments market demand with the incumbent and (iii) an increase in bundle size by the incumbent, or an increase in quality by the entrant, can both result in an increase of total surplus. Similar results are observed in a related case where the entrant offers free software bundles. Our results provide insights into how software vendors may strategically use bundling and quality as additional product dimensions in order to stay competitive in the market. These results also inform the competing vendors of the impact of bundling related public policy actions on their respective payoffs.

Keywords

References

  1. Adam, W. and Yellen, J., "Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976, pp. 475-498.
  2. Bakos, Y. and Brynsolfsson, E. "Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits, and Efficiency," Management Science, Vol. 45, No. 12, December 1999, pp. 1613-1630. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.12.1613
  3. Bakos, Y. and Brynsolfsson, E., "Bundling and Competition on the Internet," Marketing Science, Vol. 19, No. 1, Winter 2000, pp. 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.63.15182
  4. Behrens, B.C. and Levary, RR, "Practical Legal Aspect of Software Reverse Engineering," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No.2, February 1998, pp. 27-29.
  5. Berman, L. and Dunn, D., "Service Bundling and Strategic Equilibrium in the Information Services Industry," Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 39, 1987, pp. 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-6195(87)90011-7
  6. Dansby, R and Conrad, C., "Commodity Bundling," AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 74, No.2, May 1984, pp. 377-381.
  7. Dewan, Rand Freimer, M., "Consumers Prefer Bundled Add-Ins," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No.2, Fall 2003, pp. 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045761
  8. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., "Standardization, compatibility, and innovation," Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No.1, 1985 pp. 442-455.
  9. Geng, X., Stinchcombe, M.B., and Whinston, A.B., "Bundling Information Goods of Decreasing Value," Management Science, Vol. 51, No.4, April 2005, pp. 662-667. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0344
  10. Hanson, W. and Martin, R, "Optimal Bundle Pricing," Management Science, Vol. 36, No.2, February 1990, pp. 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.155
  11. Hahn, R (Editor), "Governrnent Policy toward Open Source Software," AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2002.
  12. Huang, G.Q., Zhang, X.Y., and Lo, V.H.Y., "Integrated Configuration of Platform Products and Supply Chains for Mass Customization: A Game-Theoretic Approach," IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, Vol. 54, No.1, February 2007, pp. 156-171.
  13. Johnson, J.P. and Myatt, D., "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," Oxford University Economics Discussion Paper 185, August 2004.
  14. Jung, H., Kim,S., and Chung, C., "Measuring Software Product Quality: A Survey of ISO/IEC 9126," IEEE Software, September/ October, 2004, pp. 88-92.
  15. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., "Network Externality, Competition, and Compatibiity," The American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 1985, pp. 424-440.
  16. Lee,S., "Bundling Strategy in Base-Supplemental Goods Markets: the case of Microsoft," European Journal of Information Systems, 2000, pp. 217-225.
  17. McAfee, R, McMillan, J., and Whinston, M., "Multiproduct Monopoly, Commodity Bundling, and Correlation of Values," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989, pp. 371- 384.
  18. Meese, A., "Monopoly Bundling in Cyberspace: how many products does Microsoft sell?," Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 44, No.1, Spring 1999.
  19. Nalebuff, B., "Competing against Bundles," Working Paper, Yale School of Management Working Paper Series H, New Haven, CT, Vol. 7, November 2000.
  20. Nalebuff, B., "Bundling as an Entry Barrier," Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 2004, pp. 159-187.
  21. Newman, N., "From Microsoft Word to Microsoft World: How Microsoft is Building a Global Monopoly," A NetAction White Paper, http://www.netaction.org/msoft/ world/MSWord2World.html.
  22. Pressman, R, Software Engineering, Fourth Edition, 1997.
  23. Ramanathan, R, Statistical Methods in Econometrics, MIT Press, 1993.
  24. Saygin, Y., Reisman, A., and Wang, Y. "Value of Information Gained from Data Mining in the Context of Information Sharing," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 51, No.4, November 2004, pp. 441-450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2004.836359
  25. Stigler, G., "A Note on Block Booking," The Organization of Industries, Irwin, 1968, pp. 165-170.
  26. Stremersch, S. and Tellis, G., "Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 1, January 2002, pp. 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.55.18455
  27. Varian, H., Information Rules, Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
  28. Uri, R, "Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs, and Competition," Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, No.4, Winter 1991, pp. 490-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600984
  29. Westland, J.C., "Congestion and Network Externalities in the Short Run Pricing Of Information Systems Services," Management Science, Vol. 38, No.7, July 1992, pp. 992-1009. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.7.992
  30. Whang, S., "Contracting for Software Development," Management Science, Vol. 38, No.3, March 1992, pp. 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.3.307
  31. Whinston, M., "Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion," The American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No.4, September 1990, pp. 837- 859.