Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Targer Factor Value of Port State Control Inspection Using Absolute Measurement

절대평가법을 이용한 항만국통제 점검 표적점수 평가에 관한 연구

  • Jang, Woon-Jae (Maritime Safety Research Center, Korea Ship Safety Technology & Authority)
  • 장운재 (선박안전기술공단 해사안전연구센터)
  • Received : 2010.04.30
  • Accepted : 2010.07.13
  • Published : 2010.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In recently, IMO consider including an marine casualty factor when Port State Control Inspection evaluate.. This paper proposes an evaluation to Target Factor Values of Port State Control Inspections(PSCITFV) using absolute measurement. To this solve, therefore, this paper used the absolute measurement which is informed compensate the defect and the more rational and objective methode, checked the effectiveness to compare an result with absolute measurement and PSCITFV of Tokyo MOU using Wilcoxson test. Finally, rate change of PSC was investigated by an experiment which changed the values of evaluation factors. As a result, it was evaluation factors of high rate change that was detention, ship's age, casualty factors. Therefore, this factors have to a priority management to do for prevent of PSC.

최근 IMO에서는 항만국통제 우선점검 평가에 해양사고율을 평가항목에 추가로 포함하는 것에 대해 검토하고 있다. 본 연구는 절대 평가법을 이용한 항만국통제 우선점검을 위한 대상선박 선정법을 제안하였다. 이를 위해 항만국통제 우선점검 평가의 단점을 보완하고 합리적인 평가법으로 널리 알려진 절대평가법을 이용하였다. 또한 이 방법과 기존 도쿄MOU의 평가방법을 10척에 윌콕슨 검정으로 비교하여 유효성을 확인하였으며, 평가항목의 평가치를 변경하는 실험을 통해 PSC 우선점검 순위변동을 조사하였다. 그 결과 출항정지, 선령, 해양사고 등 평가항목의 가중치가 높은 평가치가 순위변동에 영향이 큰 것으로 나타나 이 항목들을 중점 관리하여 PSC를 예방할 필요가 있다는 점이 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강동수(1998), 항만국통제론, 효성출판사
  2. 강병서, 김계수(2007), 사회과학통계분석, 한나래.
  3. 국토해양부(2009), IMO FSI 17차 회의결과 보고서, http://imokorea.org.
  4. 금종수, 윤명오(2005), 항만국통제실무론, 다솜출판사.
  5. 금종수, 윤명오, 장운재(2001), “연안해역의 항행안전성 평가에 관한 연구”, 해양환경안전학회지 제7권 2호, pp. 39-48.
  6. Ozcayir, Z. O.(2001), Port State Control. LLP, London, UK, pp. 115-116.
  7. Paris MOU(2010), The New Inspection Regime(NIR) of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding, http://www.parismou.org.
  8. Pierre, C., Maximo Q, M.J and Wolff F.C.(2008), “On the effectivness of port state control inspections”, Transportation Research Part E 44, pp. 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2006.11.005
  9. Pierre, C, Maximo Q, MJ and Wolff F.C.(2009), “Evidence on target factor used for port state control inspections”, Marine Policy 33, pp. 847-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.03.004
  10. Satty, T.L.(1986), “Absolute and relative measurement with the AHP”. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp. 327-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(86)90043-1
  11. Tokyo MOU(2010), Annual report on port state control in the asia-pacific region 2009, Tokyo MOU.

Cited by

  1. A Study on Development of Safety Management Evaluation Index for Shipping Company vol.19, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2013.19.6.629
  2. A Study on the Development of Evaluation Index for Safety Management Level of Shipping Company(2) : Development of Evaluation Items for Safety Management Index vol.21, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2015.21.6.696