Abstract
Despite continuous efforts by the construction industry to achieve better quality, it doesn't seem that much has been improved. This is mainly because current specifications do not satisfy a change in the market environment, which is that a higher level of quality is now demanded by users. Quality improvement efforts have been satisfied merely to meet specifications. On the other hand, advanced countries have been experienced great success in their construction techniques and have reduced costs by introducing apay adjustment system to the construction industry, in which compensation is based on performance. Following their example, Koreashould introduce such a pay adjustment system in order to motivate the members of our construction industry to achieve better quality and a higher level of construction techniques. However, there has been a lack of a rational approach to the development of a system for cost coordination, as well as performance and quality inspection. Thus, in this study a legal and logical plan was developed that can be used to adjust the construction cost, along with the performance inspection of quality results, in order to introduce a pay adjustment system that is appropriate for domestic regulations.
건설 산업은 지속적인 품질관리 노력에도 불구하고 건설공사의 품질은 크게 향상되지 못하고 있다. 이러한 이유는 사용자의 요구품질수준은 높아지고 있으나 시방서의 품질수준은 환경변화를 수용하지 못하고 있으며, 품질향상노력 역시 시방기준 충족에 만족하고 있다. 이에 반해 해외 선진국들은 건설공사에 지불규정제도를 도입하여 성능기준에 따라 대가를 지급함으로써 유지보수에 대한 추가 비용을 절감하고 시공기술 향상에 큰 효과를 얻고 있다. 이에 따라 우리나라도 건설 산업의 품질향상과 건설기술개발을 유도할 수 있는 지불규정제도의 도입이 필요하지만 성능품질검사에 따른 대가 조정의 법적 논리가 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 논문은 국내 법규체계에 맞는 지불규정제도를 도입하기 위해서 성능품질검사 결과에 따른 공사비를 조정할 수 있는 법적 논리방안을 개발하였다.
