The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of tribochemical silica coating on the shear bond strength of rebonded monocrystalline ceramic brackets

단결정형 세라믹 브라켓의 재접착 시 tribochemical silica coating이 전단접착강도에 미치는 영향

  • Jeon, Young-Mi (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kang, Sang-Wook (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 전영미 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 강상욱 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실)
  • Received : 2010.02.02
  • Accepted : 2010.04.19
  • Published : 2010.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tribochemical silica coating on the shear bond strength (SBS) of rebonded ceramic brackets using nano-filled flowable composite resin. Methods: A total of 60 premolars were prepared and divided into 4 equal groups as follows: Tribochemical silica coating (TC) + Transbond XT (XT), TC + Transbond supreme LV (LV), Sandblast treatment (SA) + XT, SA + LV. Treated ceramic brackets were rebonded on the premolars using each adhesive. All samples were tested in shear mode on a universal testing machine. Results: SBS of silica coated groups were high enough for clinical usage (TCLV: 10.82 $\pm$ 1.82 MPa, TCXT: 11.50 $\pm$ 1.72 MPa). But, SBS of the sandblast treated groups had significantly lower values than the tribochemical silica coated groups (SALV, 1.23 $\pm$ 1.16 MPa; SAXT, 1.76 $\pm$ 1.39 MPa; p < 0.05). There was no difference between the shear bond strength by type of adhesive. In the silica coated groups, 77% of the samples showed bonding failure in the adhesive. In the sandblast treated group, all bonding failures occurred at the bracket-adhesive interface. Conclusions: The result of this study suggest that newly introduced nano-filled flowable composite resin and tribochemical silica coating application on debonded ceramic bracket bases can produce appropriate bond strengths for orthodontic bonding.

본 연구는 탈락된 세라믹 브라켓을 tribochemical silica coating하고 nano-filled flowable composite resin (Transbond Supreme LV, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif, USA)을 이용하여 재접착하였을 때 교정치료에 충분한 접착강도를 얻을 수 있는지 평가하기 위해 시행하였다. 총 60개의 소구치를 준비하여 다음의 4개 군으로 나누었다: Tribochemical silica coating (TC) + Transbond Supreme LV (LV), TC + Transbond XT (XT), Sandblast treatment(SA) + LV, SA + XT. 재처리된 세라믹 브라켓은 각각의 접착제를 이용하여 치아에 부착하였다. 시편들을 상온의 생리식염수에 1주일간 보관한 뒤 열순환을 시켰다. 만능시험기로 전단접착강도를 측정한 뒤 파절양상을 평가하였다. TC군은 임상적으로 충분한 강도를 보였다(TCLV: 10.82 $\pm$ 1.82 MPa, TCXT: 11.50 $\pm$ 1.72 MPa). 하지만 SA군은TC군에 비하여 유의하게 낮은 전단접착강도를 보였다(SALV: 1.23 $\pm$ 1.16 MPa, SAXT: 1.76 $\pm$ 1.39 MPa, p < 0.05). LV군과 XT군의 전단접착강도는 유의한 차이가 없었다. TCLV, TCXT군 모두 시편의 77%가 접착제에서의 파절을 보였고, 각 군당 1개씩의 시편에서 법랑질 파절이 관찰되었다. SA군은 모든 파절이 브라켓과 접착제 계면에서 발생하였다. LV군과 XT군의 탈락양상에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 이상의 연구 결과에서 보면 nano-filled flowable composite resin과 tribochemical silica coating 처리를 이용하여 세라믹 브라켓을 재접착하면 충분한 전단접착강도를 얻을 수 있다. 단 법랑질 파절의 가능성이 있으므로 탈접착 시 적절한 기구와 기술을 이용해 주의깊게 브라켓을 제거해야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kew KK, Djeng SK. Recycling ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:44-7.
  2. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0
  3. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Finishing and detailing with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:251-64.
  4. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.
  5. Sung JY, Kang KH. Shear bond strength of rebonded ceramic brackets. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:234-47. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.4.234
  6. Martina R, Laino A, Cacciafesta V, Cantiello P. Recycling effects on ceramic brackets: a dimensional, weight and shear bond strength analysis. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:629-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.6.629
  7. Gaffey PG, Major PW, Glover K, Grace M, Koehler JR. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod 1995;65:351-7.
  8. Yim JB, Lee JW, Cha KS. Shear bond strength of recycled orthodontic brackets treated by variable reconditioning methods. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:569-79.
  9. Chung CH, Friedman SD, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:282-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125994
  10. Toroglu MS, Yaylali S. Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:181e1-7.
  11. Kang SW, Son WS, Park SB, Kim SS. Effect of thermocycling on shear bond strength and mode of failure of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to different porcelain restorations. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:225-33. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.4.225
  12. Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig WL editor. Orthodontics: current principles & techniques. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 579-659.
  13. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:699-705. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00299.x
  14. Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:420-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70124-5
  15. Birnie D. Ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod 1990;17:71-4.
  16. Harris AM, Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:215-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81055-8
  17. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art. Quintessence Int 1985;16:5-12.
  18. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80200-8
  19. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021
  20. Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:1-8.
  21. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-77.
  22. D'Attilio M, Traini T, Di Iorio D, Varvara G, Festa F, Tecco S. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use. Angle Orthod 2005;75:410-5.
  23. Miles PG. Indirect bonding with a flowable light-cured adhesive. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:646-7.
  24. Uysal T, Sari Z, Demir A. Are the flowable compoites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? Angle Orthod 2004;74:697-702.
  25. Ryou DB, Park HS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1105-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/013008-51.1
  26. Tecco S, Traini T, Caputi S, Festa F, de Luca V, D'Attilio M. A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study. Angle Orthod 2005;75:672-7.
  27. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Soliman MM, Oonsombat C, Laffoon JF, Warren J. Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets. World J Orthod 2007;8:8-12.
  28. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:616-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70195-2
  29. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  30. Kitahara-Ceia FM, Mucha JN, Marques dos Santos PA. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:548-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.022
  31. Habibi M, Nik TH, Hooshmand T. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:675-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.040
  32. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:170-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81007-8
  33. Andreasen GF, Stieg MA. Bonding and debonding brackets to porcelain and gold. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:341-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90164-3
  34. Katona TR, Moore BK. The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets--a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:543-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70138-5
  35. Oilo G. Bond strength testing--what does it mean? Int Dent J 1993;43:492-8.
  36. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod 2000;70:435-41.
  37. Bishara SE, Laffoon JF, VonWald L, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:521-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.123042
  38. Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ, Meyer RA Jr. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:251-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70062-2
  39. Smith RM, Barrett MG, Gardner WA, Marshall T, McLean MJ, McMichael DW, et al. Effect of environmental stress and surface treatment on resin-to-metal bonding. Am J Dent 1993;6:111-5.