References
- Shearer B, Gough MB, Setchell DJ. Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns. Biomaterials 1996;17:1891-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)00302-9
- Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:346-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.003
- Davis DR. Comparison of fit of two types of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90098-4
- Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain- fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
- Vahidi F, Egloff ET, Panno FV. Evaluation of marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns and metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:426-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90499-M
- Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90289-5
- McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
- McLaren EA, Terry DA. CAD/CAM systems, materials, and clinical guidelines for all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23:637-41.
- Steger T. Digident CAD/CAM production-growing with the possibilities. Int J Comput Dent 2004;7:77-84.
- Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, Kuretzky T. A clinical report and overview of scientific studies and clinical procedures conducted on the 3M ESPE Lava All-Ceramic System. J Prosthodont 2005;14:39-45 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00003.x
- Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90072-5
- Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:582-93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00449.x
- Kern M, Schaller HG, Strub JR. Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation in vivo. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:585-91.
- Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:459-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005
- Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
- Gassino G, Barone Monfrin S, Scanu M, Spina G, Preti G. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new in vitro 360- degree external examination procedure. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:218-23.
- Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
- Hertlein G, Hoscheler S, Frank S, Suttor D. Marginal fit of CAD/CAM manufactured all ceramic prosthesis. J Dent Res 2001;80:42-4.
- Gemalmaz D, Alkumru HN. Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80272-0
- Castellani D, Baccetti T, Clauser C, Bernardini UD. Thermal distortion of different materials in crown construction. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:360-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90554-1
- Lui JL. The effect of firing shrinkage on the marginal fit of porcelain jacket crowns. Br Dent J 1980;149:43-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804453
- Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:747-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O
- Song TJ. Marginal fit of the auro galvano crown system made using the electroforming technique. Master thesis, Seoul, Korea: Seoul National University, 2004.
Cited by
- Multifactorial analysis of the impact of different manufacturing processes on the marginal fit of zirconia copings vol.31, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-017
- evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials vol.4, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.162
- Accuracy and Reliability of Methods to Measure Marginal Adaptation of Crowns and FDPs: A Literature Review vol.22, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12006
- Evaluation of the marginal and internal gap of metal-ceramic crown fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology: two- and three-dimensional replica techniques vol.5, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.179
- Clinical Marginal and Internal Fit of Crowns Fabricated Using Different CAD/CAM Technologies vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12209
- A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations vol.41, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12205
- The effect of various veneering techniques on the marginal fit of zirconia copings vol.7, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.233
- Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions vol.20, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1590-5
- The marginal fit of E.max Press and E.max CAD lithium disilicate restorations: A critical review vol.35, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-008
- Micro-CT analysis of in-office computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured dental restorations pp.2168-1171, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2016.1165146
- Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions—a clinical comparative study vol.21, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1924-y
- Fit of CAD/CAM Tooth-supported Single Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses vol.4, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-017-0139-x
- Accuracy and Reliability of Intraoral Scanners: Are They the Better Option? vol.4, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-017-0145-z
- Shrinkage prediction using finite element analysis and experimental validation using three-dimension slurry printing system vol.91, pp.1-4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9842-3
- Micrometric precision of prosthetic dental crowns obtained by optical scanning and computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing system vol.19, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.8.088003
- The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: Press vs. CAD/CAM vol.32, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107/2018.vol32.0001
- The Effect of Sintering Time on the Marginal Fit of Zirconia Copings pp.1059941X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12731
- Influence of Manufacturing Methods of Implant-Supported Crowns on External and Internal Marginal Fit: A Micro-CT Analysis vol.2018, pp.2314-6141, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5049605
- Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review pp.1059941X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12800
- Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique vol.112, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.028
- A Dental Crown for Patients with Schizophrena vol.2, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15436/2379-1705.16.919
- Bonding performance and fracture strength of resin-infiltrated zirconia blocks for CAD/CAM systems vol.38, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2016.38.4.273
- The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press vol.22, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_31_19
- Marginal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In Vitro Study Using Micro‐CT Technology vol.28, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13115
- Marginal and internal fit evaluation of conventional metal-ceramic versus zirconia CAD/CAM crowns vol.12, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55946
- A clinical comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques regarding finish line locations and impression time vol.32, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12527
- Fit of tooth‐supported zirconia single crowns—A systematic review of the literature vol.6, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.323
- Clinical Evaluation of Time Efficiency and Fit Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns between Conventional and Digital Impression vol.13, pp.23, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235467
- Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns vol.125, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.036
- Effect of Die Materials on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Copings: An In Vitro Study vol.15, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602115010708
- Evaluation of Marginal Gap / Fit of Zirconia Copings & Full Contoured Monolith Zirconia Crowns (CAD / CAM) - A Comparative In-Vitro Study vol.10, pp.20, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2021/311
- Effects of porcelain veneering methods on conformity of the marginal and internal fit of three-unit zirconia framework vol.109, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00595-3
- Effect of ceramic layering on the fit of cobalt-chromium alloy 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by additive, soft milling, and casting technologies vol.126, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.033
- Fit Alteration of Presintered Co‐Cr and Zirconia Multiple‐Unit Prostheses After Ceramic Layering vol.30, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13336