DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pathogenic Groups Identified Among Isolates of Rhynchosporium secalis

  • 투고 : 2010.04.05
  • 심사 : 2010.05.31
  • 발행 : 2010.09.01

초록

Scald, caused by Rhynchosporium secalis has been the major yield-reducing factor for barley production during the last decade. In this study, pathogenic groups of R. secalis were identified to obtain a global picture of the assembly of isolates involved in Syrian populations which is essential for the development of scald-resistant barley cultivars. To identify a number of pathogenic groups, 49 isolates collected over ten years from major barley growing areas in Syria were evaluated on five differential barley genotypes. Genotypes presented a continuous range of response from highly susceptible to moderately resistant, but none were immune to the disease. A cluster analysis placed isolates in six distinct differential pathogenic groups. Mean disease rating of 39.24% was the separation point between avirulent and virulent reactions. Isolate Rs46 exhibited distinct differential virulence patterns associated with high frequency across all genotypes. Hence, the data presented here provides crucial information for future selection of isolates to develop durable barley scald resistance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anonymous, 1988. STAT-ITCF, Programme, MICROSTA, realizedby ECOSOFT, 2nd Ver. Institut Technique des Cereals etdes Fourrages Paris, France.
  2. Arabi, M. I. E., Jawhar M. and Al-Shehadah, E. 2008. Molecularand pathogenic variation identified among isolates of Rhynchosporiumsecalis from Syria. J. Plant Pathol. 90:179-184.
  3. Bouajila, A., Haouas, S., Fakhfakh, M., Rezgui, S. and Yahyaoui,A. 2006. Pathotypic diversity of Rhynchosporium secalis(oudum) in Tunisia. Afri. J. Biotechnol. 5:570-759.
  4. Brown, A. H. D., Garvin, D. F., Burdon, J. J., Abbott, D. C. andRead, B. J. 1996. The effect of combining scald resistancegenes on disease levels, yield and quality traits in barley.Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:361-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223177
  5. Eyal, Z., Scharen, A. L., Huffman, M. D. and Prescott, J. M. 1985.Global insights into virulence frequencies of Mycosphaerellagraminicola. Phytopathology 75:1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-75-1456
  6. Forgan, A. H., Knogge, W. and Anderson, P. A. 2007. AsexualGenetic Exchange in the Barley Pathogen Rhynchosporiumsecalis. Phytopathology 97:650-654. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-5-0650
  7. Goodwin, S. B., Webster, R. K. and Allard, R. W. 1994. Evidencefor mutation and migration as sources of genetic variation inpopulations of Rhynchosporium secalis. Phytopathology 84:1047-1053. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-1047
  8. Jorgensen, H. J. L. and Smedegaard, P. V. 1995. Pathogenic variationof Rhynchosporium secalis in Denmark and sources ofresistance in barley. J. Phytopathol. 79:297-301.
  9. Meles, K., Udupa, A., Abang, S. M. M., Abu-Blan, H., Baum, M.,Ceccarelli, S. and Yahyaoui, A. H. 2005. Amplified fragmentlength polymorphism among Rhynchosporium secalis isolatescollected from a single barley field in Syria. Ann. Appl. Biol.146:389-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040139.x
  10. Mert, Z. and Karakaya, A. 2003. Determination of the suitableinoculum concentration for Rhynchosporium secalis seedlingassays. J. Phytopathol. 151:699-701. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0931-1785.2003.00770.x
  11. Salamati, S. and Tronsmo, M. 1997. Pathogenicity of Rhynchosporiumsecalis isolates from Norway on 30 cultivars of barley.Plant Pathol. 46:416-424. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-20.x
  12. Stedman, O. J. 1980. Observations on the production and dispersalof spores, and infection by Rbynchosporium secalis.Ann. Appl. Biol. 5:163-175.
  13. Xi, K., Xue, A., Burnett, P. A., Helm, J. H. and Turkington, T. K.2000. Quantitative resistance of barley cultivars to Rhynchosporiumsecalis. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 22:217-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660009500466
  14. Xi, K., Turkington, T. K., Helm, J. H. and Bos, C. 2002. Pathogenicvariation of Rhynchosporium secalis in Alberta. Can. J.Plant Pathol. 24:176-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660309506993
  15. Tekauz, A. 1991. Pathogenic variation in Rhynchosporium secalison barley in Canada. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 13:298-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060669109500915
  16. Yahyaoui, A. H. 2003. Occurrence of barley leaf blight diseases inCentral West Asia and North Africa. In: Proceedings of theSecond International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blights, 7-11April (2002) ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria. Yahyaoui AH, BraderL., Tekauz A., Wallwork H., Steffenson B (eds.). p. 463.
  17. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimalcode for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
  18. Zaffarano, P. L., McDonald, B. A., Zala, Z. and Linde, C. C. 2006.Global Hierarchical Gene Diversity Analysis Suggests theFertile Crescent Is Not the Center of Origin of the BarleyScald Pathogen Rhynchosporium secalis. Phytopathology 96:941-950. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0941

피인용 문헌

  1. Transcriptome Analysis of the Barley-Rhynchosporium secalis Interaction vol.30, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.04.2014.0033
  2. Transcriptome profiling reveals distinct gene activations in barley responding to scald and spot blotch vol.46, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.034