DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current Status of Stem cell Research and its Connection with Biomedical Engineering Technologies

줄기세포 연구의 현황과 의공학 기술과의 접목

  • Park, Yong-Doo (Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Korea University)
  • 박용두 (고려대학교 의과대학 의공학교실)
  • Received : 2010.04.14
  • Accepted : 2010.04.19
  • Published : 2010.04.30

Abstract

Researches for stem cells have been focused on scientists in biomedical sciences as well as clinical application for its great therapeutic potentials. Stem cells have two distinct characteristics: self-renewal and differentiation. In this short review, the links between stem cell research and biomedical engineering is discussed based on the basic characteristics of stem cells. This concept can be extended to the fundamental questions of biological sciences for cells such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and migration. For understanding proliferation and apoptosis of stem cells, techniques from biomedical engineering such as surface patterning, MEMS, nanotechnologies have been used. The advanced technologies such as microfluidic technologies, three dimensional scaffold fabrication, and mechanical/electrical stimulation have also been used in cell differentiation and migration. Basic and unsolved questions in the stem cell research field have limitations by studying conventional technologies. Therefore, the strategic fusion between stem cell biology and novel biomedical engineering field will break the barriers for understanding fundamental questions of stem cells, which can open the window for the clinical applications of stem cell based therapeutics as well as regeneration of damaged tissues.

Keywords

References

  1. Krupnick, A.S., Shaaban, A., Radu, A. & Flake, A.W. Bone marrow tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 8, 145-155 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1089/107632702753503135
  2. Fuchs, E. & Segre, J.A. Stem cells: a new lease on life. Cell 100, 143-155. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81691-8
  3. Ahsan, T. & Nerem, R.M. Bioengineered tissues: the science, the technology, and the industry. Orthod Craniofac Res 8, 134-140 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00326.x
  4. Gurtner, G.C., Callaghan, M.J. & Longaker, M.T. Progress and potential for regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Med 58, 299-312 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.58.082405.095329
  5. Minguell, J.J., Erices, A. & Conget, P. Mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 226, 507-520 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/153537020122600603
  6. Cancedda, R., Bianchi, G., Derubeis, A. & Quarto, R. Cell therapy for bone disease: a review of current status. Stem Cells 21, 610-619 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.21-5-610
  7. Bjornson, C.R., Rietze, R.L., Reynolds, B.A., Magli, M.C. & Vescovi, A.L. Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. Science 283, 534-537 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5401.534
  8. Petersen, B.E., et al. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science 284, 1168-1170 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5417.1168
  9. Camargo, F.D., Green,R., Capetenaki, Y., Jackson, K.A. & Goodell, M.A. Single hematopoietic stem cells generate skeletal muscle through myeloid intermediates. Nat Med 9, 1520-1527 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm963
  10. Joshi, C.V. & Enver, T. Plasticity revisited. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14, 749-755 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00392-7
  11. Frisen, J. Stem cell plasticity? Neuron 35, 415-418 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00798-5
  12. Wang, X., et al. Cell fusion is the principal source of bone-marrow-derived hepatocytes. Nature 422, 897-901 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01531
  13. Forrester, J.S., Price, M.J. & Makkar, R.R. Stem cell repair of infarcted myocardium: an overview for clinicians. Circulation 108, 1139-1145 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000085305.82019.65
  14. Reinecke, H., Minami, E., Poppa, V. & Murry,C.E. Evidence for fusion between cardiac and skeletal muscle cells, Circ Res 94, e56-60 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000125294.04612.81
  15. Wagers, A.J., Sherwood,R.I., Christensen,J.L. & Weissman, I.L. Little evidence for developmental plasticity of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Science 297, 2256-2259 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074807
  16. Krause, D.S., et al. Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by asingle bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell 105, 369-377 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00328-2
  17. Herzog, E.L., Chai, L. & Krause, D.S. Plasticity of marrow-derived stem cells. Blood 102, 3483-3493 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1664
  18. Verfaillie, C.M., Pera, M.F. & Lansdorp, P.M. Stem cells: hype and reality. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program), 369-391 (2002).
  19. Krause, D.S. Plasticity of marrow-derived stem cells. Gene Ther 9, 754-758 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301760
  20. Hubbell, J.A. Materials as morphogenetic guides in tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechno 14, 551-558 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2003.09.004
  21. Zhang, H., Hutrnacher, D.W., Chollet, F., Poo, A.N. & Burdet, E. Microrobotics and MEMS-based fabrication techniques for scaffold-based tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 5, 477-489 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200400202
  22. Wang, N., Ostuni, E., Whitesides, G.M. & Ingber, D.E. Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 52,97-106 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.10037
  23. McBeath, R., Pirone, D.M., Nelson, C.M., Bhadriraju, K. & Chen, C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 6, 483-495 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9
  24. Dalby, M.J., Hart, A. & Yarwood, S.J. The effect of the RACK1 signalling protein on the regulation of cell adhesion and cell adhesion and cell contact guidance on nanometric grooves. Biomaterials 29, 282-289 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.030
  25. Mirnov, V., Kasyanov, V. & Markwald, R.R. Nanotechnology in vascular tissue engineering: from nanoscaffolding towards rapid vessel biofabrication. Trends Biotechnol 26, 338-344 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.03.001
  26. Xia, Y., et al. Electrical stimulation of neonatal cardiac myocytes activates the NFAT3 and GATA4 pathways and up-regulates the adenylosuccinate synthetase 1 gene. J Biol Chem 275, 1855-1863 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.3.1855
  27. Supronowicz, P.R., et al. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to altemating current stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res 59, 499-506 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10015
  28. Hoffman, A.S. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54, 3-12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00239-3
  29. Miyata, T., Uragami, T. & Nakamae, K. Biomolecule-sensitive hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54, 79-98 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00241-1
  30. Fedorovich, N.E., et al. Hydrogels as extracellular matrices for skeletal tissue engineering: state-of-the-art and novel application in organ printing. Tissue Eng 13, 1905-1925 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0175
  31. Schnabel, M., et al. Dedifferentiation-associated changes in morphology and gene expression in primary human articular chondrocytes in cell culture. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10,62-70. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.2001.0482
  32. Marga, F., Neagu, A., Kosztin, I. & Forgacs, G. Developmental biology and tissue engineering. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 81, 320-328 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.20109
  33. Beebe, D.J., et al. Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 404, 588-590 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35007047
  34. Chung, B.G., et al. Human neural stem cell growth and differentiation in a gradient-generating microfluidic device. Lab Chip 5, 401-406 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1039/b417651k
  35. Takayama, S., et al. Selective chemical treatment of cellular microdomains using multiple laminar streams. Chem Biol 10, 123-130 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(03)00019-X
  36. Li Jeon, N., et al. Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device. Nat Biotechnol 20, 826-830 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt712
  37. Lee, S.H., Moon, J.J. & West, J.L. Three-dimensional micropatterning of bioactive hydrogels via two-photon laser scanning photolithography for guided 3D cell migration. Biomaterials 29, 2962-2968 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.004
  38. Kim, M.S., et al. Hyaluronic acid induces osteopontin via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway to enhance the motility of human glioma cells. Cancer Res 65, 686-691 (2005).
  39. Kim, J., et al. Bone regeneration using hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel with bone morphogenic protein-2 and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials (2007).