Is Interventional Therapy Superior to Medical Treatment in Chronic Low Back Pain?: Yes, in Considerable Cases

만성요통의 치료에서 중재적인 치료가 보존적 치료보다 우세한가?: 긍정적인 입장에서

  • Received : 2010.06.05
  • Accepted : 2010.06.10
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

The British guideline for early management of persistent low back pain, published in 2009, indicated that physicians should offer exercise or medication, rather than radiological interventions or injections, as first choice of treatment in the patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, there had been great controversies regarding the effectiveness of interventional treatment of patients with CLBP. Both somatic (discogenic, instability, etc) and psychosocial factors contribute to the pathophysiology of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Although it can be difficult in many occasions, thorough interview with the patients and specific diagnostic approaches can help us to identify which is the main etiology in individual patient. With the recent progress in medical radiology and development of new therapeutic modalities, some subgroups of patients of CLBP caused by somatic factors appear to be good candidates of interventional therapy. Interventional therapy can be considered in patients with CLBP caused by annulus rupture, facet joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and vertebral column instability. Among other subgroups of CLBP, carefully selected patients with disc degeneration show the most favorable result by interventional therapy. In this regard, discogenic pain, either as a form of CLBP or acute discogenic radiculopathy, seems to be a good indication of interventional therapy. Because many spine specialists generally consider those with radiculopathy are easier to be treated, patients with CLBP tend to be subjects of conventional conservative therapy. For these reasons, clinicians should make their best effort to identify every possible somatic cause in patients with CLBP before regarding them as hypochondriacs. In this review, some of the recent evidence on the role of interventional treatment in patients with CLBP will be discussed, and some of our cases who showed favorable results by interventional therapy will be presented.

Keywords

References

  1. Wittink H, Hoskins Michel T, Wagner A, Sukiennik A, Rogers W. Deconditioning in patients with chronic low back pain. Fact or fiction? Spine 2000;25:2221-2228. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200009010-00013
  2. de Schepper EI, Damen J, van Meurs JB, Ginai AZ, Popharm M, Hofman A, et al. The association between lumbar disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine 2010; 35:531-536. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa5b33
  3. Polatin PB, Kinney RK, Gatchel RJ, Lillo E, Mayer TG. Psychiatric illness and chronic low back pain. The mind and the spine-Which goes first? Spine 1993;18:66-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199301000-00011
  4. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2006 15:S192-S300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1
  5. Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, Ojala R, Haapea M, Heliovaara M, et al. Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies. Prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers. Spine 2007;32: 1116-1122. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000261561.12944.ff
  6. Miyamoto H, Doita M, Nishida K, Yamamoto T, Sumi M, Kurosaka M. Effects of cyclic mechanical stress on the production of inflammatory agents by nucleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus derived cells in vitro. Spine 2006;31:4-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000192682.87267.2a
  7. Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Presidential symposium on instability of the lumbar spine: introduction. Spine 1985;10:254. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198504000-00012
  8. Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systemic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician 2009;12:233-251.
  9. Riew KD, Park JB, Cho YS, Gilula L, Patel A, Lenke LG, et al. Nerve root blocks in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88:1722-1725. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00278
  10. Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Spine 2008;33:123-131. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816043af
  11. Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 2003;28: 1913-1921. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A