대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제5권4호
  • /
  • Pages.551-558
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지

미세전류치료가 아주반트 유도 류마티스관절염 유발 흰쥐의 인터루킨-6 발현에 미치는 영향

Effect of Microcurrent Therapy on Interleukin-6 Expression in Adjuvant Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis Rat Model

  • 이현민 (호남대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이상열 (김해대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 장종성 (영남이공대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 이명희 (대구보건대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 강종호 (남부대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Lee, Hyun-Min (Department of Physical Therapy, Honam University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Yeol (Department of Physical Therapy, Gimhae College) ;
  • Chang, Jong-Sung (Department of Physical Therapy, Yeungnam College of Science & Technology) ;
  • Lee, Myoung-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Kang, Jong-Ho (Department of Physical Therapy, Nambu University)
  • 투고 : 2010.09.06
  • 심사 : 2010.11.11
  • 발행 : 2010.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적 : 미세전류 자극이 아주반트로 류마티스 관절염을 유발한 실험동물의 염증반응과 통증에 미치는 효과를 알아보기 위하여 실험동물의 발허리발가락관절내 염증반응 정도를 나타내는 인터루킨-6(interleukin-6)의 발현과 핫플레이트(hot plate)를 이용한 발도피지연시를 측정하여 미세전류의 효과에 대하여 알아보고자 하는데 목적이 있다. 연구방법 : 실험동물은 무작위로 대조군(n=18)과 미세전류를 적용한 실험군(n=18)으로 구분하였고, 각 군당 6마리씩 1일군, 7일군, 14일군으로 배정하였다. 류마티스 관절염 유발후 1일, 7일, 14일에 모든 실험동물의 열통각 역치를 나타내는 발도피지연시와 발허리발가락관절내 인터루킨-6의 발현정도를 측정하였다. 각 집단 내의 기간에 따른 발도피지연시와 인터루킨-6의 면역반응성은 일원배치 분산분석을 실시하였고, 사후분석으로는 Duncan의 다중범위검정을 실시하였다. 실험군과 대조군을 비교하기 위하여 독립표본 t-test를 실시하였다. 연구결과 : 실험결과는 다음과 같다. 1) 아주반트 주사 1일후, 실험군과 대조군에서 인터루킨-6 면역반응성과 발도피지연시는 비슷한 양상을 보였다. 2) 인터루킨-6 면역반응성은 아주반트 주사 7일, 14일 후 대조군이 실험군보다 유의하게 증가되었다(p<.05). 3) 발도피지연시는 아주반트 주사 7일, 14일 후 실험군이 대조군보다 유의하게 증가되었다(p<.05). 결론 : 이상의 결과로부터, 미세전류 자극이 아주반트로 유발된 류마티스관절염 모델에서 활액 조직내 염증반응을 감소시키고 열통각역치는 증가되는 것을 알 수 있었다.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aaron RK, Boyan BD, Ciombor DM et al. Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:30-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200402000-00006
  2. Allen JD, Mattacola CG, Perrin DH. Effect of Microcurrent Stimulation on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness: A Double-Blind Comparison. J Athl Train. 1999;34(4):334-7.
  3. Bonacci JA. & Higbie EJ. Effects of Microcurrent Treatment on Perceived Pain and Muscle Strength Following Eccentric Exercise. J Athl Train. 1997; 32(2):119-23.
  4. Chan HK, Fung DT, Ng GY. Effects of low-voltage microamperage stimulation on tendon healing in rats. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2007;37(7):399- 403.
  5. Chapman-Jones D, Hill D. Novel Microcurrent Treatment is More Effective than Conventional Therapy for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: Randomised comparative trial. Physiotherapy. 2002;88(8):471-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60849-8
  6. Cheng N, Van Hoof H, Bockx E et al. The effects of electric currents on ATP generation, protein synthesis, and membrane transport of rat skin. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;171:264-72.
  7. Choy EH. & Panayi GS. Cytokine pathways and joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(12):907-16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200103223441207
  8. El-Husseini T, El-Kawy S, Shalaby H et al. Microcurrent skin patches for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty : a pilot study. Int Orthop. 2007;31(2):.229-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0149-0
  9. Fransen M. When is physio therapy appropriate? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004;18(4):477-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2004.03.006
  10. Frick, A. & McCauley D. Microcurrent electrical therapy. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2005;25(10):418-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2005.09.012
  11. Gossec L, Pavy S, Constantin A et al. Nonphar- macological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis: clinical practice guidelines based on published evidence and expert opinion. Joint Bone Spine. 2006;73(4):396-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.01.008
  12. Ho LOL, Kwong WL, Cheing GLY. Effectiveness of Microcurrent Therapy in the Management of Lateral Epicondylitis : A Pilot Study. HongKong Physiotherapy Journal. 2007;25:14-20.
  13. Jazayeri JA, Carroll GJ, Vernallis AB. Interleukin-6 subfamily cytokines and rheumatoid arthritis : role of antagonists. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010; 10(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2009.09.019
  14. Kannan K, Ortmann RA, Kimpel D. Animal models of rheumatoid arthritis and the irrelevance to human disease. Pathophysiology. 2005;12(3):167-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2005.07.011
  15. Kim GY, Kim YE, Kim SE et al. The Effect of Microcurrent Stimulation on Immediately Early Gene in Pain Induced Model. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2004;16(3):449-58.
  16. Kim YP, Lee JW, Seo SK et al. Anti-hyperalgesic Effects of Electroacupuncture Combination of Microcurrent Stimulation in Rat with Induced Inflammation. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2007;19(1): 67-78.
  17. Lee HM, Chae YW. Influence of Microcurrent Therapy in Interleukin-1 Expression in Rhueumatoid Arthritis Rats. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(20): 103-8.
  18. McMakin CR, Gregory WM, Phillips TM. Cytokine changes with microcurrent treatment of fibromyalgia associated with cervical spine trauma. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2005;9(3): 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2004.12.003
  19. Milman N, Karsh J, Booth RA. Correlation of a multi-cytokine panel with clinical disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Bio chem. 2010:1-6.
  20. Oh HJ, Kim JW, Kim MS et al. Microcurrent stimulation, Woundhealing, Intensity. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2008;20(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.20.1
  21. Okamoto Y, Nishida M. Cytokine balance in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Yakugaku- Zasshi. 2001;121(2):131-8. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.121.131
  22. Park RJ. Electrotherapy. Seoul. Hyunmoon. 2003: 424-35.
  23. Rexing J, Dunning D, Siegel AM et al. Effects of cold compression, bandaging, and microcurrent electrical therapy after cranial cruciate ligament repairindogs. Vet Surg. 2010;39(1):54-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00620.x
  24. Rockstroh G, Schleicher W, Krummenauer F. Effectiveness of microcurrent therapy as a constituent of post-hospital rehabilitative treatment in patients after total knee alloarthroplasty - a randomized clinical trial. Rehabilitation(Stuttg). 2010;49(3):173-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1246152
  25. Scott DL, Smith C, Kingsley G. What are the consequences of early rheumatoid arthritis for the individual? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19(1):117-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2004.08.007
  26. Simoes SI, Delgado TC, Lopes RM et al. Develop- ments in the rat adjuvant arthritis model and its use in therapeutic evaluation of novel non- invasive treatment by SOD in Transfersomes. J Control Release. 2005;103(2):419-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.12.008
  27. Vliet Vlieland TP. Rehabilitation of people with rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17(5):847-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1521-6942(03)00043-3
  28. Zuim PR, Garcia AR, Turcio KH et al. Evaluation of microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation(MENS) effectiveness on muscle pain in temporomandibular disorders patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14(1): 61-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572006000100012
  29. Zvaifler NJ, Tsai V, Alsalameh S et al. Pannocytes: distinctive cells found In rheumatoid arthritis articular cartilage erosions. Am J Pathol. 1997;150 (3):1125-38.